OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the process of the implementation of an intervention aimed at improving work engagement and energy balance, and to explore associations between process measures and compliance. METHODS: Process measures were assessed using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: The mindfulness training was attended at least once by 81.3% of subjects, and 54.5% were highly compliant. With regard to e-coaching and homework exercises, 6.3% and 8.0%, respectively, were highly compliant. The training was appreciated with a 7.5 score and e-coaching with a 6.8 score. Appreciation of training and e-coaching, satisfaction with trainer and coach, and practical facilitation were significantly associated with compliance. CONCLUSION: The intervention was implemented well on the level of the mindfulness training, but poorly on the level of e-coaching and homework time investment. To increase compliance, attention should be paid to satisfaction and trainer-participant relationship.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the process of the implementation of an intervention aimed at improving work engagement and energy balance, and to explore associations between process measures and compliance. METHODS: Process measures were assessed using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: The mindfulness training was attended at least once by 81.3% of subjects, and 54.5% were highly compliant. With regard to e-coaching and homework exercises, 6.3% and 8.0%, respectively, were highly compliant. The training was appreciated with a 7.5 score and e-coaching with a 6.8 score. Appreciation of training and e-coaching, satisfaction with trainer and coach, and practical facilitation were significantly associated with compliance. CONCLUSION: The intervention was implemented well on the level of the mindfulness training, but poorly on the level of e-coaching and homework time investment. To increase compliance, attention should be paid to satisfaction and trainer-participant relationship.
Authors: Gerard Byron; Douglas M Ziedonis; Caroline McGrath; Jean A Frazier; Fernando deTorrijos; Carl Fulwiler Journal: Mindfulness (N Y) Date: 2014-08-08
Authors: S C Tonnon; K I Proper; H P van der Ploeg; M J Westerman; E Sijbesma; A J van der Beek Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jantien van Berkel; Cécile R L Boot; Karin I Proper; Paulien M Bongers; Allard J van der Beek Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Roosmarijn M C Schelvis; Noortje M Wiezer; Birgitte M Blatter; Joost A G M van Genabeek; Karen M Oude Hengel; Ernst T Bohlmeijer; Allard J van der Beek Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Jantien van Berkel; Cécile R L Boot; Karin I Proper; Paulien M Bongers; Allard J van der Beek Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2014-01-27 Impact factor: 6.457