Literature DB >> 23145859

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections, including acute pyelonephritis, in hospitalized adults: results of a prospective, investigator-blinded, randomized study.

José A Vazquez1, Luis Demetrio González Patzán, David Stricklin, Dipesh D Duttaroy, Zouheir Kreidly, Joy Lipka, Carole Sable.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective phase II, randomized, investigator-blinded study (NCT00690378) was to compare the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-cilastatin in hospitalized adults with serious complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) due to Gram-negative pathogens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged between 18 and 90 years with cUTI were enrolled and stratified by infection type (acute pyelonephritis or other cUTI) and randomized 1:1 to receive intravenous ceftazidime 500 mg plus avibactam 125 mg every 8 hours or imipenem-cilastatin 500 mg every 6 hours. Patients meeting pre-specified improvement criteria after 4 days could be switched to oral ciprofloxacin. Patients were treated for a total of 7-14 days. The primary efficacy objective was a favorable microbiological response at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit 5-9 days post-therapy in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients.
RESULTS: Overall, 135 patients received study therapy (safety population); 62 were included in the ME population (ceftazidime-avibactam, n = 27; imipenem-cilastatin, n = 35). The predominant uropathogen was Escherichia coli. Favorable microbiological response was achieved in 70.4% of ME patients receiving ceftazidime-avibactam and 71.4% receiving imipenem-cilastatin at the TOC visit (observed difference -1.1% [95% CI: -27.2%, 25.0%]). Among ME patients with ceftazidime-resistant uropathogens, response was observed in 6/7 (85.7%) receiving ceftazidime-avibactam. Adverse events were observed in 67.6% and 76.1% of patients receiving ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-cilastatin, respectively. Limitations of the study include the small number of patients in the ME population.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam may be similar to that of imipenem-cilastatin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145859     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2012.748653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  68 in total

1.  Perceptions and behaviours of infectious diseases physicians when managing urinary tract infections due to MDR organisms.

Authors:  Sergio E Trevino; Hilary M Babcock; Jeffrey P Henderson; Michael A Lane; Susan E Beekmann; Philip M Polgreen; Jonas Marschall
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Activities of ceftazidime and avibactam against β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Ken Coleman; Premavathy Levasseur; Anne-Marie Girard; Monica Borgonovi; Christine Miossec; Henri Merdjan; George Drusano; David Shlaes; Wright W Nichols
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Development of novel antibacterial drugs to combat multiple resistant organisms.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Elda Righi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Isolates from Respiratory and Blood Specimens from Patients with Nosocomial Pneumonia, Including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia, in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gregory G Stone; Patricia A Bradford; Margaret Tawadrous; Dianna Taylor; Mary Jane Cadatal; Zhangjing Chen; Joseph W Chow
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Successful Treatment of Carbapenemase-Producing Pandrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bacteremia.

Authors:  Jose F Camargo; Jacques Simkins; Thiago Beduschi; Akin Tekin; Laura Aragon; Armando Pérez-Cardona; Clara E Prado; Michele I Morris; Lilian M Abbo; Rafael Cantón
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations: an update.

Authors:  Kamaleddin H M E Tehrani; Nathaniel I Martin
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 8.  Beyond Susceptible and Resistant, Part III: Treatment of Infections due to Gram-Negative Organisms Producing Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Navaneeth Narayanan; Linda Johnson; Conan MacDougall
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

9.  The global challenge of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Michael J Satlin; Stephen G Jenkins; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  The β-Lactams Strike Back: Ceftazidime-Avibactam.

Authors:  Evan J Zasowski; Jeffrey M Rybak; Michael J Rybak
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.705

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.