Literature DB >> 23148025

Impact of postoperative morbidity on long-term survival after oesophagectomy.

M W Hii1, B M Smithers, D C Gotley, J M Thomas, I Thomson, I Martin, A P Barbour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal malignancy is a disease with a poor prognosis. Oesophagectomy is the mainstay of curative treatment but associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although mortality rates have improved, the incidence of perioperative morbidity remains high. This study assessed the impact of postoperative morbidity on long-term outcomes.
METHODS: A prospective database was designed for patients undergoing oesophagectomy for malignancy from 1998 to 2011. An observational cohort study was performed with these data, assessing intraoperative technical complications, postoperative morbidity and effects on overall survival.
RESULTS: Some 618 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 51 months for survivors. The overall complication rate was 64·6 per cent (399 of 618), with technical complications in 124 patients (20·1 per cent) and medical complications in 339 (54·9 per cent). Technical complications were associated with longer duration of surgery (308 min versus 293 min in those with no technical complications; P = 0·017), greater operative blood loss (448 versus 389 ml respectively; P = 0·035) and longer length of stay (22 versus 13 days; P < 0·001). Medical complications were associated with greater intraoperative blood loss (418 ml versus 380 ml in those with no medical complications; P = 0·013) and greater length of stay (16 versus 12 days respectively; P < 0·001). Median overall and disease-free survival were 41 and 43 months. After controlling for age, tumour stage, resection margin, length of tumour, adjuvant therapy, procedure type and co-morbidities, there was no effect of postoperative complications on disease-specific survival.
CONCLUSION: Technical and medical complications following oesophagectomy were associated with greater intraoperative blood loss and a longer duration of inpatient stay, but did not predict disease-specific survival.
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23148025     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  16 in total

1.  Cancer Recurrence After Esophagectomy: Impact of Postoperative Infection in Propensity-Matched Cohorts.

Authors:  Vernissia Tam; James D Luketich; Daniel G Winger; Inderpal S Sarkaria; Ryan M Levy; Neil A Christie; Omar Awais; Manisha R Shende; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Re: postoperative complications do not affect long-term outcome in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Philip H Pucher; Lorenzo E Ferri; Rajesh Aggarwal
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Postoperative complications do not affect long-term outcome in esophageal cancer patients: reply.

Authors:  Kirsten Lindner; Mathias Fritz; Christina Haane; Norbert Senninger; Daniel Palmes; Richard Hummel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Anastomotic leak: an early complication with potentially long-term consequences.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Daniela Molena
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Surgical outcomes of Turnbull-Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis with pull-through versus immediate coloanal anastomosis with diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  C La Raja; C Foppa; A Maroli; C Kontovounisios; N Ben David; M Carvello; A Spinelli
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.699

6.  Outcomes of esophagectomy for esophageal achalasia in the United States.

Authors:  Daniela Molena; Benedetto Mungo; Miloslawa Stem; Richard L Feinberg; Anne O Lidor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Intra-operative hypotensive episodes may be associated with post-operative esophageal anastomotic leak.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli; Alessandra Melis; Jana Balazova; Valeria Lascari; Emanuela Morenghi; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2016-05-05

8.  Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shinsuke Kanekiyo; Shigeru Takeda; Masahito Tsutsui; Mitsuo Nishiyama; Masahiro Kitahara; Yoshitaro Shindo; Yukio Tokumitsu; Shinobu Tomochika; Yoshihiro Tokuhisa; Michihisa Iida; Kazuhiko Sakamoto; Nobuaki Suzuki; Shigeru Yamamoto; Shigefumi Yoshino; Shoichi Hazama; Tomio Ueno; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Outcomes of trimodality CROSS regimen in older adults with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Cooper; Aaron R Dezube; Luis E De León; Suden Kucukak; Emanuele Mazzola; Clark Dumontier; Harvey Mamon; Peter Enzinger; Michael T Jaklitsch; Laura N Frain; Jon O Wee
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 4.037

10.  Long-Term Survival After Complications Following Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer Straatman; Miguel A Cuesta; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Donald L van der Peet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.