Literature DB >> 23146579

Is publication rate an equal opportunity metric?

Elissa Z Cameron1, Meeghan E Gray, Angela M White.   

Abstract

Publication quantity is frequently used as a ranking metric for employment, promotion, and grant success, and is considered an unbiased metric for comparing applicants. However, research suggests that women publish fewer papers, such that the measure may not be equitable. We suggest reasons for the disparity, and potential future remedies. Publication quality and impact provide more equitable metrics of research performance and should be stressed above publication quantity.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23146579     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  5 in total

1.  Publishing: Halt self-citation in impact measures.

Authors:  Elissa Z Cameron; Amy M Edwards; Angela M White
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Underrepresentation of women in the senior levels of Brazilian science.

Authors:  Jaroslava V Valentova; Emma Otta; Maria Luisa Silva; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  The peer review gap: A longitudinal case study of gendered publishing and occupational patterns in a female-rich discipline, Western North America (1974-2016).

Authors:  Shannon Tushingham; Tiffany Fulkerson; Katheryn Hill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM.

Authors:  Nyssa J Silbiger; Amber D Stubler
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Where are the female science professors? A personal perspective.

Authors:  Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-06-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.