| Literature DB >> 23145325 |
Cecilia María Armas-Herrera1, Juan Luis Mora, Carmen Dolores Arbelo, Antonio Rodríguez-Rodríguez.
Abstract
The stability over time of the organic C stocked in soils under undisturbed ecosystems is poorly studied, despite being suitable for detecting changes related to climate fluctuations and global warming. Volcanic soils often show high organic C contents due to the stabilization ofEntities:
Keywords: Andosols; climate changes; litterfall; organic matter fractionation; root biomass; soil respiration; undisturbed ecosystems
Year: 2012 PMID: 23145325 PMCID: PMC3492766 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Organic-rich Andosols under laurel forest vegetation in the Canary Islands.
Figure 2Location of the study sites.
General characteristics of the experimental plots
| Type of habitat | Plot code | Plant community | Dominant plant species | Soil classification (ISSS-ISRIC-FAO, 2006) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowland | L1 | Mature | Hypersalic Solonchaks | |
| L2 | Regressive | Haplic Solonetzs | ||
| Midland | M1 | Riparian laurel forest | Aluandic eutrosilic fulvic Andosols | |
| M2 | Laurel forest | Silandic eutrosilic fulvic Andosols | ||
| M3 | Degraded | Aluandic eutrosilic fulvic Andosols | ||
| M4 | Regressive shrubby heath | Leptic Luvisols | ||
| M5 | Wood plantation | Silandic fulvic Andosols | ||
| Highland | H1 | Humid pine forest | Luvic Phaeozems | |
| H2 | Xeric pine forest | Leptic Cambisols | ||
| H3 | Regressive broom scrub | Silandic fulvic endoleptic Andosols |
Main characteristics of the soils in the study plots
| Profile | Horizon | Depth (cm) | Bulk density (Mg m−3) | pH (H2O) | ECs (dS m−1) | CaCO3 | TC | TOC | TN | Clay | Silt | Sand | Alo+½Feo | P-retention (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g kg−1) | ||||||||||||||
| L1 | ABw | 0–22 | 1.1 | 8.5 | 10.0 | 0.6 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 90 | 179 | 732 | – | – |
| Bw | 22–35 | 1.1 | 8.1 | 29.2 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 76 | 229 | 695 | – | – | |
| BwC | 35–80 | – | 8.0 | 32.1 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 1.1 | 0.2 | 70 | 98 | 833 | – | – | |
| L2 | BwA | 0–22 | 1.3 | 9.3 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 3.5 | 1.9 | 0.3 | 94 | 209 | 697 | – | – |
| Bt | 22–55 | 1.3 | 9.8 | 0.7 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 136 | 296 | 569 | – | – | |
| BtC | 55–70 | 1.4 | 10.0 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 166 | 211 | 623 | – | – | |
| M1 | A1 | 5–25 | 0.4 | 5.7 | – | – | 128 | 139 | 10 | 176 | 522 | 303 | 20 | 89 |
| A2 | 25–70 | 0.7 | 6.3 | – | – | 47 | 44 | 4.6 | 277 | 492 | 231 | 27 | 90 | |
| Bw | 70– >120 | – | 6.1 | – | – | 22 | 19 | 4.1 | 248 | 507 | 245 | – | – | |
| M2 | A | 0–50 | 0.5 | 5.9 | – | – | 87 | 91 | 8.1 | 74 | 652 | 274 | 23 | 91 |
| Bw | 50– >120 | 0.9 | 5.1 | – | – | 15 | 16 | 1.0 | 214 | 597 | 189 | 19 | 5.6 | |
| M3 | ABw | 0–50 | 0.7 | 5.9 | – | – | 127 | 128 | 8.9 | 97 | 448 | 454 | 20 | 86 |
| Bt | 50– >100 | 0.8 | 5.7 | – | – | 61 | 52 | 2.8 | 647 | 226 | 127 | 23 | 89 | |
| M4 | ABw | 2–22 | 0.6 | 4.8 | – | – | 139 | 144 | 6.4 | 134 | 528 | 339 | 15 | 78 |
| Bt | 22–35 | 0.7 | 4.8 | – | – | 71 | 76 | 4.8 | 219 | 509 | 272 | 18 | 90 | |
| M5 | A1 | 7–26 | 0.4 | 6.0 | – | – | 113 | 114 | 7.0 | 97 | 561 | 342 | 45 | 95 |
| A2 | 26–72 | 0.5 | 5.8 | – | – | 63 | 64 | 5.0 | 84 | 668 | 246 | 58 | 96 | |
| Bw | 72– >120 | 0.5 | 5.8 | – | – | 24 | 19 | 2.0 | 110 | 487 | 403 | 76 | 94 | |
| H1 | A | 0–35 | 0.8 | 7.1 | – | – | 44 | 41 | 1.1 | 323 | 329 | 282 | 10 | 43 |
| Bt | 35–100 | 0.8 | 7.1 | – | – | 6.5 | 5.6 | 0.4 | 403 | 382 | 180 | 12 | 45 | |
| H2 | A1 | 0–5 | 1.1 | 5.7 | – | – | 69 | 59 | 7.2 | 127 | 415 | 459 | 5 | 34 |
| A2 | 5–10 | 1.1 | 5.8 | – | – | 45 | 42 | 4.0 | 175 | 461 | 363 | 5 | 35 | |
| BwC | 10–45 | 1.1 | 6.6 | – | – | 9.2 | 9.4 | 0.8 | 266 | 514 | 220 | 3 | 33 | |
| H3 | A | 0–15 | 0.8 | 5.2 | – | – | 122 | 124 | 11 | 69 | 347 | 584 | 22 | 81 |
| BtC | 15–50/100 | 0.9 | 4.9 | – | – | 50 | 48 | 6.3 | 129 | 454 | 417 | 28 | 91 | |
ECs, electrical conductivity in saturated extract; TC, total carbon; TOC, total organic (oxidisable) carbon; TN, total nitrogen; Alo, Feo, acid-oxalate extractable Al and Fe; P-retention, phosphate retention.
Figure 3Rainfall and temperature at the experimental areas during the study period. Source: Cabildo de Tenerife (http://www.agrocabildo.org/agrometeorologia_estaciones.asp).
Figure 4Soil carbon inputs (litterfall) and outputs (respiration) depending on sampling season, year and plot. (a) Litterfall unlignified residues (g C m−2); (b) Litterfall lignified residues (g C m−2); and (c) Soil respiration (mg C-CO2 m−2 h−1, 24 h). L1, Lowland climax scrub; L2, Lowland degraded scrub; M1 and M2, Midland climax forests; M3and M4, Midland degraded vegetation; M5, Midland afforestation; H1 and H2, Highland climax forests; H3, Highland degraded scrub; Y1, Year 1; Y2, Year 2.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results of the litterfall C inputs and soil respiration in relation to the sampling season, year and plot
| L1 | L2 | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | H1 | H2 | H3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonlignified litter C inputs | Season | ||||||||||
| Year | |||||||||||
| C-CO2 | Season | ||||||||||
| Year |
ns, not significant.
Nonsignificant results are omitted.
**P < 0.01; *P < 0.05.
Figure 5Root carbon content (kg m−2, 0–30 cm) depending on sampling year and plot. Values represent means ± SEM (between seasons). L1, Lowland climax scrub; L2, Lowland degraded scrub; M1 and M2, Midland climax forests; M3 and M4, Midland degraded vegetation; M5, Midland afforestation; H1 and H2, Highland climax forests; H3, Highland degraded scrub; Y1, Year 1; Y2, Year 2.
Figure 6Contents of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and humic carbon depending on sampling depth, year and plot. (a) Soil total organic carbon (TOC) (kg m−2); (b) Soil total nitrogen (TN) (kg m−2); and (c) Soil humic carbon (HSC) (kg m−2). Values represent means ± SEM (between seasons). L1, Lowland climax scrub; L2, Lowland degraded scrub; M1 and M2, Midland climax forests; M3 and M4, Midland degraded vegetation; M5, Midland afforestation; H1 and H2, Highland climax forests; H3, Highland degraded scrub; Y1, Year 1; Y2, Year 2.
Figure 7Contents of labile soil organic carbon fractions depending on sampling depth, year and plot. (a) Soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) (g m−2); (b) Soil hot-water extractable carbon (HWC) (g m−2); and (c) Soil water-soluble C (WSC) (g m−2). Values represent means ± SEM (between seasons). L1, Lowland climax scrub; L2, Lowland degraded scrub; M1 and M2, Midland climax forests; M3 and M4, Midland degraded vegetation; M5, Midland afforestation; H1 and H2, Highland climax forests; H3, Highland degraded scrub; Y1, Year 1; Y2, Year 2.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) results of the SOC and TN contents in relation to the sampling season, year, depth, and plot
| L1 | L2 | M1 | M2 | M3 | M4 | M5 | H1 | H2 | H3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOC | Year | ||||||||||
| Depth | |||||||||||
| Season × Year | |||||||||||
| TN | Season | ||||||||||
| Year | |||||||||||
| Depth | |||||||||||
| Season × Year | |||||||||||
| Season × Depth | |||||||||||
| Year × Depth | |||||||||||
| HSC | Year | - | - | ||||||||
| Depth | - | - | |||||||||
| MBC | Season | ||||||||||
| Year | |||||||||||
| Depth | |||||||||||
| Season × Year | |||||||||||
| HWC | Season | ||||||||||
| Year | |||||||||||
| Depth | |||||||||||
| Season × Year | |||||||||||
| WSC | Season | ||||||||||
| Year | |||||||||||
| Depth | |||||||||||
| Season × Depth |
SOC, soil organic C; TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen, HSC, humic C; MBC, microbial biomass C; HWC, hot-water extractable C; WSC, water soluble C.
Nonsignificant results are omitted.
P < 0.01;
P < 0.05.
Interannual variation (%) of the C fluxes and pools and TN of the soils studied in relation to the type of habitat
| C-litterfall | C-CO2 | C-roots | TOC | TN | HSC | MBC | HWC | WSC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowland | −5.3 | +30.6 | +61.3 | −26.4 | −6.9 | − | −61.9 | −29.0 | −50.0 |
| Midland | +0.3 | +2.2 | +2.2 | −13.5 | −9.7 | +0.7 | +30.9 | −11.3 | −36.8 |
| Highland | +51.7 | +53.0 | −30.3 | −24.0 | −20.7 | −18.8 | +3.9 | −18.5 | −35.7 |
| Total | +52.0 | +34.2 | +14.4 | −17.4 | −9.4 | −5.8 | +10.3 | −12.6 | −29.2 |
| ANOVA | |||||||||
| Year | |||||||||
| Habitat | |||||||||
| Year × Habitat | |||||||||
TOC, total organic carbon; TN, total nitrogen, HSC, humic C; MBC, microbial biomass C; HWC, hot-water extractable C; WSC, water soluble C; ns, not significant.
Nonsignificant results are omitted.
P < 0.01;
P < 0.05.
Figure 8Average contents of the main organic carbon pools in soils and plant roots (kg m−2, 0–30 cm) depending on the plot. Values represent means ± SEM (between seasons). HWC, Soil hot-water extractable carbon; WSC, Soil water-soluble carbon; HSC, Soil humic carbon; Other SOC, other soil organic carbon; C-roots, Root carbon content; L1, Lowland climax scrub; L2, Lowland degraded scrub; M1 and M2, Midland climax forests; M3 and M4, Midland degraded vegetation; M5, Midland afforestation; H1 and H2, Highland climax forests; H3, Highland degraded scrub.