In this Letter we present the electrical and electro-optical characterization of single crystalline germanium nanowires (NWs) under tensile strain conditions. The measurements were performed on vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) grown germanium (Ge) NWs, monolithically integrated into a micromechanical 3-point strain module. Uniaxial stress is applied along the ⟨111⟩ growth direction of individual, 100 nm thick Ge NWs while at the same time performing electrical and optical characterization at room temperature. Compared to bulk germanium, an anomalously high and negative-signed piezoresistive coefficient has been found. Spectrally resolved photocurrent characterization on strained NWs gives experimental evidence on the strain-induced modifications of the band structure. Particularly we are revealing a rapid decrease in resistivity and a red-shift in photocurrent spectra under high strain conditions. For a tensile strain of 1.8%, resistivity decreased by a factor of 30, and the photocurrent spectra shifted by 88 meV. Individual stressed NWs are recognized as an ideal platform for the exploration of strain-related electronic and optical effects and may contribute significantly to the realization of novel optoelectronic devices, strain-enhanced field-effect transistors (FETs), or highly sensitive strain gauges.
In this Letter we present the electrical and electro-optical characterization of single crystalline germanium nanowires (NWs) under tensile strain conditions. The measurements were performed on vapor-liquid-solid (VLS) grown germanium (Ge) NWs, monolithically integrated into a micromechanical 3-point strain module. Uniaxial stress is applied along the ⟨111⟩ growth direction of individual, 100 nm thick Ge NWs while at the same time performing electrical and optical characterization at room temperature. Compared to bulk germanium, an anomalously high and negative-signed piezoresistive coefficient has been found. Spectrally resolved photocurrent characterization on strained NWs gives experimental evidence on the strain-induced modifications of the band structure. Particularly we are revealing a rapid decrease in resistivity and a red-shift in photocurrent spectra under high strain conditions. For a tensile strain of 1.8%, resistivity decreased by a factor of 30, and the photocurrent spectra shifted by 88 meV. Individual stressed NWs are recognized as an ideal platform for the exploration of strain-related electronic and optical effects and may contribute significantly to the realization of novel optoelectronic devices, strain-enhanced field-effect transistors (FETs), or highly sensitive strain gauges.
Due to the high mobility values,
particularly for holes, and the compatibility with complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor
(CMOS) processing, Ge has been introduced into standard Si technology
since years.[1] In addition, due to the small
difference between direct and indirect bandgap energy, Ge appeared
to be a promising material for next generation on-chip light sources
and detectors[2,3] and thus triggered a lot of activities
for photonic applications.[4−11] Thereby the main issue is to overcome the inefficient light emission
of an indirect semiconductor. There have been several attempts to
minimize the 136 meV gap between the direct Γ- and the indirect
L-valley, including band structure modifications by quantum confinement,
alloying, or strain engineering, also in combination with heavy doping.
A direct band gap can be obtained by zone folding and quantum confinement
by growth of alternating layers of Si/Ge. Zone-folding transitions
do, however, typically show weak transition strength.[12] Interalloying and strain effects are further challenges
in those superlattices.[13] Another approach,
alloying Ge with Sn, indeed yields a direct band gap material,[14] but growth appeared to be a crucial issue due
to the low solubility of Sn in Ge.[15] Under
biaxial tensile strain conditions the conduction band lowers in energy
whereby the Γ-valley lowers faster than the L-valley, and thus
for strain values of about 2%[16] Ge transforms
to a direct bandgap semiconductor.[17,18] With respect
to biaxially strained layers, epitaxial growth requires host materials
with a proper lattice constant, thermal expansion coefficient, and
polarity. To the best of our knowledge, using sophisticated growth
schemes, Huo et al. were the only ones exceeding the 2% strain hurdle
for direct bandgap properties growing 2.33% tensile strained Ge layers
on InGaAs buffer layers.[11] Contrary to
theoretical predictions they found a rather small change in the direct
band gap energy, nevertheless shifting the transition out of the favorable
telecom band around 1550 nm. Synthesis, however, remains the major
challenge in Ge thin film growth, as thermal expansion and lattice
mismatch cause a high density of interface and threading dislocations,
as well as increased surface roughness.[19] To circumvent the problem of growing such heavily strained layers
and to keep the emission wavelength within the telecom band Liu et
al. proposed a combination of moderate strain and n-type doping to
enhance direct recombination in Ge.[16] In-plane
strain is utilized to lower the difference in energy between Γ-
and L-valley. Additionally the doping raises the Fermi level closer
to the Γ-valley and thus increases the carrier population. High
doping, however, causes enhanced free carrier absorption.The
ability to fabricate single-crystal nanowires (NWs) that are
widely free of structural defects can be employed to apply sufficiently
high strain levels without the need of additional doping. In Ge-NWs,
uniaxial tensile strain values of more than 10% have already been
demonstrated without fatigue failure.[20] Due to the low defect density along the NW, ultimate strength overcomes
the theoretical limit for bulk Ge of 15 GPa. Simulation results, quantifying
the amount of uniaxial strain for the indirect-to-direct transition
in Ge-NWs, vary over a wide range from 1.05%[21] up to 4.2%.[9] This is, however, well below
the demonstrated 10% fracture strength. The high strain values feasible
in Ge-NWs together with the large Bohr exciton radius (24.3 nm) and
carrier confinement in these quasi-one-dimensional structures make
them an ideal platform for the exploration of strain-related one-dimensional
light-matter interaction effects.[6]Based on individual NWs monolithically integrated in a sophisticated
micromechanical strain module, we explored a technique to characterize
ultra-strained NWs by μ-Raman spectroscopy, conductance, and
spectrally resolved photocurrent measurements. Figure 1a shows a sketch of the 3-point straining module with an individual
Ge-NW bridging the Si pads of a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) device
structure. As the two Si pads are electrically insulated with respect
to the handle wafer this module enables I/V measurement of an individual Ge-NW under various strain
conditions. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image in Figure 2a shows the detailed view of a ⟨111⟩-oriented
Ge-NW bridging the two insulated Si pads. These pads were structured
from the highly p-doped (110)-oriented device layer of an SOI wafer
by photolithography and reactive ion etching. Gold colloids were placed
on the ⟨111⟩-oriented sidewall facet by dielectrophoresis
to act as catalyst for vapor–liquid–solid (VLS) based
NW growth. Synthesis parameters were optimized to grow epitaxial,
⟨111⟩-oriented Ge-NWs perpendicular to the {111} surface
of the freestanding Si pads. Further information on the synthesis
process is available in the Supporting Information. The TEM images in Figure 2b and c demonstrate
the epitaxial growth and the sharp interface at the Si/Ge heterojunction.
The length of the NW is determined by the distance between prepatterned
Si pads, which is typically 3.5 μm. Finally, the SOI chip is
aligned and glued firmly onto a steel plate, and electrical contacts
are formed by aluminum wire bonding to the corresponding pads as shown
in Figure 1a.
Figure 1
(a) Sketch of the 3-point straining module
for electro-optical
characterization of suspended single nanowires. (b) I/V characteristics of a Ge NW indicating space charge
limited transport and increased conductivity under strain.
Figure 2
⟨111⟩-oriented Ge-NW bridge. (a) SEM image
of the
suspended Ge-NW aligned along the ⟨111⟩ direction, within
a trench with vertical {111} facets on a ⟨110⟩-oriented
SOI substrate. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of a Ge NW with amorphous
Ge shell on (111) Si substrate. To improve imaging quality, a layer
of carbon and platinum was deposited on the sample. (c) HR-TEM image
confirming heteroepitaxial growth of the Ge-NW on Si.
(a) Sketch of the 3-point straining module
for electro-optical
characterization of suspended single nanowires. (b) I/V characteristics of a Ge NW indicating space charge
limited transport and increased conductivity under strain.⟨111⟩-oriented Ge-NW bridge. (a) SEM image
of the
suspended Ge-NW aligned along the ⟨111⟩ direction, within
a trench with vertical {111} facets on a ⟨110⟩-oriented
SOI substrate. (b) Cross-sectional TEM image of a Ge NW with amorphous
Ge shell on (111) Si substrate. To improve imaging quality, a layer
of carbon and platinum was deposited on the sample. (c) HR-TEM image
confirming heteroepitaxial growth of the Ge-NW on Si.Thus, when the steel substrate is subject to 3-point
bending, mainly
uniaxial tensile stress is created along the NW. Stresses other than
in the axial direction cannot be imposed because the NW is anchored
only with its two ends at the SOI facets. Figure 1b shows typical I/V plots
of a strained and unstrained Ge-NW. The S-shaped I/V characteristic indicates space charge limited
transport[22] with the current mainly governed
by the mobility of charge carriers in the intrinsic NW.[23] Increasing conductivity for increasing strain
is observed. For the determination of stress we are employing confocal
μ-Raman microscopy enabling in situ high spatial resolution
measurements of individual strained NWs.[24] Figure 3 shows the Raman spectrum of the
reference bulk Ge sample and of an individual Ge-NW subject to increasing
strain. Bulk Ge and unstrained NWs exhibit the first-order optical
phonon peak at 300.5 cm–1.
Figure 3
Normalized Raman spectra
of one single suspended Ge NW subject
to increasing strain. Under zero strain conditions the spectrum equals
the one for bulk Ge. For increasing tensile strain, the spectrum shifts
toward lower wavenumbers, down to 290 cm–1, corresponding
to 2.5% tensile strain. The inset shows the Raman peak positions and
strain values for each of the spectra.
Normalized Raman spectra
of one single suspended Ge NW subject
to increasing strain. Under zero strain conditions the spectrum equals
the one for bulk Ge. For increasing tensile strain, the spectrum shifts
toward lower wavenumbers, down to 290 cm–1, corresponding
to 2.5% tensile strain. The inset shows the Raman peak positions and
strain values for each of the spectra.An application of stress to the Ge-NW causes a
shift linearly dependent
on the strain as shown in the inset of Figure 3. The relation of the shift in the Raman spectra and uniaxial strain
is given by:With ΔΩ representing the shift
in peak position, k a proportionality factor, and
ε∥ the strain in ⟨111⟩ direction.
We performed calibration measurements comparing Raman peak shifts
with a physical length change of the NW. The length and elongation
of the Ge-NW under stress was determined in situ by SEM imaging, measuring
the distance between the two ends of the NW. The epitaxial growth
of the Ge-NWs perpendicular to the Si pads (i.e., to the direction
of the electron beam) enables a precise measurement of the NW elongation
with approximately 10 nm precision without any “hidden”
displacement along the electron beam direction. Our calibration measurements
reveal k = 434 cm–1 and are in
good agreement with bulk Ge values from Cerdeira et al. of k = 438 cm–1.[25] The above equation is further used to quantify the strain level
of the Ge-NWs immediately before the electo-optical characterization.
Thus a peak shift of about 11 cm–1 as shown for
the highest strain level in Figure 3 corresponds
to a tensile strain of about 2.5%. For the electrical characterization
the two electrodes of the measurement module in Figure 1a were connected to a semiconductor analyzer, and the current
was measured during continuous voltage sweeps applied to the Ge-NW
at different strain levels. Doing so, the local NW resistance is measured
in a two point configuration with the disadvantage of the parasitic
effect of the contact resistance. However, for the heavily doped electrode
regions the contribution of the resistance between the electrodes
and the NW was found to be negligible. Four-probe measurements of
such grown Ge-NWs revealed an intrinsic resistivity of ρNW = 1–10 kΩ·cm. The conductivity-type of
the Ge-NW was determined by a NW field-effect transistor (FET) with
back gate geometry exhibiting a field effect response characteristic
of a p-type semiconductor (see Supporting Information). This p-type behavior is a common observation for VLS-grown Ge-NWs
without intentional doping.[26] The inset
in Figure 4 illustrates typical I/V characteristics of an unstrained Ge-NW and for
strain levels of 0.9% and 1.8%. From the I/Vs the
striking impact of strain on NW conductivity can be observed. While
the shape of the characteristic is similar for all strain levels,
the current increases over more than 1 order of magnitude for 1.8%
strain. Modification of the lattice constant and crystalline structure
by stress strongly affects the band structure, carrier concentration,
and carrier transport properties.[27] One
manifestation of these altered properties of the crystal is piezoresistivity,
that is, the dependency of resistivity ϱ on the stress σ
within a material:with π1 the longitudinal
piezoresistive coefficient.
Figure 4
Relative change in resistivity as a function
of strain. Values
are extracted at bias voltages of 1 V. The data can be fitted exponentially
with a piezoresistive coefficient of −249 × 10–11 Pa–1 extracted as the slope of the fit at zero
strain. Inset: Typical I/(V s) under
increasing strain conditions.
Relative change in resistivity as a function
of strain. Values
are extracted at bias voltages of 1 V. The data can be fitted exponentially
with a piezoresistive coefficient of −249 × 10–11 Pa–1 extracted as the slope of the fit at zero
strain. Inset: Typical I/(V s) under
increasing strain conditions.For p-type bulk Ge the piezoresistive coefficient
in ⟨111⟩
direction was determined to be about π1 = 65 ×
10–11 Pa–1 leading to an increase
of the resistivity for tensile strained Ge.[27] Contrary, for our heavily strained Ge-NWs we measured a remarkable
decrease of the resistivity. Similar behavior was previously reported
for highly strained ⟨111⟩ oriented Si-NWs.[23] The work of He and Yang[28] gave experimental evidence on a positive giant piezoresitance effect
(PZR) in Si-NWs at lower strain levels of up to 0.04%. Their findings
stimulated a lot of further theoretical and experimental research
effort on piezoresistive effects in nanostructures.[29−37] Although several studies have been published, there seems to be
no consensus on the origins of giant PZR. Cao et al.[29] proposed a strain-induced band switching between two surface
states to be the main mechanism involved. Rowe[30] explained giant PZR with a strain-induced increase in the
width of the surface depletion region due to changes in surface charge.
He and Yang[28] claimed that carrier mobility
is the main mechanism but also emphasized the important contribution
of surface effects and carrier concentration on giant PZR. Quantum
confinement as proposed by Pramanik et al.[31] seems to be an unlikely explanation due to the size of the structures
well above 50 nm. Milne et al.[32] noted
that giant PZR was only reported for depleted structures and therein
resistance changes are dominated by transient electron and hole capture
processes in surface traps. They showed that the trap-induced decay
of current with time can be mistaken for an apparent giant PZR. Our
data from time-dependent measurements, however, indicate only noisy
fluctuations of current on a typical measurement time scale but no
systematic deviation (see Supporting Information). In Figure 4 the relative change in resistivity
is plotted as a function of strain and shows the monotonic decrease
in resistivity with an exponential decay. Resistivity values are extracted
at 1 V bias from different single Ge-NW devices. Dimensional changes
in the NW are neglected due to their small contribution. The equation
for the relative change in resistivity Δϱ/ϱ for
a cylindrically shaped piezoresistive element is given bywith ν the Poisson's ratio and ε∥ the strain along the cylinder axis.Figure 4 shows that at 0.65% strain resistivity
is decreased by −90% and further decreases to −97% at
the maximum value of 2.1% strain. A linear fit of the exponential
decay in Figure 4 at the zero strain point
yields a piezoresistive coefficient of π1 = −249
× 10–11 Pa–1 (assuming a
Young's modulus of Ge along ⟨111⟩ of 155 GPa). As the
discussion on the underlying mechanisms of anomalous piezoresistive
effects in nanostructures is still going on, we are contributing first
experimental data for Ge-NWs and emphasize on the importance of further
studies to reveal the physics involved.To probe the band modifications
induced by strain more directly,
photocurrent spectroscopy was used to determine the effects on bandgap
energy. The inset in Figure 5 shows photocurrent
spectra of a single suspended Ge-NW under increasing strain conditions.
Thereby the photocurrent is given in terms of external quantum efficiency
(EQE). EQE is defined as the ratio of photocurrent to the incident
photon flux on the projected NW area.In the spectrum we observe characteristic
ripples, which are attributed to the specific layer structure in the
SOI device (see Supporting Information).
Under tensile strain, we observed a redshift in the photocurrent spectrum;
that is, for increasing strain the onset of photocurrent is shifted
toward higher wavelengths. The corresponding shift in energy for several
devices is displayed in Figure 5 and appeared
to be linearly dependent on strainwith the proportionality factor a∥ = −5.0 eV. Comparison to deformation potential
theory for the direct bandgap in bulk germanium[38] gives reasonable agreement, though our result is ∼23%
lower than a∥dir = −6.48 eV calculated from theory
for bulk material. Interpreting the shift in photocurrent spectra
as a shift in direct bandgap energy, this means that the direct bandgap
in the NW geometry is lowering slower with strain than assumed by
theory and will be an important input parameter for future device
designs as well as simulations.
Figure 5
Shift in the Ge-NW photocurrent spectra
as a function of uniaxial
strain along the ⟨111⟩ growth direction. Values are
extracted from quantum efficiency spectra of several devices. The
data are linearly fitted with a slope of a∥ = −5.0 eV. Inset: Quantum efficiency spectra of a single
suspended Ge-NW monolithically integrated in the straining device.
Spectra are normalized to their maximum to highlight the change in
shape. With increasing strain the onset of photocurrent shifts toward
the red, indicating a lowering of the direct-bandgap energy.
Shift in the Ge-NW photocurrent spectra
as a function of uniaxial
strain along the ⟨111⟩ growth direction. Values are
extracted from quantum efficiency spectra of several devices. The
data are linearly fitted with a slope of a∥ = −5.0 eV. Inset: Quantum efficiency spectra of a single
suspended Ge-NW monolithically integrated in the straining device.
Spectra are normalized to their maximum to highlight the change in
shape. With increasing strain the onset of photocurrent shifts toward
the red, indicating a lowering of the direct-bandgap energy.Summarizing we have shown Raman, electrical, and
optical characterization
of strained Ge-NWs, revealing anomalous piezoresistive behavior, that
is, a nonconstant negative piezoresistive coefficient with resistivity
change being exponentially dependent on strain. Furthermore we deliver
experimental data on the dependency of the shift in photocurrent spectra
on uniaxial strain in the ⟨111⟩ direction. The extraordinary
piezoresistive behavior of Ge-NWs could find applications in micorelectromechanical
systems (MEMS) devices, strain-sensing, and high-performance CMOS
devices. Our findings on the electro-optical tunability of strained
Ge-NWs may contribute to a better understanding of strain induced
effects in nanostructures and pave the way toward novel optoelectronic
devices.
Authors: Lien T Ngo; Dorothée Almécija; John E Sader; Brian Daly; Nikolay Petkov; Justin D Holmes; Donats Erts; John J Boland Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Linyou Cao; Justin S White; Joon-Shik Park; Jon A Schuller; Bruce M Clemens; Mark L Brongersma Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2009-07-05 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: M de Kersauson; M El Kurdi; S David; X Checoury; G Fishman; S Sauvage; R Jakomin; G Beaudoin; I Sagnes; P Boucaud Journal: Opt Express Date: 2011-09-12 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Maximilian Zapf; Robert Röder; Karl Winkler; Lisa Kaden; Johannes Greil; Marcel Wille; Marius Grundmann; Rüdiger Schmidt-Grund; Alois Lugstein; Carsten Ronning Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2017-10-23 Impact factor: 11.189