Literature DB >> 23148252

Heritability and Bayesian genome-wide association study of first service conception and pregnancy in Brangus heifers.

S O Peters1, K Kizilkaya, D J Garrick, R L Fernando, J M Reecy, R L Weaber, G A Silver, M G Thomas.   

Abstract

Brangus [3/8 Brahman (Bos indicus) × 5/8 Angus (Bos taurus); n ≈ 800] heifers from 67 sires were used to estimate heritability and conduct a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for 2 binary fertility traits: first service conception (FSC) and heifer pregnancy (HPG). Genotypes were from 53,692 loci on the BovineSNP50 (Infinium Bead Chips, Illumina, San Diego, CA). Yearling heifers were estrous synchronized, bred by AI, and then exposed to natural service breeding. Reproductive ultrasound and DNA-based parentage testing were used to determine if the heifer conceived by AI or natural service, and code for FSC and HPG traits. Success rates for FSC and HPG were 53.3% and 78.0% ± 0.01%, and corresponding heritability estimates were 0.18 ± 0.07 and 0.10 ± 0.06, respectively. The models used in obtaining these heritability estimates and GWAS included fixed effects of year (i.e., 2005 to 2007), birth location, calving season, age of dam, and contemporary group. In GWAS, simultaneous associations of 1 Mb SNP windows with phenotype were undertaken with Bayes C analyses using GenSel software. The 1 Mb windows contained 21.3 ± 1.1 SNP. Analyses fitted a mixture model that treated SNP effects as random, with an assumed fraction pi = 0.9995 having no effect on phenotype. The windows that accounted for 1.0% of genetic variance were considered as QTL associated with FSC or HPG. Eighteen QTL existed on 15 chromosomes for the 2 traits. On average, each QTL accounted for 2.43% ± 0.2% of the genetic variance. Chromosome 8 harbored 2 QTL for FSC and 1 for HPG; however, these regions did not overlap. Chromosomes 3, 15, 16, 19, 24, 26, 27, 29, and X included QTL only for FSC, whereas chromosomes 2, 4, 10, 13, and 20 contained QTL only for HPG. The multitude of QTL detected for FSC and HPG in this GWAS involving Brangus heifers exemplifies the complex regulation of variation in heifer fertility traits of low heritability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148252     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5580

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  22 in total

1.  Genetic parameters for fertility and production traits in Red Angus cattle.

Authors:  Ryan J Boldt; Scott E Speidel; Milton G Thomas; R Mark Enns
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Genome-Wide Association Analysis Reveals the Genetic Architecture of Parasite (Cryptocaryon irritans) Resistance in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea).

Authors:  Ji Zhao; Tao Zhou; Huaqiang Bai; Qiaozhen Ke; Bijun Li; Mindong Bai; Zhixiong Zhou; Fei Pu; Weiqiang Zheng; Peng Xu
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Genome-wide association study of Stayability and Heifer Pregnancy in Red Angus cattle.

Authors:  S E Speidel; B A Buckley; R J Boldt; R M Enns; J Lee; M L Spangler; M G Thomas
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Multi-tissue omics analyses reveal molecular regulatory networks for puberty in composite beef cattle.

Authors:  Angela Cánovas; Antonio Reverter; Kasey L DeAtley; Ryan L Ashley; Michelle L Colgrave; Marina R S Fortes; Alma Islas-Trejo; Sigrid Lehnert; Laercio Porto-Neto; Gonzalo Rincón; Gail A Silver; Warren M Snelling; Juan F Medrano; Milton G Thomas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Identification of genomic regions associated with feed efficiency in Nelore cattle.

Authors:  Priscila S N de Oliveira; Aline S M Cesar; Michele L do Nascimento; Amália S Chaves; Polyana C Tizioto; Rymer R Tullio; Dante P D Lanna; Antonio N Rosa; Tad S Sonstegard; Gerson B Mourao; James M Reecy; Dorian J Garrick; Maurício A Mudadu; Luiz L Coutinho; Luciana C A Regitano
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.797

6.  Assessing the value of phenotypic information from non-genotyped animals for QTL mapping of complex traits in real and simulated populations.

Authors:  Thaise P Melo; Luciana Takada; Fernando Baldi; Henrique N Oliveira; Marina M Dias; Haroldo H R Neves; Flavio S Schenkel; Lucia G Albuquerque; Roberto Carvalheiro
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  A high plane of nutrition during early life alters the hypothalamic transcriptome of heifer calves.

Authors:  José M Sánchez; Kate Keogh; Alan K Kelly; Colin J Byrne; Pat Lonergan; David A Kenny
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  QTL fine mapping with Bayes C(π): a simulation study.

Authors:  Irene van den Berg; Sébastien Fritz; Didier Boichard
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations.

Authors:  Kadir Kizilkaya; Rohan L Fernando; Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  A Genome Wide Association Study on Age at First Calving Using High Density Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Chips in Hanwoo (Bos taurus coreanae).

Authors:  K-E Hyeong; A Iqbal; J-J Kim
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.509

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.