OBJECTIVE: To compare results of clinical trials that assessed the impact of near-normalization of glucose on microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: ACCORD (N = 10,234) and ADVANCE (N = 11,140) tested the hypothesis that near-normalization of glucose reduces microvascular complications in adults with established type 2 diabetes. Differences in incidence rates (intensive versus standard glucose control) for specific microvascular complications are expressed as 'number needed to treat' (NNT) to prevent one microvascular complication. The impact of blood pressure (BP) control and fenofibrate use on microvascular complications was also assessed. RESULTS: In ADVANCE, near-normalization of glucose reduced new or worsening nephropathy (NNT = 77 for 5 years to prevent one occurrence), but not eye or foot complications. In ACCORD, near-normalization of glucose did not reduce prespecified composite measures of advanced microvascular complications, and impact on secondary microvascular outcomes was mixed. The ancillary ACCORD Eye Study found reduced progression in retinopathy with near-normalization of glucose (NNT = 32 for 4 years), and with blinded fenofibrate therapy (NNT = 27 for 4 years), but neither intervention reduced vision loss. ADVANCE showed a benefit of intensive BP control (mean BP 133/70 mmHg) on microvascular complications, independent of glucose control. CONCLUSIONS: End-stage microvascular complications were not altered by near-normalization of glucose. Some early manifestations of microvascular complications were reduced, with inconsistencies across studies in which were affected. These early and inconsistent micro-vascular effects must be weighed against significantly increased severe hypoglycemia, weight gain, and (in ACCORD) increased total mortality (NNT = 94 for 3.5 years for one excess death) consistently found in all prespecified patient subgroups. Alternative clinical strategies, such as moderate BP control or fenofibrate treatment may reduce microvascular complications independent of glucose control. The data strongly support personalized glucose control goals based on clinical factors and patient preferences for outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To compare results of clinical trials that assessed the impact of near-normalization of glucose on microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: ACCORD (N = 10,234) and ADVANCE (N = 11,140) tested the hypothesis that near-normalization of glucose reduces microvascular complications in adults with established type 2 diabetes. Differences in incidence rates (intensive versus standard glucose control) for specific microvascular complications are expressed as 'number needed to treat' (NNT) to prevent one microvascular complication. The impact of blood pressure (BP) control and fenofibrate use on microvascular complications was also assessed. RESULTS: In ADVANCE, near-normalization of glucose reduced new or worsening nephropathy (NNT = 77 for 5 years to prevent one occurrence), but not eye or foot complications. In ACCORD, near-normalization of glucose did not reduce prespecified composite measures of advanced microvascular complications, and impact on secondary microvascular outcomes was mixed. The ancillary ACCORD Eye Study found reduced progression in retinopathy with near-normalization of glucose (NNT = 32 for 4 years), and with blinded fenofibrate therapy (NNT = 27 for 4 years), but neither intervention reduced vision loss. ADVANCE showed a benefit of intensive BP control (mean BP 133/70 mmHg) on microvascular complications, independent of glucose control. CONCLUSIONS: End-stage microvascular complications were not altered by near-normalization of glucose. Some early manifestations of microvascular complications were reduced, with inconsistencies across studies in which were affected. These early and inconsistent micro-vascular effects must be weighed against significantly increased severe hypoglycemia, weight gain, and (in ACCORD) increased total mortality (NNT = 94 for 3.5 years for one excess death) consistently found in all prespecified patient subgroups. Alternative clinical strategies, such as moderate BP control or fenofibrate treatment may reduce microvascular complications independent of glucose control. The data strongly support personalized glucose control goals based on clinical factors and patient preferences for outcomes.
Authors: Anushka Patel; Stephen MacMahon; John Chalmers; Bruce Neal; Laurent Billot; Mark Woodward; Michel Marre; Mark Cooper; Paul Glasziou; Diederick Grobbee; Pavel Hamet; Stephen Harrap; Simon Heller; Lisheng Liu; Giuseppe Mancia; Carl Erik Mogensen; Changyu Pan; Neil Poulter; Anthony Rodgers; Bryan Williams; Severine Bompoint; Bastiaan E de Galan; Rohina Joshi; Florence Travert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William C Cushman; Gregory W Evans; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey A Cutler; Denise G Simons-Morton; Jan N Basile; Marshall A Corson; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Lois Katz; Kevin A Peterson; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; J Thomas Bigger; Hertzel C Gerstein; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Henry N Ginsberg; Marshall B Elam; Laura C Lovato; John R Crouse; Lawrence A Leiter; Peter Linz; William T Friedewald; John B Buse; Hertzel C Gerstein; Jeffrey Probstfield; Richard H Grimm; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; J Thomas Bigger; David C Goff; William C Cushman; Denise G Simons-Morton; Robert P Byington Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rury R Holman; Sanjoy K Paul; M Angelyn Bethel; David R Matthews; H Andrew W Neil Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Hertzel C Gerstein; Michael E Miller; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; J Thomas Bigger; John B Buse; William C Cushman; Saul Genuth; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Denise G Simons-Morton; William T Friedewald Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-06-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter Gaede; Pernille Vedel; Nicolai Larsen; Gunnar V H Jensen; Hans-Henrik Parving; Oluf Pedersen Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul M Ridker; Jean G MacFadyen; Francisco A H Fonseca; Jacques Genest; Antonio M Gotto; John J P Kastelein; Wolfgang Koenig; Peter Libby; Alberto J Lorenzatti; Børge G Nordestgaard; James Shepherd; James T Willerson; Robert J Glynn Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2009-09-22
Authors: Sophia Zoungas; Bastiaan E de Galan; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Diederick Grobbee; Pavel Hamet; Simon Heller; Stephen MacMahon; Michel Marre; Bruce Neal; Anushka Patel; Mark Woodward; John Chalmers; Alan Cass; Paul Glasziou; Stephen Harrap; Liu Lisheng; Guiseppe Mancia; Avinesh Pillai; Neil Poulter; Vlado Perkovic; Florence Travert Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2009-08-03 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Adrian T Billeter; Stefan Kopf; Martin Zeier; Katharina Scheurlen; Lars Fischer; Thilo M Schulte; Hannes G Kenngott; Barbara Israel; Philipp Knefeli; Markus W Büchler; Peter P Nawroth; Beat P Müller-Stich Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Kieren J Mather; Ionut Bebu; Chelsea Baker; Robert M Cohen; Jill P Crandall; Cyrus DeSouza; Jennifer B Green; M Sue Kirkman; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; Mary Larkin; Jeremy Pettus; Elizabeth R Seaquist; Elsayed Z Soliman; Emily B Schroeder; Deborah J Wexler; Rodica Pop-Busui Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2020-05-23 Impact factor: 5.602