Literature DB >> 23148742

Parameter variability and distributional assumptions in the diffusion model.

Roger Ratcliff1.   

Abstract

If the diffusion model (Ratcliff & McKoon, 2008) is to account for the relative speeds of correct responses and errors, it is necessary that the components of processing identified by the model vary across the trials of a task. In standard applications, the rate at which information is accumulated by the diffusion process is assumed to be normally distributed across trials, the starting point for the process is assumed to be uniformly distributed across trials, and the time taken by processes outside the diffusion process is assumed to be uniformly distributed. With the studies in this article, I explore the consequences of alternative assumptions about the distributions, using a wide range of parameter values. The model with the standard assumptions was fit to predictions generated with the alternative assumptions, and the results showed that the recovered parameter values matched the values used to generate the predictions with only a few exceptions. These occurred when parameter combinations were extreme and when a skewed distribution (exponential) of nondecision times was used. The conclusion is that the standard model is robust to moderate changes in the across-trial distributions of parameter values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148742      PMCID: PMC3975928          DOI: 10.1037/a0030775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  46 in total

1.  Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: approaches to dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Francis Tuerlinckx
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

2.  A diffusion model analysis of the effects of aging on brightness discrimination.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-05

3.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 4.  The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence.

Authors:  Florian Schmiedek; Klaus Oberauer; Oliver Wilhelm; Heinz-Martin Süss; Werner W Wittmann
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

6.  Quality of evidence for perceptual decision making is indexed by trial-to-trial variability of the EEG.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Marios G Philiastides; Paul Sajda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Using diffusion models to understand clinical disorders.

Authors:  Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff; Michael W Vasey; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.223

8.  Modeling the effects of hypoglycemia on a two-choice task in adult humans.

Authors:  Jacqueline Geddes; Roger Ratcliff; Michael Allerhand; Russ Childers; Rohana J Wright; Brian M Frier; Ian J Deary
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Neural control of voluntary movement initiation.

Authors:  D P Hanes; J D Schall
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  31 in total

1.  Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 2.  The diffusion model is not a deterministic growth model: comment on Jones and Dzhafarov (2014).

Authors:  Philip L Smith; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Combining error-driven models of associative learning with evidence accumulation models of decision-making.

Authors:  David K Sewell; Hayley K Jach; Russell J Boag; Christina A Van Heer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

4.  Determining informative priors for cognitive models.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Wolf Vanpaemel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

5.  Decision making on spatially continuous scales.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Modeling individual differences in response time and accuracy in numeracy.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Clarissa A Thompson; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-01-29

7.  A model-based quantification of action control deficits in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mathieu Servant; Nelleke van Wouwe; Scott A Wylie; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A single trial analysis of EEG in recognition memory: Tracking the neural correlates of memory strength.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Per B Sederberg; Troy A Smith; Russ Childers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 10.  Diffusion Decision Model: Current Issues and History.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Philip L Smith; Scott D Brown; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.