Literature DB >> 23148089

Factors limiting participation in arthritis self-management programmes: an exploration of barriers and patient preferences within a randomized controlled trial.

Ilana N Ackerman1, Rachelle Buchbinder, Richard H Osborne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve understanding of barriers to participation in community-based arthritis self-management programmes and patient preferences for self-management education.
METHODS: Individuals with hip or knee OA referred to orthopaedic surgeons or rheumatologists at six public and private hospitals in Victoria, Australia, were recruited for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the Stanford Arthritis Self-Management Programme (ASMP). As part of the study design, potential participants were asked during the screening and recruitment process about reasons for being unable to attend the course, reasons for not participating in the study and individual preferences for course scheduling.
RESULTS: Of 1125 individuals assessed, 216 (19%) were unable to attend six ASMP sessions. This was commonly due to physical limitations, including illness, restricted mobility and pain (22%), difficulty getting to or from courses (22%), work commitments (22%), the time commitment required (17%) and family roles (12%). Among those who did not want to participate in the study (n = 258), the overwhelming reason was disinterest (74%). Specific preferences for course scheduling were frequent, confirming the practical challenges faced in organizing courses for the RCT.
CONCLUSION: Incorporating patients from public and private settings, this study has elicited new insights into barriers to ASMP participation. Many people with hip or knee OA have limited capacity and motivation to attend community-based group programmes. Future self-management programmes and research should include more accessible options for those who cannot attend group-based programmes. Trial registration. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, http://www.anzctr.org.au/, ACTRN12606000174583.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148089     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  25 in total

1.  Successful recruitment methods in the community for a two-site clinical trial.

Authors:  Eileen Fairbanks; Shivani Shah; Mary H Wilde; Margaret V McDonald; Judith Brasch; James M McMahon
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 2.257

Review 2.  Core and adjunctive interventions for osteoarthritis: efficacy and models for implementation.

Authors:  Jocelyn L Bowden; David J Hunter; Leticia A Deveza; Vicky Duong; Krysia S Dziedzic; Kelli D Allen; Ping-Keung Chan; Jillian P Eyles
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 20.543

3.  Implementation of clinical guidelines for osteoarthritis together (IMPACT): protocol for a participatory health research approach to implementing high value care.

Authors:  Clodagh M Toomey; Norelee Kennedy; Anne MacFarlane; Liam Glynn; John Forbes; Soren T Skou; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a Fibromyalgia Self-management Programme for adults in a community setting with a nested qualitative study (FALCON).

Authors:  Jennifer Pearson; Jessica Coggins; Sandi Derham; Julie Russell; Nicola E Walsh; Erik Lenguerrand; Shea Palmer; Fiona Cramp
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 5.  The social (media) side to rheumatology.

Authors:  Francis Berenbaum
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 20.543

6.  Perceived value of a urinary catheter self-management program in the home.

Authors:  Mary H Wilde; Feng Zhang; Eileen Fairbanks; Shivani Shah; Margaret V McDonald; Judith Brasch
Journal:  Home Healthc Nurse       Date:  2013-10

7.  Assessment and patient selection process for a pain management programme: a case study in specialty care.

Authors:  Lucie D Knight; Beth J Guildford; Aisling Daly-Eichenhardt; Lance M McCracken
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2018-11-19

8.  Developing the Korean Educational Needs Assessment Tool (Korean ENAT) in rheumatoid arthritis: cross-cultural validation using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Hyoungyoung Kim; Sung Joo Cha; Sae-Hyung Kim; Mwidimi Ndosi; Soo-Kyung Cho
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.884

9.  Developing the Polish Educational Needs Assessment Tool (Pol-ENAT) in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic sclerosis: a cross-cultural validation study using Rasch analysis.

Authors:  Matylda Sierakowska; Stanisław Sierakowski; Justyna Sierakowska; Mike Horton; Mwidimi Ndosi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based pain self-management intervention for patients undergoing total hip replacement: feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Elsa Marques; Neil Artz; Ashley Blom; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.