Literature DB >> 23145888

Diet and phylogeny shape the gut microbiota of Antarctic seals: a comparison of wild and captive animals.

Tiffanie M Nelson1, Tracey L Rogers, Alejandro R Carlini, Mark V Brown.   

Abstract

The gut microbiota of mammals underpins the metabolic capacity and health of the host. Our understanding of what influences the composition of this community has been limited primarily to evidence from captive and terrestrial mammals. Therefore, the gut microbiota of southern elephant seals, Mirounga leonina, and leopard seals, Hydrurga leptonyx, inhabiting Antarctica were compared with captive leopard seals. Each seal exhibited a gut microbiota dominated by four phyla: Firmicutes (41.5 ± 4.0%), Fusobacteria (25.6 ± 3.9%), Proteobacteria (17.0 ± 3.2%) and Bacteroidetes (14.1 ± 1.7%). Species, age, sex and captivity were strong drivers of the composition of the gut microbiota, which can be attributed to differences in diet, gut length and physiology and social interactions. Differences in particular prey items consumed by seal species could contribute to the observed differences in the gut microbiota. The longer gut of the southern elephant seal provides a habitat reduced in available oxygen and more suitable to members of the phyla Bacteroidetes compared with other hosts. Among wild seals, 16 'core' bacterial community members were present in the gut of at least 50% of individuals. As identified between southern elephant seal mother-pup pairs, 'core' members are passed on via vertical transmission from a young age and persist through to adulthood. Our study suggests that these hosts have co-evolved with their gut microbiota and core members may provide some benefit to the host, such as developing the immune system. Further evidence of their strong evolutionary history is provided with the presence of 18 shared 'core' members in the gut microbiota of related seals living in the Arctic. The influence of diet and other factors, particularly in captivity, influences the composition of the community considerably. This study suggests that the gut microbiota has co-evolved with wild mammals as is evident in the shared presence of 'core' members.
© 2012 Society for Applied Microbiology and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145888     DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.12022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  77 in total

1.  Individual and Site-Specific Variation in a Biogeographical Profile of the Coyote Gastrointestinal Microbiota.

Authors:  Scott Sugden; Colleen Cassady St Clair; Lisa Y Stein
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 2.  Network analysis of gut microbiota literature: an overview of the research landscape in non-human animal studies.

Authors:  Emily L Pascoe; Heidi C Hauffe; Julian R Marchesi; Sarah E Perkins
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 10.302

3.  Diet Versus Phylogeny: a Comparison of Gut Microbiota in Captive Colobine Monkey Species.

Authors:  Vanessa L Hale; Chia L Tan; Kefeng Niu; Yeqin Yang; Rob Knight; Qikun Zhang; Duoying Cui; Katherine R Amato
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Patterns in Gut Microbiota Similarity Associated with Degree of Sociality among Sex Classes of a Neotropical Primate.

Authors:  Katherine R Amato; Sarie Van Belle; Anthony Di Fiore; Alejandro Estrada; Rebecca Stumpf; Bryan White; Karen E Nelson; Rob Knight; Steven R Leigh
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 5.  The gut microbiome as a driver of individual variation in cognition and functional behaviour.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Amy C Cooke; Crystal N Johnson; John L Quinn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Dispersal limitation promotes the diversification of the mammalian gut microbiota.

Authors:  Andrew H Moeller; Taichi A Suzuki; Dana Lin; Eileen A Lacey; Samuel K Wasser; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Rates of gut microbiome divergence in mammals.

Authors:  Alex H Nishida; Howard Ochman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  The inconstant gut microbiota of Drosophila species revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis.

Authors:  Adam C-N Wong; John M Chaston; Angela E Douglas
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Colony Location and Captivity Influence the Gut Microbial Community Composition of the Australian Sea Lion (Neophoca cinerea).

Authors:  Tiffany C Delport; Michelle L Power; Robert G Harcourt; Koa N Webster; Sasha G Tetu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Decreased microbial diversity and Lactobacillus group in the intestine of geriatric giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca).

Authors:  Zhirong Peng; Dong Zeng; Qiang Wang; Lili Niu; Xueqin Ni; Fuqin Zou; Mingyue Yang; Hao Sun; Yi Zhou; Qian Liu; Zhongqiong Yin; Kangcheng Pan; Bo Jing
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.