Literature DB >> 23147984

Neuromuscular stimulation of quadriceps in patients hospitalised during an exacerbation of COPD: a comparison of low (35 Hz) and high (50 Hz) frequencies.

Emma Jane Louise Chaplin1, Linzy Houchen, Neil J Greening, Theresa Harvey-Dunstan, Michael D Morgan, Michael C Steiner, Sally J Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has shown to improve skeletal muscle strength and exercise capacity in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Variations in NMES protocols are considerable. We aimed to compare changes in muscle strength after high-frequency and low-frequency NMES in patients admitted to hospital with an acute exacerbation of COPD.
METHODS: Patients were referred for inpatient (IP) rehabilitation during hospitalisation for an acute worsening of their COPD. They received 30-minute daily NMES to both quadriceps at a frequency of 35 or 50 Hz. NMES intensity was titrated to patients' tolerance. Isometric quadriceps muscle strength and endurance walking (ESWT) time were measured at baseline and on hospital discharge.
RESULTS: A total of 10 patients in each treatment group underwent NMES during hospitalisation (mean [SD] age 68.0 [±7.4] years, FEV1 0.99 L [±0.58], FEV1/FVC 47% [± 27%], MRC 5 [IQR ±1]). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between groups. Muscle strength (legs combined) increased in both groups regardless of the NMES frequency used (35 Hz--3.8 ± 4.9; 50 Hz--3.4 ± 5.5 kg). This was only significant within the 35 Hz group. The change in ESWT also showed a trend to increase in both groups (35 Hz--109 ± 92.7; 50 Hz--145.6 ± 94.7). There was no significant difference between groups for either outcome.
CONCLUSION: NMES is a feasible intervention to improve muscle strength in a cohort of patients admitted with an exacerbation of COPD. The response appears to be independent of the frequency used and both were well-tolerated.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; early intervention; pulmonary rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23147984     DOI: 10.1002/pri.1541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Res Int        ISSN: 1358-2267


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Sarah E Jones; Ruth E Barker; Claire M Nolan; Suhani Patel; Matthew Maddocks; William D C Man
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Muscle Impairment: Critical Review and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ethne L Nussbaum; Pamela Houghton; Joseph Anthony; Sandy Rennie; Barbara L Shay; Alison M Hoens
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 3.  Neuromuscular electrostimulation for adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Kylie Hill; Vinicius Cavalheri; Sunita Mathur; Marc Roig; Tania Janaudis-Ferreira; Priscila Robles; Thomas E Dolmage; Roger Goldstein
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-29

Review 4.  Exercise assessments and trainings of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a literature review.

Authors:  Yuqin Zeng; Fen Jiang; Yan Chen; Ping Chen; Shan Cai
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2018-06-26

Review 5.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease.

Authors:  Sarah Jones; William D-C Man; Wei Gao; Irene J Higginson; Andrew Wilcock; Matthew Maddocks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-17

Review 6.  Management of severe acute exacerbations of COPD: an updated narrative review.

Authors:  Ernesto Crisafulli; Enric Barbeta; Antonella Ielpo; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2018-10-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.