Literature DB >> 23146450

Monitoring of circulating antibodies in a renal transplantation population: preliminary results.

M L Rodríguez Ferrero1, D Arroyo, N Panizo, J L Vicario, A Balas, F Anaya.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The presence of circulating antibodies (CA) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and major-histocompatibility-complex class I-related chain A (MICA) antigens has been associated with worse renal function and reduced kidney allograft survival. We sought to describe the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies, non-donor specific antibodies, and antibodies against MICA antigens among a cohort of renal transplant recipients with respect to their evolution effects on renal function and occurrence of an acute rejection episode (AR) after transplantation.
METHODS: This prospective study of 22 renal transplant recipients of deceased donor kidneys underwent studies of antibodies before and 3 months after grafting using Luminex technology.
RESULTS: Ten patients (five men and five women) showed preexistent CA. Comparing patients with versus without preformed CA, we did not observe a significant difference in donor and recipient age or gender. Eight patients (80%) with CA had undergone induction treatment with anti-human-activated T-lymphocyte rabbit immunoglobulin and 2 (20%) with basiliximab. There were no differences between groups regarding the incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE n = 3 each). There was one case of Banff grade IIB ARE in a patient without preexisting CA; the other episodes were low-grade cellular responses. There were no differences in other variables including cold ischemia time, HLA mismatches, panel-reactive antibody levels, number of transfusions, cytomegalovirus infection or renal function at discharge and 3 months later. Retransplantation was the only factor associated with preformed CA. Retransplantation and preformed CA were associated with CA at 3 months after transplantation.
CONCLUSIONS: CA monitoring is important for highly sensitized renal transplants, although our experience failed to show a difference in graft survival or renal function in the first 3 months' follow-up.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23146450     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  2 in total

Review 1.  Immunosenescence in renal transplantation: a changing balance of innate and adaptive immunity.

Authors:  Midas Seyda; Markus Quante; Hirofumi Uehara; Bendix R Slegtenhorst; Abdala Elkhal; Stefan G Tullius
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.640

Review 2.  MICA and NKG2D: Is There an Impact on Kidney Transplant Outcome?

Authors:  Matilde Risti; Maria da Graça Bicalho
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 7.561

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.