PURPOSE: Imaging may produce unexpected or incidental findings with consequences for patients and ordering of future investigations. Chest radiography in patients with acute cough is among the most common reasons for imaging in primary care, but data on associated incidental findings are lacking. We set out to describe the type and prevalence of incidental chest radiography findings in primary care patients with acute cough. METHODS: We report on data from a cross-sectional study in 16 European primary care networks on 3,105 patients with acute cough, all of whom were undergoing chest radiography as part of a research study workup. Apart from assessment for specified signs of pneumonia and acute bronchitis, local radiologists were asked to evaluate any additional finding on the radiographs. For the 2,823 participants with good-quality chest radiographs, these findings were categorized according to clinical relevance based on previous research evidence and analyzed for type and prevalence by network, sex, age, and smoking status. RESULTS: Incidental findings were reported in 19% of all participants, and ranged from 0% to 25% by primary care network, with the network being an independent contributor (P <.001). Of all participants 3% had clinically relevant incidental findings. Suspected nodules and shadows were reported in 1.8%. Incidental findings were more common is older participants and smokers (P <. 001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant incidental findings on chest radiographs in primary care adult patients with acute cough are uncommon, and prevalence varies by setting.
PURPOSE: Imaging may produce unexpected or incidental findings with consequences for patients and ordering of future investigations. Chest radiography in patients with acute cough is among the most common reasons for imaging in primary care, but data on associated incidental findings are lacking. We set out to describe the type and prevalence of incidental chest radiography findings in primary care patients with acute cough. METHODS: We report on data from a cross-sectional study in 16 European primary care networks on 3,105 patients with acute cough, all of whom were undergoing chest radiography as part of a research study workup. Apart from assessment for specified signs of pneumonia and acute bronchitis, local radiologists were asked to evaluate any additional finding on the radiographs. For the 2,823 participants with good-quality chest radiographs, these findings were categorized according to clinical relevance based on previous research evidence and analyzed for type and prevalence by network, sex, age, and smoking status. RESULTS: Incidental findings were reported in 19% of all participants, and ranged from 0% to 25% by primary care network, with the network being an independent contributor (P <.001). Of all participants 3% had clinically relevant incidental findings. Suspected nodules and shadows were reported in 1.8%. Incidental findings were more common is older participants and smokers (P <. 001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant incidental findings on chest radiographs in primary care adult patients with acute cough are uncommon, and prevalence varies by setting.
Authors: Thomas M Gluecker; C Daniel Johnson; Lynn A Wilson; Robert L Maccarty; Timothy J Welch; David J Vanness; David A Ahlquist Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Nicholas M Orme; Joel G Fletcher; Hassan A Siddiki; W Scott Harmsen; Megan M O'Byrne; John D Port; William J Tremaine; Henry C Pitot; Elizabeth G McFarland; Marguerite E Robinson; Barbara A Koenig; Bernard F King; Susan M Wolf Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2010-09-27
Authors: J Macfarlane; W Holmes; P Gard; R Macfarlane; D Rose; V Weston; M Leinonen; P Saikku; S Myint Journal: Thorax Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: JoAnn Lindenfeld; Nancy M Albert; John P Boehmer; Sean P Collins; Justin A Ezekowitz; Michael M Givertz; Stuart D Katz; Marc Klapholz; Debra K Moser; Joseph G Rogers; Randall C Starling; William G Stevenson; W H Wilson Tang; John R Teerlink; Mary N Walsh Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Klaus F Rabe; Suzanne Hurd; Antonio Anzueto; Peter J Barnes; Sonia A Buist; Peter Calverley; Yoshinosuke Fukuchi; Christine Jenkins; Roberto Rodriguez-Roisin; Chris van Weel; Jan Zielinski Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2007-05-16 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: C C Butler; K Hood; T Verheij; P Little; H Melbye; J Nuttall; M J Kelly; S Mölstad; M Godycki-Cwirko; J Almirall; A Torres; D Gillespie; U Rautakorpi; S Coenen; H Goossens Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-06-23
Authors: Jolien Teepe; Berna D L Broekhuizen; Katherine Loens; Christine Lammens; Margareta Ieven; Herman Goossens; Paul Little; Chris C Butler; Samuel Coenen; Maciek Godycki-Cwirko; Theo J M Verheij Journal: CMAJ Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Lily Wood; Christopher Martin; David Polly; Samuel Luchsinger; Takashi Takahashi Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 1.930
Authors: Geert H Groeneveld; Robert J van de Peppel; Margot W M de Waal; Theo J M Verheij; Jaap T van Dissel Journal: Eur J Gen Pract Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 1.904