OBJECTIVES: We characterize cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid (OF) after dronabinol, synthetic oral Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and Sativex, a cannabis-extract oromucosal spray, and evaluate whether smoked cannabis relapse or Sativex compliance can be identified with OF cannabinoid monitoring. METHODS: 5 and 15 mg synthetic oral THC, low (5.4 mg THC, 5.0 mg cannabidiol (CBD)) and high (16.2 mg THC, 15.0 mg CBD) dose Sativex, and placebo were administered in random order (n=14). Oral fluid specimens were collected for 10.5 h after dosing and analyzed for THC, CBD, cannabinol (CBN), and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH). RESULTS: After oral THC, OF THC concentrations decreased over time from baseline, reflecting residual THC excretion from previously self-administered smoked cannabis. CBD and CBN also were rarely detected. After Sativex, THC, CBD and CBN increased greatly, peaking at 0.25-1 h. Median CBD/THC and CBN/THC ratios were 0.82-1.34 and 0.04-0.06, respectively, reflecting cannabinoids' composition in Sativex. THCCOOH/THC ratios within 4.5 h post Sativex were ≤ 1.6 pg/ng, always lower than after oral THC and placebo. THCCOOH/THC ratios increased throughout each dosing session. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of measurable THC, CBD and CBN in OF following oral THC, and high OF CBD/THC ratios after Sativex distinguish oral and sublingual drug delivery routes from cannabis smoking. Low THCCOOH/THC ratios suggest recent Sativex and smoked cannabis exposure. These data indicate that OF cannabinoid monitoring can document compliance with Sativex pharmacotherapy, and identify relapse to smoked cannabis during oral THC medication but not Sativex treatment, unless samples were collected shortly after smoking. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We characterize cannabinoid disposition in oral fluid (OF) after dronabinol, synthetic oral Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and Sativex, a cannabis-extract oromucosal spray, and evaluate whether smoked cannabis relapse or Sativex compliance can be identified with OF cannabinoid monitoring. METHODS: 5 and 15 mg synthetic oral THC, low (5.4 mg THC, 5.0 mg cannabidiol (CBD)) and high (16.2 mg THC, 15.0 mg CBD) dose Sativex, and placebo were administered in random order (n=14). Oral fluid specimens were collected for 10.5 h after dosing and analyzed for THC, CBD, cannabinol (CBN), and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC (THCCOOH). RESULTS: After oral THC, OF THC concentrations decreased over time from baseline, reflecting residual THC excretion from previously self-administered smoked cannabis. CBD and CBN also were rarely detected. After Sativex, THC, CBD and CBN increased greatly, peaking at 0.25-1 h. Median CBD/THC and CBN/THC ratios were 0.82-1.34 and 0.04-0.06, respectively, reflecting cannabinoids' composition in Sativex. THCCOOH/THC ratios within 4.5 h post Sativex were ≤ 1.6 pg/ng, always lower than after oral THC and placebo. THCCOOH/THC ratios increased throughout each dosing session. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of measurable THC, CBD and CBN in OF following oral THC, and high OF CBD/THC ratios after Sativex distinguish oral and sublingual drug delivery routes from cannabis smoking. Low THCCOOH/THC ratios suggest recent Sativex and smoked cannabis exposure. These data indicate that OF cannabinoid monitoring can document compliance with Sativex pharmacotherapy, and identify relapse to smoked cannabis during oral THC medication but not Sativex treatment, unless samples were collected shortly after smoking. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Gerold F Kauert; Johannes G Ramaekers; Erhard Schneider; Manfred R Moeller; Stefan W Toennes Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Ross H Lowe; Tsadik T Abraham; William D Darwin; Ronald Herning; Jean Lud Cadet; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Theresa H M Moore; Stanley Zammit; Anne Lingford-Hughes; Thomas R E Barnes; Peter B Jones; Margaret Burke; Glyn Lewis Journal: Lancet Date: 2007-07-28 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David M Schwope; Wendy M Bosker; Johannes G Ramaekers; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Ryan Vandrey; Evan S Herrmann; John M Mitchell; George E Bigelow; Ronald Flegel; Charles LoDico; Edward J Cone Journal: J Anal Toxicol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Jose M Trigo; Dina Lagzdins; Jürgen Rehm; Peter Selby; Islam Gamaleddin; Benedikt Fischer; Allan J Barnes; Marilyn A Huestis; Bernard Le Foll Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Dayong Lee; Ryan Vandrey; Garry Milman; Mateus Bergamaschi; Damodara R Mendu; Jeannie A Murray; Allan J Barnes; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2013-07-06 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Sebastien Anizan; Garry Milman; Nathalie Desrosiers; Allan J Barnes; David A Gorelick; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2013-08-17 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Danielle McCartney; Richard C Kevin; Anastasia S Suraev; Christopher Irwin; Ronald R Grunstein; Camilla M Hoyos; Iain S McGregor Journal: Drug Test Anal Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Karl B Scheidweiler; Sarah K Himes; Xiaohong Chen; Hua-Fen Liu; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Dayong Lee; Ryan Vandrey; Damodara R Mendu; Sebastien Anizan; Garry Milman; Jeannie A Murray; Allan J Barnes; Marilyn A Huestis Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2013-08-12 Impact factor: 8.327