Literature DB >> 23146246

The vasopressin V(1b) receptor antagonist SSR149415 in the treatment of major depressive and generalized anxiety disorders: results from 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Guy Griebel1, Sandra Beeské, Stephen M Stahl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: These studies were designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of the first nonpeptide vasopressin V(1b) receptor antagonist, SSR149415, in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD).
METHOD: Studies were randomized 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating 100- and 250-mg twice daily doses of SSR149415, placebo, and escitalopram 10 mg/day or paroxetine 20 mg/day, conducted from August 2006 through February 2008. Participants met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision criteria for MDD or GAD. Baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) total scores were ≥ 24 and 18, respectively, and in the GAD trial baseline Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) score was ≥ 22. Primary efficacy variables included changes from baseline in total score on HDRS or HARS and MADRS, and the secondary variable included changes in the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness score (CGI-S). A 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of 100- and 250-mg twice daily doses of SSR149415 on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in MDD patients was also conducted.
RESULTS: In the GAD trial, SSR149415 did not separate from placebo on the primary (HARS-100 mg: P = .29; 250 mg: P = .21) and secondary (CGI-S-100 mg: P = .18; 250 mg: P = .24) outcome measures, while paroxetine demonstrated efficacy (HARS: P = .003; CGI-S: P = .01). In 2 MDD trials, SSR149415-treated patients did not show significant improvement from baseline on any outcome measure compared with placebo-treated patients (HDRS-100 mg: P = .21 and .48, respectively; 250 mg: P = .22 and P = .46, respectively; CGI-S-100 mg: P = .64 and P = .82, respectively; 250 mg: P = .33 and P = .08, respectively). In the third MDD study, SSR149415 250 mg (P = .04), but not escitalopram (P = .15), demonstrated significant improvement compared to placebo on the HDRS total score at week 8. SSR149415 had no deleterious effects on the HPA axis.
CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that SSR149415 may not be useful for the treatment of GAD and that its antidepressant potential needs to be further evaluated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00374166 (Sanofi ID number: DFI5880), NCT00361491 (Sanofi ID number: DFI5879), NCT00358631 (Sanofi ID number: DFI5878), NCT01606384 (Sanofi ID number: PDY5467). © Copyright 2012 Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23146246     DOI: 10.4088/JCP.12m07804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 0160-6689            Impact factor:   4.384


  20 in total

Review 1.  Vasopressin and alcohol: a multifaceted relationship.

Authors:  Kathryn M Harper; Darin J Knapp; Hugh E Criswell; George R Breese
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Antidepressant and anxiolytic profiles of newly synthesized arginine vasopressin V1B receptor antagonists: TASP0233278 and TASP0390325.

Authors:  M Iijima; T Yoshimizu; T Shimazaki; K Tokugawa; K Fukumoto; S Kurosu; T Kuwada; Y Sekiguchi; S Chaki
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Clinical safety and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis effects of the arginine vasopressin type 1B receptor antagonist ABT-436.

Authors:  David A Katz; Wei Liu; Charles Locke; Sandeep Dutta; Katherine A Tracy
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Sex differences in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: An obstacle to antidepressant drug development?

Authors:  Nikolaos Kokras; Georgia E Hodes; Debra A Bangasser; Christina Dalla
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  The interaction of escitalopram and R-citalopram at the human serotonin transporter investigated in the mouse.

Authors:  Jacob P R Jacobsen; Per Plenge; Benjamin D Sachs; Alan L Pehrson; Manuel Cajina; Yunzhi Du; Wendy Roberts; Meghan L Rudder; Prachiti Dalvi; Taylor J Robinson; Sharon P O'Neill; King S Khoo; Connie Sanchez Morillo; Xiaodong Zhang; Marc G Caron
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Innovative drugs to treat depression: did animal models fail to be predictive or did clinical trials fail to detect effects?

Authors:  Catherine Belzung
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 7.  The neurobiological correlates of childhood adversity and implications for treatment.

Authors:  A R Tyrka; D E Burgers; N S Philip; L H Price; L L Carpenter
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 6.392

8.  Amygdala Arginine Vasopressin Modulates Chronic Ethanol Withdrawal Anxiety-Like Behavior in the Social Interaction Task.

Authors:  Kathryn M Harper; Darin J Knapp; Ryan K Butler; Cory A Cook; Hugh E Criswell; Garret D Stuber; George R Breese
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 9.  Advances in novel molecular targets for antidepressants.

Authors:  Qingzhong Wang; Yogesh Dwivedi
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 10.  New agents and perspectives in the pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Marsal Sanches; Joao Quevedo; Jair C Soares
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 5.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.