| Literature DB >> 23145078 |
Johan Asplund1, Aron Sandling, David A Wardle.
Abstract
In the long-term absence of major disturbances ecosystems enter a state of retrogression, which involves declining soil fertility and consequently a reduction in decomposition rates. Recent studies have looked at how plant traits such as specific leaf mass and amounts of secondary compounds respond to declining soil fertility during retrogression, but there are no comparable studies for lichen traits despite increasing recognition of the role that lichens can play in ecosystem processes. We studied a group of 30 forested islands in northern Sweden differing greatly in fire history, and collectively representing a retrogressive chronosequence, spanning 5000 years. We used this system to explore how specific thallus mass (STM) and carbon based secondary compounds (CBSCs) change in three common epiphytic lichen species (Hypogymnia phsyodes, Melanohalea olivacea and Parmelia sulcata) as soil fertility declines during this retrogression. We found that STMs of lichens increased sharply during retrogression, and for all species soil N to P ratio (which increased during retrogression) was a strong predictor of STM. When expressed per unit area, medullary CBSCs in all species and cortical CBSCs in P. sulcata increased during retrogression. Meanwhile, when expressed per unit mass, only cortical CBSCs in H. physodes responded to retrogression, and in the opposite direction. Given that lichen functional traits are likely to be important in driving ecological processes that drive nutrient and carbon cycling in the way that plant functional traits are, the changes that they undergo during retrogression could potentially be significant for the functioning of the ecosystem.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23145078 PMCID: PMC3493489 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
ANOVA results for island size and species effects on lichen traits.
| STM | Medullary secondary compounds | Cortical secondary compounds | |||||||||
| per mass | per area | per mass | per area | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Island Size (IS) |
|
| 1.597 | 0.221 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Species (S) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| IS×S |
|
| 0.801 | 0.530 |
|
|
|
| 1.351 | 0.276 | |
Results are from two-way split-plot ANOVAs testing for the effect of island size class (large, middle, small) as the main plot factor, and lichen species (M. olivacea, H. physodes and P. sulcata) as the sub-plot factor on specific thallus mass (STM) and medullary and cortical secondary compounds measured per unit mass as well as unit area.
df: IS = 2, 27, S = 2, 54, IS×S = 4, 54, except df for cortical compounds: IS = 2, 27, S = 1, 27, IS×S = 2, 27.
M. olivacea not included in ANOVAs for cortical compounds because all values were zero.
Figure 1Response of lichen specific thallus mass to island size.
Values are given for mean+SE of M. olivacea, H. physodes and P. sulcata on large small, medium and small sized islands. Letters on top of bars denotes significant differences (p<0.001, Tukey’s post hoc test) within species. ANOVA results given in table 1.
Relationships between lichen traits and environmental variables.
|
|
|
| ||||||||
| STM | Medullary per area | STM | Corticalper mass | Corticalper area | Medullaryper area | STM | Corticalper mass | Corticalper area | Medullaryper area | |
| STM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.350 |
|
| Bark pH |
| 0.359 |
|
| 0.125 |
|
| −0.010 |
|
|
| Bark roughness | −0.218 | −0.281 | −0.295 |
|
|
| −0.327 | 0.359 | −0.096 |
|
| DBH | −0.302 | −0.180 |
|
| 0.006 |
|
| −0.008 | −0.228 | −0.327 |
| Humus depth |
|
|
|
| 0.359 |
|
| −0.137 | 0.310 |
|
| Light | 0.318 | 0.317 |
|
| −0.024 | 0.343 |
| −0.220 | 0.318 | 0.323 |
| Productivity |
|
|
|
| −0.292 |
|
| 0.052 |
| −0.351 |
| Soil N:P |
|
|
|
| 0.344 |
|
| −0.196 | 0.302 |
|
| Soil pH | −0.199 | 0.060 |
| 0.247 | −0.219 | −0.215 | −0.134 | 0.219 | −0.010 | −0.211 |
| Soil total N |
| 0.256 |
|
| 0.175 | 0.259 |
| −0.149 | 0.191 |
|
| Soil total P |
| −0.324 |
|
|
|
| −0.354 | 0.214 |
| −0.268 |
Values given are Spearman rank correlations between specific thallus mass (STM) and medullary and cortical secondary compounds expressed as per thallus mass as well as per thallus area of three lichens species and a number of environmental variables measured in the soil and on the host tree (B. pubescens) across gradient of 30 islands differing in size. n = 30 islands.
, ** and *** denotes P = 0.05, 0.01 and 0.001, respectively.
Medullary compounds per unit mass never showed a correlation with any environmental variable and are therefore not included.
ANOVA results for properties of B. pubescens measured across the three island size classes.
| Large | Medium | Small |
|
| |
| Bark pH | 3.97±0.03a | 4.00±0.03a | 4.12±0.05b |
|
|
| Bark roughness | 2.05±0.13a | 1.85±0.13a | 1.65±0.15a | 2.06 | 0.147 |
| Diameter at breast height (cm) | 13.8±4.0a | 12.4±4.0a | 11.6±4.1a | 2.70 | 0.086 |
Values given are Mean ± SE.
DF = 2, 27.
Three level scale from smooth to very rough.
Letters distinguish significant differences (P<0.05, Tukey’s post hoc test).
Figure 2Response of lichen secondary compounds to island size.
Values are given for concentrations (mean+SE) of medullary (A and C) and cortical (B and D) carbon based secondary compounds expressed per thallus mass (A–B) as well as per thallus area (C–D) in three lichen species across three island size classes. Melanohalea olivacea lacks cortical compounds and is therefore not included in panels B and D. Letters within species distinguish significant differences (P<0.05, Tukey’s post hoc test) between island size class.