Literature DB >> 23146092

Albedo impact on the suitability of biochar systems to mitigate global warming.

Sebastian Meyer1, Ryan M Bright, Daniel Fischer, Hardy Schulz, Bruno Glaser.   

Abstract

Biochar application to agricultural soils can change the surface albedo which could counteract the climate mitigation benefit of biochar systems. However, the size of this impact has not yet been quantified. Based on empirical albedo measurements and literature data of arable soils mixed with biochar, a model for annual vegetation cover development based on satellite data and an assessment of the annual development of surface humidity, an average mean annual albedo reduction of 0.05 has been calculated for applying 30-32 Mg ha(-1) biochar on a test field near Bayreuth, Germany. The impact of biochar production and application on the carbon cycle and on the soil albedo was integrated into the greenhouse gas (GHG) balance of a modeled pyrolysis based biochar system via the computation of global warming potential (GWP) characterization factors. The analysis resulted in a reduction of the overall climate mitigation benefit of biochar systems by 13-22% due to the albedo change as compared to an analysis which disregards the albedo effect. Comparing the use of the same quantity of biomass in a biochar system to a bioenergy district heating system which replaces natural gas combustion, bioenergy heating systems achieve 99-119% of the climate benefit of biochar systems according to the model calculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23146092     DOI: 10.1021/es302302g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Biochar: Pros must outweigh cons.

Authors:  Hong Yang; Xianjin Huang; Julian R Thompson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Sensitive responders among bacterial and fungal microbiome to pyrogenic organic matter (biochar) addition differed greatly between rhizosphere and bulk soils.

Authors:  Zhongmin Dai; Jiajie Hu; Xingkun Xu; Lujun Zhang; Philip C Brookes; Yan He; Jianming Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Characterising the biophysical, economic and social impacts of soil carbon sequestration as a greenhouse gas removal technology.

Authors:  Alasdair J Sykes; Michael Macleod; Vera Eory; Robert M Rees; Florian Payen; Vasilis Myrgiotis; Mathew Williams; Saran Sohi; Jon Hillier; Dominic Moran; David A C Manning; Pietro Goglio; Michele Seghetta; Adrian Williams; Jim Harris; Marta Dondini; Jack Walton; Joanna House; Pete Smith
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 10.863

4.  Phosphorus-assisted biomass thermal conversion: reducing carbon loss and improving biochar stability.

Authors:  Ling Zhao; Xinde Cao; Wei Zheng; Yue Kan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.