Literature DB >> 23149360

Impact of the prehospital activation strategy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous revascularization: a single center community hospital experience.

Sofia A Horvath1, Ke Xu, Francis Nwanyanwu, Richard Chan, Luis Correa, Nouri Nass, Abdul-Rahman Jaraki, David Jurkovich, Richard Kennedy, Lee Andrzejewski, Paul A Vignola, Roberto J Cubeddu.   

Abstract

The strategy of prehospital activation by the emergency medical system (EMS) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been poorly adopted among the US hospitals that currently offer 24/7 primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In this study, we report a single center experience after the implementation of this strategy. From 2008 to 2011, we identified a total 188 STEMI patients (age 65 ± 15 years) presenting via EMS for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Of these, 112 (59.6%) underwent prehospital activation (EMS group), whereas the remaining 76 (40.4%) underwent emergency department activation [emergency department (ED) group]. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between both groups. The overall median door-to-balloon (DTB) time was 49 ± 14 minutes. Patients undergoing prehospital activation had on average significantly lower overall DTB times (EMS 44 ± 11 minutes vs. ED 57 ± 15 minutes; P < 0.001). Concordantly, DTB times <60 minutes were much more commonly achieved with this strategy (EMS 95.5% vs. ED 64.5%; P < 0.001). Fallouts beyond the recommended 90-minute DTB time were seen among ED patients only. No difference in in-hospital death (EMS 5.4% vs. ED 6.6%; P = 0.75) or cumulative 30-day mortality (EMS 6.3% vs. ED 7.9%; P = 0.68) was observed between both groups. However, on average, EMS patients had higher postinfarct left ventricular ejection fraction (EMS 48 ± 9.5% vs. ED 39 ± 14.6%; P = 0.004). Differences in DTB time and left ventricular ejection fraction remained significant after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics. In conclusion, the prehospital activation strategy is largely effective and should be systematically adopted in the treatment scheme of STEMI patients to lower mechanical reperfusion times and reduce the potential for untoward clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23149360     DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182647df7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol        ISSN: 1535-2811


  3 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Prehospital 12-Lead Electrocardiography and Destination Hospital Notification on Mortality in Patients With Chest Pain - A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Takahiro Nakashima; Katsutaka Hashiba; Migaku Kikuchi; Junichi Yamaguchi; Sunao Kojima; Hiroyuki Hanada; Toshiaki Mano; Takeshi Yamamoto; Akihito Tanaka; Kunihiro Matsuo; Naoki Nakayama; Osamu Nomura; Tetsuya Matoba; Yoshio Tahara; Hiroshi Nonogi
Journal:  Circ Rep       Date:  2022-04-15

Review 2.  Chest Pain of Suspected Cardiac Origin: Current Evidence-based Recommendations for Prehospital Care.

Authors:  P Brian Savino; Karl A Sporer; Joe A Barger; John F Brown; Gregory H Gilbert; Kristi L Koenig; Eric M Rudnick; Angelo A Salvucci
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-12-11

Review 3.  Prehospital Activation of the Catheterization Laboratory Among Patients With Suspected ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Outside of a Hospital - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katsutaka Hashiba; Takahiro Nakashima; Migaku Kikuchi; Sunao Kojima; Hiroyuki Hanada; Toshiaki Mano; Takeshi Yamamoto; Akihito Tanaka; Junichi Yamaguchi; Kunihiro Matsuo; Naoki Nakayama; Osamu Nomura; Tetsuya Matoba; Yoshio Tahara; Hiroshi Nonogi
Journal:  Circ Rep       Date:  2022-07-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.