Literature DB >> 23145857

Efficacy and toxicity of capecitabine-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic or advanced breast cancer: results from ten randomized trials.

Yongqing Wang1, Haiwei Yang, Ji-Fu Wei, Ling Meng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and adverse effects of capecitabine-based chemotherapy versus other regimens reported in previous trials were discordant. The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity profiles of capecitabine-based chemotherapy versus capecitabine-free regimens in patients with metastatic and/or advanced breast cancer.
METHODS: Randomized trials in which capecitabine-based chemotherapy was compared with capecitabine-free chemotherapy were included by searching the PubMed database. Differences in efficacy and grade 3-4 toxicities between capecitabine-based chemotherapy and other chemotherapy were compared.
RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials were included in our meta-analysis. Compared to patients treated with capecitabine-free chemotherapy, patients treated with capecitabine-based chemotherapy did not have a significantly different complete response (odds ratio (OR): 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-1.79, p = 0.231), partial response (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.95-1.41, p = 0.147), and overall response (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.00-1.47, p = 0.053). Compared to the capecitabine-free group, less hematological toxicity and more gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in patients treated with capecitabine-based chemotherapy, including neutropenia (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.19-0.59, p <0.001), anemia (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.20-0.85, p = 0.016), leukocytopenia (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.78, p = 0.002), and diarrhea (OR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.62-3.42, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients in the capecitabine group exhibited a significantly higher rate of grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than the capecitabine-free group (OR: 25.16, 95% CI: 12.27-51.58, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that capecitabine-based chemotherapy is as effective as capecitabine-free chemotherapy in patients with metastatic and/or advanced breast cancer with different toxicity profiles. Capecitabine-based chemotherapy may be better tolerated than capecitabine-free chemotherapy. Due to several limitations in our study, future large randomized trials are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145857     DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2012.748655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  5 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of pirarubicin plus capecitabine versus pirarubicin plus cyclophosphamide in Chinese node-negative breast cancer patients: a 4-year open-label, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Xiaohui Zhang; Yidong Zhou; Feng Mao; Yan Lin; Jinghong Guan; Qiang Sun
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Systemic treatment approaches in her2-negative advanced breast cancer-guidance on the guidelines.

Authors:  A A Joy; M Ghosh; R Fernandes; M J Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Capecitabine for hormone receptor-positive versus hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Siao-Nge Hoon; Peter Kh Lau; Alison M White; Max K Bulsara; Patricia D Banks; Andrew D Redfern
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-26

4.  Metronomic capecitabine in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendrocrine tumors: a suitable regimen and review of the literature.

Authors:  Alberto Bongiovanni; Nada Riva; Sebastiano Calpona; Marianna Ricci; Erica Gunelli; Chiara Liverani; Federico La Manna; Alessandro De Vita; Manuela Monti; Stefano Severi; Federica Pieri; Elena Amadori; Riccardo Galassi; Davide Cavaliere; Alberto Zaccaroni; Andreas Tartaglia; Veronica Lunedei; Andrea Gardini; Laura Mercatali; Dino Amadori; Toni Ibrahim
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Capecitabine in Combination with Standard (Neo)Adjuvant Regimens in Early Breast Cancer: Survival Outcome from a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Ze-Chun Zhang; Qi-Ni Xu; Sui-Ling Lin; Xu-Yuan Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.