Literature DB >> 23147946

Prevention of cervical cancer in women with ASCUS in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: cost-effectiveness of the molecular biology method for HPV detection.

Rosekeila Simões Nomelini1, Patrícia Dias Neto Guimarães, Pamela Aparecida Candido, Ana Cláudia Camargo Campos, Márcia Antoniazi Michelin, Eddie Fernando Candido Murta.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the performance of PCR as a means of detecting HPV 16/18 compared to the single probe-based PCR for detecting high-risk HPV, and evaluate these methods for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in follow-ups for ASCUS testing. It also compares the costs of cytology, PCR methods, colposcopy and biopsy in the Brazilian Unified National Health System. Of the 81 patients with ASCUS, 41 (50.6%) tested positive for HPV 16/18 in PCR testing and 47 (58.02%) tested positive for high-risk HPV with single probe-based PCR testing. The negative predictive value was 93.75% for HPV 16/18 PCR and 100% for single probe-based PCR in cases that progressed to high-grade CIN. The annual costs of patient referral were the following: R$2,144.52 for referral of patients with ASCUS cytology for colposcopy; R$6,307.44 for referral of patients with ASCUS cytology and PCR positive for HPV 16/18 or colposcopy; R$3,691.80 for referral of patients with ASCUS cytology with single probe-based PCR positive for high-risk HPV. Therefore, cost per user can be reduced by performing single probe-based PCR for high-risk HPV on patients with ASCUS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23147946     DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2012001100004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cad Saude Publica        ISSN: 0102-311X            Impact factor:   1.632


  3 in total

1.  Progression Low Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion and Human Papillomavirus Infections.

Authors:  Mahira Jahic; Lejla Kameric; Azra Hadzimehmedovic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2020-06

Review 2.  Systematic Review of Health Economic Evaluations of Diagnostic Tests in Brazil: How accurate are the results?

Authors:  Maria Regina Fernandes Oliveira; Roseli Leandro; Tassia Cristina Decimoni; Luciana Martins Rozman; Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes; Patrícia Coelho De Soárez
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.365

3.  Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alessandro G Campolina; Tania Y Yuba; Tassia C Decimoni; Roseli Leandro; Maria Del Pilar Estevez Diz; Hillegonda M D Novaes; Patrícia C de Soárez
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-07-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.