Literature DB >> 23149956

Effect of severity of rod contour on posterior rod failure in the setting of lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a biomechanical study.

Jessica A Tang1, Jeremi M Leasure, Justin S Smith, Jenni M Buckley, Dimitriy Kondrashov, Christopher P Ames.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rod failure has been reported clinically in pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) to correct flat back deformity.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the fatigue life of posterior screw-rod constructs in the setting of PSO as a function of the severity of rod contour angle.
METHODS: A modified ASTM F1717 to 04 was used. Rods were contoured to the appropriate angle for the equivalent 20-, 40-, or 60-degree PSO angles. Testing was performed on a mechanical test frame at 400/40 N and 250/25 N, and specimens were cycled at 4 Hz to failure or run-out at 2,000,000 cycles. The effect of the screw-rod system on fatigue strength of curved rods was compared using Cox proportional hazards regression.
RESULTS: At 400 N/40 N, Cox proportional hazards regression indicated that contouring rods from a 20-degree PSO angle to either 40 or 60 degrees significantly decreased fatigue life (hazard ratio = 7863.6, P = .0144). However, contouring rods from a 40-degree PSO angle to 60 degrees had no significant effect on the fatigue life (P > .05). At 250 N/25 N, Cox proportional hazards regression indicated that contouring rods from a 20-degree PSO angle to either 40 or 60 degrees significantly decreased fatigue life (hazard ratio = 7863.6, P = .0144). Furthermore, contouring rods from a 40-degree PSO angle to 60 degrees had a significant effect on the fatigue life (hazard ratio = 7863.6, P = .0144).
CONCLUSION: Results suggest that in the setting of PSO, the fatigue life of posterior spinal fixation rods depends largely on the severity of the rod angle used to maintain the vertebral angle created by the PSO and is significantly lowered by rod contouring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23149956     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827ba066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

1.  Kinematic efficacy of supplemental anterior lumbar interbody fusion at lumbosacral levels in thoracolumbosacral deformity correction with and without pedicle subtraction osteotomy at L3: an in vitro cadaveric study.

Authors:  Benny T Dahl; Jonathan A Harris; Manasa Gudipally; Mark Moldavsky; Saif Khalil; Brandon S Bucklen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs.

Authors:  Andrea Luca; Claudia Ottardi; Maurizio Sasso; Liliana Prosdocimo; Luigi La Barbera; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera; Tomaso Villa
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Instability and instrumentation failures after a PSO: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sebastien Charosky; Pierre Moreno; Philippe Maxy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Metallic Implants Used in Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Jakub Litak; Michał Szymoniuk; Wojciech Czyżewski; Zofia Hoffman; Joanna Litak; Leon Sakwa; Piotr Kamieniak
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 5.  RCC (reinforced criss-cross construct): an easy and effective multi-rod thoraco-lumbar posterior reconstruction technique.

Authors:  Ajay Krishnan; Aditya Raj; Umesh Meena; Devanand Degulmadi; Ravi Ranjan Rai; Shivanand Mayi; Mirant Dave; Bharat R Dave
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-04-09

6.  Mechanical revision following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a competing risk survival analysis in 171 consecutive adult spinal deformity patients.

Authors:  Tanvir Johanning Bari; Dennis Winge Hallager; Lars Valentin Hansen; Benny Dahl; Martin Gehrchen
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-09-01

7.  A Novel 4-Rod Technique Offers Potential to Reduce Rod Breakage and Pseudarthrosis in Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.

Authors:  Sachin Gupta; Murat Sakir Eksi; Christopher P Ames; Vedat Deviren; Blythe Durbin-Johnson; Justin S Smith; Munish C Gupta
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.703

Review 8.  [Pseudarthrosis and construct failure after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy : Influence of biomechanics, surgical technique, biology and avoidance strategies].

Authors:  C Birkenmaier
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Risk factors for rod fracture after posterior correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy: a retrospective case-series.

Authors:  Cameron Barton; Andriy Noshchenko; Vikas Patel; Christopher Cain; Christopher Kleck; Evalina Burger
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.