OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a telephone-delivered, spouse-assisted lifestyle intervention to reduce patient LDL-C. METHOD: From 2007 to 2010, 255 outpatients with LDL-C>76 mg/dL and their spouses from the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center were randomized to intervention or usual care. The intervention comprised nine monthly goal-setting telephone calls to patients and support planning calls to spouses. Outcomes were assessed at 11 months. RESULTS:Patients were 95% male and 65% White. LDL-C did not differ between groups (mean difference = 2.3 mg/dL, 95% CI = -3.6, 8.3, p = 0.44), nor did the odds of meeting goal LDL-C (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.6, 1.7; p = 0.87). Intakes of calories (p = 0.03), total fat (p = 0.02), and saturated fat (p = 0.02) were lower for the intervention group. Cholesterol and fiber intake did not differ between groups (p = 0.11 and 0.26, respectively). The estimated rate of moderate intensity physical activity per week was 20% higher in the intervention group (IRR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0, 1.5, p = 0.06). Most participants did not experience a change in cholesterol medication usage during the study period in the intervention (71.7%) and usual care (78.9%) groups. CONCLUSION: This intervention might be an adjunct to usual primary care to improve adherence to lifestyle behaviors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of a telephone-delivered, spouse-assisted lifestyle intervention to reduce patientLDL-C. METHOD: From 2007 to 2010, 255 outpatients with LDL-C>76 mg/dL and their spouses from the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center were randomized to intervention or usual care. The intervention comprised nine monthly goal-setting telephone calls to patients and support planning calls to spouses. Outcomes were assessed at 11 months. RESULTS:Patients were 95% male and 65% White. LDL-C did not differ between groups (mean difference = 2.3 mg/dL, 95% CI = -3.6, 8.3, p = 0.44), nor did the odds of meeting goal LDL-C (OR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.6, 1.7; p = 0.87). Intakes of calories (p = 0.03), total fat (p = 0.02), and saturated fat (p = 0.02) were lower for the intervention group. Cholesterol and fiber intake did not differ between groups (p = 0.11 and 0.26, respectively). The estimated rate of moderate intensity physical activity per week was 20% higher in the intervention group (IRR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.0, 1.5, p = 0.06). Most participants did not experience a change in cholesterol medication usage during the study period in the intervention (71.7%) and usual care (78.9%) groups. CONCLUSION: This intervention might be an adjunct to usual primary care to improve adherence to lifestyle behaviors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Corrine I Voils; Rachel Adler; Elizabeth Strawbridge; Janet Grubber; Kelli D Allen; Maren K Olsen; Megan A McVay; Sridharan Raghavan; Susan D Raffa; Luke M Funk Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2020-01-30 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Sridharan Raghavan; Mark C Pachucki; Yuchiao Chang; Bianca Porneala; Caroline S Fox; Josée Dupuis; James B Meigs Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Stephanie Anna Lenzen; Ramon Daniëls; Marloes Amantia van Bokhoven; Trudy van der Weijden; Anna Beurskens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Karen M Goldstein; Leah L Zullig; Eugene Z Oddone; Sara M Andrews; Mary E Grewe; Susanne Danus; Michele Heisler; Lori A Bastian; Corrine I Voils Journal: Prev Med Rep Date: 2018-04-24