| Literature DB >> 23149582 |
Meta Roestenberg, Else M Bijker, B Kim Lee Sim, Peter F Billingsley, Eric R James, Guido J H Bastiaens, Anne C Teirlinck, Anja Scholzen, Karina Teelen, Theo Arens, André J A M van der Ven, Anusha Gunasekera, Sumana Chakravarty, Soundarapandian Velmurugan, Cornelus C Hermsen, Robert W Sauerwein, Stephen L Hoffman.
Abstract
Controlled human malaria infection with sporozoites is a standardized and powerful tool for evaluation of malaria vaccine and drug efficacy but so far only applied by exposure to bites of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf)-infected mosquitoes. We assessed in an open label Phase 1 trial, infection after intradermal injection of respectively 2,500, 10,000, or 25,000 aseptic, purified, vialed, cryopreserved Pf sporozoites (PfSPZ) in three groups (N = 6/group) of healthy Dutch volunteers. Infection was safe and parasitemia developed in 15 of 18 volunteers (84%), 5 of 6 volunteers in each group. There were no differences between groups in time until parasitemia by microscopy or quantitative polymerase chain reaction, parasite kinetics, clinical symptoms, or laboratory values. This is the first successful infection by needle and syringe with PfSPZ manufactured in compliance with regulatory standards. After further optimization, the use of such PfSPZ may facilitate and accelerate clinical development of novel malaria drugs and vaccines.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23149582 PMCID: PMC3541746 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0613
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg ISSN: 0002-9637 Impact factor: 2.345
Results of potency and sporozoite membrane integrity assays on the lot of PfSPZ Challenge used in this clinical trial
| Time point | Potency (no. of parasites expressing PfMSP-1/well) | % Viability (sporozoite membrane integrity assay) |
|---|---|---|
| Fresh | 27 ± 4.6 | ND |
| Release | 20 ± 1.7 | 83.3% ± 6.5% |
| 6 Month | 18 ± 2.1 | 86.6% ± 1.9% |
| 9 Month | 20 ± 2.1 | 83.7% ± 8.4% |
| 12 Month | 21 ± 1.5 | 84.8% ± 3.0% |
| 18 Month | 20 ± 0.6 | 83.7% ± 4.2% |
| 24 Month | 18 ± 1.0 | 86.0% ± 1.5% |
| Pre-1st clinical dose (26 Month) | 17 ± 0.6 | 79.4% ± 6.5% |
| Post-last clinical dose (30 Month) | 16 ± 2.6 | 87.4% ± 1.9% |
Fresh PfSPZ used for the lot of PfSPZ Challenge used in this clinical trial produced 26% more PfMSP-1-expressing parasites in this assay than did PfSPZ that had been cryopreserved for several days (Release); at 30 months, several weeks after inoculation of the last volunteers the PfSPZ had a 40.7% reduction in potency by this assay as compared with fresh PfSPZ. There was no reduction in the results of the sporozoite membrane integrity of cryopreserved PfSPZ during 30 months of storage.
The sporozoite membrane integrity assay was not done on fresh PfSPZ for this particular lot. In our most recent three production campaigns for PfSPZ Challenge, fresh viability was 97.8%, 99.0%, and 98.2%, whereas after cryopreservation viability was reduced to 90.9%, 91.5%, and 87.4%, respectively, a mean reduction of 8.5%.
ND = not done.
Parasitemia data by thick blood smear and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
| Volunteer code | Thick smear | qPCR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-patent period (day) | Parasite density at diagnosis (Pf/μL) | qPCR positive (day) | Parasite density at first day positive (Pf/μL) | Parasite density by qPCR at time of diagnosis by thick smear (Pf/μL) | |
| Group 1: 2,500 PfSPZ | |||||
| 696–18 | 12.3 | 4 | 9.6 | 0.08 | 5 |
| 711–08 | 14.0 | 16 | 12 | 0.16 | 71 |
| 795–06 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 935–01 | 14.0 | 124 | 10.6 | 0.03 | 89 |
| 937–20 | 12.3 | 6 | 10.6 | 0.12 | 43 |
| 940–14 | 12.3 | 6 | 10.3 | 0.06 | 35 |
| Geom. mean | 13.0 | 12 | 10.59 | 0.1 | 35 |
| No. of positives | 5/6 | 5/6 | |||
| Group 2: 10,000 PfSPZ | |||||
| 119–03 | 12.6 | 24 | 9.6 | 0.68 | 6 |
| 603–11 | 13.0 | 8 | 11 | 0.17 | 2 |
| 736–04 | 11.0 | 6 | 9.6 | 0.04 | 3 |
| 783–25 | 13.3 | 6 | 10.6 | 0.03 | 15 |
| 788–21 | 14.0 | 26 | 11 | 1.12 | 6 |
| 925–26 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Geom. mean | 12.7 | 11 | 10.34 | 0.2 | 5 |
| No. of positives | 5/6 | 5/6 | |||
| Group 3: 25,000 PfSPZ | |||||
| 647–30 | 14.0 | 512 | 9.3 | 0.32 | 759 |
| 720–13 | 12.3 | 6 | 10.3 | 0.32 | 162 |
| 789–15 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| 806–09 | 12.3 | 8 | 9 | 0.25 | 48 |
| 909–29 | 14.3 | 48 | 11.3 | 0.13 | 102 |
| 926–24 | 12.3 | 6 | 10 | 0.19 | 68 |
| Geom. mean | 13.0 | 23 | 9.95 | 0.2 | 132 |
| No. of positives | 5/6 | 5/6 | |||
N/A = not applicable; thick-smear negative volunteers were presumptively treated on day 21 after infection.
Figure 1.Parasite density as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) in the 2,500 (A), 10,000 (B), and 25,000 (C) PfSPZ Challenge dose groups. Panels A, B, and C show geometric mean parasite density of positive volunteers per group with confidence intervals (N = 5 for all groups) from day of inoculation through last day of positivity after initiation of treatment. Panel D shows an overlay of geometric mean parasite densities of positive volunteers in each group.
Numbers of volunteers reporting solicited adverse events possibly, probably, or definitely related to administration of PfSPZ Challenge, with mean duration of events*
| Any adverse event | 2,500 PfSPZ ( | 10,000 PfSPZ ( | 25,000 PfSPZ ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of volunteers | Mean duration ± SD (days) | Number of volunteers | Mean duration ± SD (days) | Number of volunteers | Mean duration ± SD (days) | |
| Abdominal pain | 1 | 2.9 | 1 | 0.04 | 2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| Arthralgia | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A |
| Chest pain | 1 | 0.04 | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A |
| Chills | 1 | 2.0 | 2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 2 | 0.9 ± 0.6 |
| Diarrhea | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A | 1 | 0.8 |
| Fatigue | 5 | 2.9 ± 3.3 | 3 | 2.5 ± 1.7 | 5 | 3.0 ± 3.9 |
| Fever | 3 | 1.6 ± 1.5 | 2 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 4 | 0.8 ± 0.4 |
| Headache | 6 | 1.1 ± 1.1 | 6 | 1.5 ± 1.6 | 6 | 1.4 ± 2.6 |
| Malaise | 2 | 2.2 ± 2.4 | 5 | 1.8 ± 1.4 | 1 | 0.7 |
| Myalgia | 2 | 3.7 ± 3.2 | 2 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| Nausea | 3 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 5 | 0.9 ± 0.9 | 3 | 1.0 ± 0.9 |
| Vomiting | 0 | N/A | 2 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0 | N/A |
| Any | 6 | 2.0 ± 1.4 | 6 | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 6 | 1.1 ± 1.0 |
| Grade 3 adverse event | ||||||
| Fatigue | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A | 1 | 2.2 |
| Fever | 0 | N/A | 1 | 1.2 | 0 | N/A |
| Headache | 2 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 0 | N/A | 0 | N/A |
| Malaise | 1 | 4.8 | 0 | N/A | 1 | 0.1 |
| Vomiting | 0 | N/A | 2 | 0.01 ± 0.0 | 0 | N/A |
| Any | 2 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 3 | 0.6 ± 0.0 | 2 | 1.2 ± 0.0 |
There were few AEs before Day 7 (Figure 2). Thus, administration of PfSPZ Challenge was well tolerated. The AEs were expected and attributed to malaria.
N/A = not applicable.
Figure 2.Number of possibly, probably, or definitely related solicited and unsolicited adverse events reported over time in the 2,500 (black dashed), 10,000 (red dotted), and 25,000 PfSPZ Challenge dose (green straight) groups.
Infectivity in mice of purified, cryopreserved PySPZ administered IV or ID*
| Intravenous (IV) | Intradermal (ID) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of PySPZ Injected | Number of mice | Proportion infected | No. of PySPZ injected | Number of mice | Proportion infected | ||
| Infected | Injected | Infected | Injected | ||||
| 33 | 2 | 5 | 40% | 200 | 2 | 5 | 40% |
| 100 | 1 | 5 | 20% | 600 | 3 | 5 | 60% |
| 300 | 5 | 5 | 100% | 1800 | 3 | 5 | 60% |
| 900 | 5 | 5 | 100% | 5400 | 4 | 5 | 80% |
| 80% infectious dose = 257 PySPZ | 80% infectious dose = 5871 PySPZ | ||||||
| 100% infectious dose = 528 PySPZ | 100% infectious dose = N/A | ||||||
Purified, cryopreserved PySPZ were injected IV in the tail vein or ID at the base of the tail of 6–8 week old BALB/c. Infection was determined by examination of blood smears on Days 7 and 14 after inoculation. The 80% and 100% infectious doses were calculated using CurveExpert version 1.4.
Effect of cryopreservation on sporozoite membrane integrity and infectivity in mice inoculated intravenously with the same lot of P. yoelii sporozoites (PySPZ). Infectivity was the number of PySPZ required to infect 50% of BALB/c mice*
| Date | Status of PySPZ | Viability (SMIA) | Number of PySPZ inoculated (IV) | ID50 (number of PySPZ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2009 | fresh | 96.3% | 24-12-6-3 | 8.9 |
| Dec 2009 | cryopreserved | 72.7% | 200-100-50-25 | 33.1 |
| Dec 2009 | cryopreserved | 68.3% | 200-100-50-25 | 62.1 |
| Jan 2010 | cryopreserved | 67.7% | 400-200-100-50-25 | 103.8 |
| Feb 2010 | cryopreserved | 67.1% | 400-200-100-50-25 | 55.2 |
| Feb 2010 | cryopreserved | 71.6% | 400-200-100-50-25 | 107 |
| Feb 2010 | cryopreserved | 73.9% | 400-200-100-50-25 | 34.5 |
| Mean | cryopreserved | 70.2% | 66.0 | |
| Difference between fresh and cryopreserved PySPZ | 26.1% | 7.4-fold | ||
Freshly dissected, purified P. yoelii sporozoites (PySPZ) were assessed by the sporozoite membrane integrity assay (SMIA) as a measure of viability, and administered to BALB/c mice by intravenous (IV) injection. The remaining PySPZ from the same lot were cryopreserved, thawed at six different time points, assessed for viability by SMIA, and administered IV to mice. To provide data for calculation of the number of PySPZ that infected 50% of mice (ID50 calculated using an exponential association model y = a(1-e−bx)) (CurveExpert version 1.4) with fresh and cryopreserved PySPZ, groups of five mice each received PySPZ in de-escalating doses as indicated, and their infection status was determined by assessing Giemsa-stained blood smears 7–14 days after inoculation. The viability by SMIA of purified, cryopreserved PySPZ was reduced 26.1% as compared with fresh, purified PySPZ. The cryopreserved PySPZ were 7.4-fold less infective than fresh PySPZ as it took 7.4 times more cryopreserved PySPZ to achieve 50% infection of mice.