Fiammetta Cosci1, Giovanni A Fava. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. fiammetta.cosci@unifi.it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The staging method, whereby a disorder is characterized according to its seriousness, extension, development and features, is attracting increasing attention in clinical psychology and psychiatry. The aim of this systematic review was to critically summarize the tools that are available for reproducing and standardizing the clinical intuitions that are involved in a staging formulation. METHODS: A comprehensive research was conducted on the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception to May 2012. The following search terms were used: 'stage/staging' AND 'psychiatric disorder/mental disorder/schizophrenia/mood disorder/anxiety disorder/substance use disorder/eating disorder'. RESULTS: A total of 78 studies were identified for inclusion in the review. We discussed studies addressing or related to the issue of staging in a number of mental disorders (schizophrenia, unipolar depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, substance use disorders, anorexia and bulimia nervosa). The literature indicates that disorders have a longitudinal development or a treatment history that can be categorized according to stages. We proposed staging formulations for the above-mentioned psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSION: Staging models offer innovative assessment tools for clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. Characterizing each stage of an illness demarcates major prognostic and therapeutic differences among patients who otherwise seem to be deceptively similar since they share the same psychiatric diagnosis. A stage 0 to denote an at-risk condition does not appear to be warranted at the current state of research.
BACKGROUND: The staging method, whereby a disorder is characterized according to its seriousness, extension, development and features, is attracting increasing attention in clinical psychology and psychiatry. The aim of this systematic review was to critically summarize the tools that are available for reproducing and standardizing the clinical intuitions that are involved in a staging formulation. METHODS: A comprehensive research was conducted on the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from inception to May 2012. The following search terms were used: 'stage/staging' AND 'psychiatric disorder/mental disorder/schizophrenia/mood disorder/anxiety disorder/substance use disorder/eating disorder'. RESULTS: A total of 78 studies were identified for inclusion in the review. We discussed studies addressing or related to the issue of staging in a number of mental disorders (schizophrenia, unipolar depression, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, substance use disorders, anorexia and bulimia nervosa). The literature indicates that disorders have a longitudinal development or a treatment history that can be categorized according to stages. We proposed staging formulations for the above-mentioned psychiatric disorders. CONCLUSION: Staging models offer innovative assessment tools for clinical psychologists and psychiatrists. Characterizing each stage of an illness demarcates major prognostic and therapeutic differences among patients who otherwise seem to be deceptively similar since they share the same psychiatric diagnosis. A stage 0 to denote an at-risk condition does not appear to be warranted at the current state of research.
Authors: Pierre Michel; Pascal Auquier; Karine Baumstarck; Anderson Loundou; Badih Ghattas; Christophe Lançon; Laurent Boyer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Giovanni A Fava; Eliana Tossani; Per Bech; Carmen Berrocal; Guy Chouinard; Claudio Csillag; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Winfried Rief Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: L Lavagnino; B Cao; B Mwangi; M-J Wu; M Sanches; G B Zunta-Soares; F Kapczinski; J Soares Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Michael Berk; Robert Post; Aswin Ratheesh; Emma Gliddon; Ajeet Singh; Eduard Vieta; Andre F Carvalho; Melanie M Ashton; Lesley Berk; Susan M Cotton; Patrick D McGorry; Brisa S Fernandes; Lakshmi N Yatham; Seetal Dodd Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Mario Maj; Dan J Stein; Gordon Parker; Mark Zimmerman; Giovanni A Fava; Marc De Hert; Koen Demyttenaere; Roger S McIntyre; Thomas Widiger; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen Journal: World Psychiatry Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 49.548
Authors: Masoud Kamali; Samantha Pegg; Jessica A Janos; William V Bobo; Benjamin Brody; Keming Gao; Terence A Ketter; Susan L McElroy; Melvin G McInnis; Dustin J Rabideau; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Richard C Shelton; Louisa G Sylvia; Mauricio Tohen; Andrew Nierenberg Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-06-02 Impact factor: 5.250