Literature DB >> 23149535

Reconciling primary care and specialist perspectives on prostate cancer screening.

Richard M Hoffman1, Michael J Barry, Richard G Roberts, Harold C Sox.   

Abstract

When specialists propose screening guidelines for primary care clinicians to implement, differences in perspectives between the 2 groups can create conflicts. Two recent specialty organization guidelines illustrate this issue. The American Urological Association guideline panel and National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend that average-risk men first be counseled about the risks and benefits of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer at age 40 rather than at the previously recommended age of 50 years. There is no direct evidence, however, that this recommendation has any impact on prostate cancer-specific mortality. To avoid distracting primary care clinicians from providing services with proven benefit and value for patients, professional organizations should follow appropriate standards for developing guidelines. Primary care societies and health care systems should also be encouraged to evaluate the evidence and decide whether implementing the recommendations are feasible and appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23149535      PMCID: PMC3495932          DOI: 10.1370/afm.1399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  22 in total

1.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  A piece of my mind. Winners and losers.

Authors:  Daniel Merenstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Informed consent for PSA screening: does it happen?

Authors:  D G Federman; S Goyal; A Kamina; P Peduzzi; J Concato
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

5.  Defining and updating the American Cancer Society guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: prostate and endometrial cancers.

Authors:  C Mettlin; G Jones; H Averette; S B Gusberg; G P Murphy
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Prostate cancer in men age 50 years or younger: a review of the Department of Defense Center for Prostate Disease Research multicenter prostate cancer database.

Authors:  C V Smith; J J Bauer; R R Connelly; T Seay; C Kane; J Foley; J B Thrasher; L Kusuda; J W Moul
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy men. Establishment of age-specific reference ranges.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; S J Jacobsen; C G Chute; H A Guess; C J Girman; L A Panser; M M Lieber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Long-term cancer control of radical prostatectomy in men younger than 50 years of age: update 2003.

Authors:  Masood A Khan; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Jonathan I Epstein; Patrick C Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Influence of age and prostate-specific antigen on the chance of curable prostate cancer among men with nonpalpable disease.

Authors:  H B Carter; J I Epstein; A W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study.

Authors:  Carmen E Guerra; Samantha E Jacobs; John H Holmes; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  Generalism: the princess and the pea.

Authors:  Martina Kelly; Lara Nixon; Laura Nixon; Wendy Tink
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The price of false beliefs: unrealistic expectations as a contributor to the health care crisis.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Perceptions about screening for prostate cancer using genetic lifetime risk assessment: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Pia Kirkegaard; Adrian Edwards; Trine Laura Overgaard Nielsen; Torben Falck Ørntoft; Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen; Michael Borre; Flemming Bro
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.