Kevin S Masters1, Stephanie A Hooker. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, CO 80217-3364, USA. kevin.masters@ucdenver.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recently, behavioral scientists have developed greater interest in understanding the relations between religiousness and spirituality (R/S) and health. Our objectives were to (a) provide an overview of the R/S and health literature specific to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer, (b) discuss the importance of religious culture considerations to behavioral medicine research, (c) suggest methodological changes to advance this research toward greater depth of understanding, and (d) begin discussion on clinically appropriate ways to integrate R/S into treatment. METHOD: Individual studies and meta-analyses on the relations of R/S with CVD and cancer were reviewed along with articles on the importance of culture to understanding R/S phenomena. RESULTS: Trends in the literature suggest that R/S predicts reductions in all-cause and CVD-related but not cancer mortality. R/S also shows relations with cardiovascular morbidity, and various dimensions of R/S show relations with cancer risk factors and well-being in cancer patients. Investigators have progressively studied more specific dimensions of R/S but have largely failed to consider them within religious cultural contexts. This context is essential for a deeper understanding of R/S and health relations and has profound methodological implications for future studies. CONCLUSIONS: R/S and health research is expanding; yet, the field needs more programmatic research and greater theoretical organization. We propose that consideration of R/S variables within their religious culture will provide structure for greater integrative understanding to move the field forward. This understanding is imperative if R/S is to be appropriately integrated into culturally sensitive clinical interventions.
OBJECTIVE: Recently, behavioral scientists have developed greater interest in understanding the relations between religiousness and spirituality (R/S) and health. Our objectives were to (a) provide an overview of the R/S and health literature specific to cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer, (b) discuss the importance of religious culture considerations to behavioral medicine research, (c) suggest methodological changes to advance this research toward greater depth of understanding, and (d) begin discussion on clinically appropriate ways to integrate R/S into treatment. METHOD: Individual studies and meta-analyses on the relations of R/S with CVD and cancer were reviewed along with articles on the importance of culture to understanding R/S phenomena. RESULTS: Trends in the literature suggest that R/S predicts reductions in all-cause and CVD-related but not cancer mortality. R/S also shows relations with cardiovascular morbidity, and various dimensions of R/S show relations with cancer risk factors and well-being in cancerpatients. Investigators have progressively studied more specific dimensions of R/S but have largely failed to consider them within religious cultural contexts. This context is essential for a deeper understanding of R/S and health relations and has profound methodological implications for future studies. CONCLUSIONS: R/S and health research is expanding; yet, the field needs more programmatic research and greater theoretical organization. We propose that consideration of R/S variables within their religious culture will provide structure for greater integrative understanding to move the field forward. This understanding is imperative if R/S is to be appropriately integrated into culturally sensitive clinical interventions.
Authors: Claire C Conley; Brent J Small; Juliette Christie; Aasha I Hoogland; Bianca M Augusto; Jennifer D Garcia; Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-05-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Karen H K Yeary; Kassandra I Alcaraz; Kimlin Tam Ashing; Chungyi Chiu; Shannon M Christy; Katarina Friberg Felsted; Qian Lu; Crystal Y Lumpkins; Kevin S Masters; Robert L Newton; Crystal L Park; Megan J Shen; Valerie J Silfee; Betina Yanez; Jean Yi Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Paul J Mills; Kathleen Wilson; Navaid Iqbal; Fatima Iqbal; Milagros Alvarez; Meredith A Pung; Katherine Wachmann; Thomas Rutledge; Jeanne Maglione; Sid Zisook; Joel E Dimsdale; Ottar Lunde; Barry H Greenberg; Alan Maisel; Ajit Raisinghani; Loki Natarajan; Shamini Jain; David J Hufford; Laura Redwine Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2014-12-23
Authors: Heather S L Jim; James E Pustejovsky; Crystal L Park; Suzanne C Danhauer; Allen C Sherman; George Fitchett; Thomas V Merluzzi; Alexis R Munoz; Login George; Mallory A Snyder; John M Salsman Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Crystal L Park; Kevin S Masters; John M Salsman; Amy Wachholtz; Andrea D Clements; Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Kelly Trevino; Danielle M Wischenka Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2016-06-24
Authors: Stephanie A Hooker; Kaile Ross; Kevin S Masters; Crystal L Park; Amy E Hale; Larry A Allen; David B Bekelman Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2017 May/Jun Impact factor: 2.083