Literature DB >> 23148447

The role of molecular diagnostics in implant-associated bone and joint infection.

P-Y Lévy1, F Fenollar.   

Abstract

Microbiological culture is the conventional method for establishing the diagnosis in implant-associated bone and joint infection, but it may lack both specificity and sensitivity. Molecular diagnosis has been an important step in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. We review the principles and the role of molecular diagnosis in improving the aetiological diagnosis of implant-associated bone and joint infection. Currently, molecular diagnosis mainly includes conventional broad-range PCR and specific PCR assays. These tools are efficient, but several pitfalls exist that necessitate rigour in all steps of the process. In implant-associated bone and joint infection, molecular assays have been shown to be useful in complementing culture techniques to identify microorganisms when patients have previously received antibiotics or in the presence of fastidious microorganisms. Broad-range PCR targeting the 16S rRNA sequence followed by sequencing must be performed in culture-negative specimens when infection is suspected on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms or inflammatory syndrome. This molecular tool has allowed not only increasing identification of anaerobic bacteria, such as Finegoldia magna, but also the discovery of the role of Tropheryma whipplei, an aetiological agent of implant-associated bone and joint infection in patients without Whipple's disease. Real-time pathogen-specific PCR assays performed in a closed system are more sensitive and specific than broad-range PCR, but each assay is typically able to detect only a single microorganism. These assays should be performed to confirm the identification provided by broad-spectrum PCR, and also when broad-range PCR fails to detect a microorganism despite efficient DNA extraction.
© 2012 The Authors. Clinical Microbiology and Infection © 2012 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148447     DOI: 10.1111/1469-0691.12020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  18 in total

1.  Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections using UMD-Universal Kit and the automated multiplex-PCR Unyvero i60 ITI(®) cartridge system: a pilot study.

Authors:  Johannes P Borde; Georg A Häcker; Sina Guschl; Annerose Serr; Tobias Danner; Johannes Hübner; Sandra Burrack-Lange; Gerd Lüdke; Peter Helwig; Oliver Hauschild; Winfried V Kern
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  First experience of a multicenter external quality assessment of molecular 16S rRNA gene detection in bone and joint infections.

Authors:  Chloé Plouzeau; Pascale Bémer; Anne Sophie Valentin; Geneviève Héry-Arnaud; Didier Tandé; Anne Jolivet-Gougeon; Pascal Vincent; Marie Kempf; Carole Lemarié; Jérôme Guinard; Laurent Bret; Anne Sophie Cognée; Sophie Gibaud; Christophe Burucoa; Stéphane Corvec
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Complementarity between targeted real-time specific PCR and conventional broad-range 16S rDNA PCR in the syndrome-driven diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Authors:  A-S Morel; G Dubourg; E Prudent; S Edouard; F Gouriet; J-P Casalta; F Fenollar; P E Fournier; M Drancourt; D Raoult
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Lack of Additional Diagnostic Yield of 16s rRNA Gene PCR for Prosthetic Joint Infections.

Authors:  Michael A Lane; Neeraja Ganeshraj; Alice Gu; David K Warren; Carey-Ann D Burnham
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2019-02-26

5.  Finegoldia magna Isolated from Orthopedic Joint Implant-Associated Infections.

Authors:  Bo Söderquist; Sanna Björklund; Bengt Hellmark; Anders Jensen; Holger Brüggemann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Bone and joint infections due to anaerobic bacteria: an analysis of 61 cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  G Walter; M Vernier; P O Pinelli; M Million; M Coulange; P Seng; A Stein
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Evaluation of 16S rRNA gene PCR sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a prospective multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Pascale Bémer; Chloé Plouzeau; Didier Tande; Julie Léger; Bruno Giraudeau; Anne Sophie Valentin; Anne Jolivet-Gougeon; Pascal Vincent; Stéphane Corvec; Sophie Gibaud; Marie Emmanuelle Juvin; Genevieve Héry-Arnaud; Carole Lemarié; Marie Kempf; Laurent Bret; Roland Quentin; Carine Coffre; Gonzague de Pinieux; Louis Bernard; Christophe Burucoa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Biofilms in periprosthetic orthopedic infections.

Authors:  Stephen J McConoughey; Rob Howlin; Jeff F Granger; Maurice M Manring; Jason H Calhoun; Mark Shirtliff; Sandeep Kathju; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.165

Review 9.  The role of microbial biofilms in prosthetic joint infections.

Authors:  Herbert O Gbejuade; Andrew M Lovering; Jason C Webb
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Using PET/CT Bone Scan Dynamic Data to Evaluate Tibia Remodeling When a Taylor Spatial Frame Is Used: Short and Longer Term Differences.

Authors:  Henrik Lundblad; Gerald Q Maguire; Charlotte Karlsson-Thur; Cathrine Jonsson; Marilyn E Noz; Michael P Zeleznik; Hans Jacobsson; Lars Weidenhielm
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.