Literature DB >> 23145042

Systematic determination of replication activity type highlights interconnections between replication, chromatin structure and nuclear localization.

Shlomit Farkash-Amar1, Yaara David, Andreas Polten, Hadas Hezroni, Yonina C Eldar, Eran Meshorer, Zohar Yakhini, Itamar Simon.   

Abstract

DNA replication is a highly regulated process, with each genomic locus replicating at a distinct time of replication (ToR). Advances in ToR measurement technology enabled several genome-wide profiling studies that revealed tight associations between ToR and general genomic features and a remarkable ToR conservation in mammals. Genome wide studies further showed that at the hundreds kb-to-megabase scale the genome can be divided into constant ToR regions (CTRs) in which the replication process propagates at a faster pace due to the activation of multiple origins and temporal transition regions (TTRs) in which the replication process propagates at a slower pace. We developed a computational tool that assigns a ToR to every measured locus and determines its replication activity type (CTR versus TTR). Our algorithm, ARTO (Analysis of Replication Timing and Organization), uses signal processing methods to fit a constant piece-wise linear curve to the measured raw data. We tested our algorithm and provide performance and usability results. A Matlab implementation of ARTO is available at http://bioinfo.cs.technion.ac.il/people/zohar/ARTO/. Applying our algorithm to ToR data measured in multiple mouse and human samples allowed precise genome-wide ToR determination and replication activity type characterization. Analysis of the results highlighted the plasticity of the replication program. For example, we observed significant ToR differences in 10-25% of the genome when comparing different tissue types. Our analyses also provide evidence for activity type differences in up to 30% of the probes. Integration of the ToR data with multiple aspects of chromosome organization characteristics suggests that ToR plays a role in shaping the regional chromatin structure. Namely, repressive chromatin marks, are associated with late ToR both in TTRs and CTRs. Finally, characterization of the differences between TTRs and CTRs, with matching ToR, revealed that TTRs are associated with compact chromatin and are located significantly closer to the nuclear envelope. Supplementary material is available. Raw and processed data were deposited in Geo (GSE17236).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23145042      PMCID: PMC3492150          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  47 in total

1.  Evidence that a single replication fork proceeds from early to late replicating domains in the IgH locus in a non-B cell line.

Authors:  O V Ermakova; L H Nguyen; R D Little; C Chevillard; R Riblet; N Ashouian; B K Birshtein; C L Schildkraut
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 17.970

2.  Histone acetylation regulates the time of replication origin firing.

Authors:  Maria Vogelauer; Liudmilla Rubbi; Isabelle Lucas; Bonita J Brewer; Michael Grunstein
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Replication and subnuclear location dynamics of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus in B-lineage cells.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Olga V Ermakova; Roy Riblet; Barbara K Birshtein; Carl L Schildkraut
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Progressive activation of DNA replication initiation in large domains of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus during B cell development.

Authors:  Paolo Norio; Settapong Kosiyatrakul; Qiaoxin Yang; Zeqiang Guan; Nicholas M Brown; Sharon Thomas; Roy Riblet; Carl L Schildkraut
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Eran Meshorer; Dhananjay Yellajoshula; Eric George; Peter J Scambler; David T Brown; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 12.270

6.  Microfluorometric detection of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human metaphase chromosomes.

Authors:  S A Latt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Replication structure of the human beta-globin gene domain.

Authors:  D Kitsberg; S Selig; I Keshet; H Cedar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Fibroblast growth factor 2 modulates transforming growth factor beta signaling in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and human ESCs (hESCs) to support hESC self-renewal.

Authors:  Boris Greber; Hans Lehrach; James Adjaye
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 6.277

9.  Delineation of DNA replication time zones by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  S Selig; K Okumura; D C Ward; H Cedar
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Replication fork polarity gradients revealed by megabase-sized U-shaped replication timing domains in human cell lines.

Authors:  Antoine Baker; Benjamin Audit; Chun-Long Chen; Benoit Moindrot; Antoine Leleu; Guillaume Guilbaud; Aurélien Rappailles; Cédric Vaillant; Arach Goldar; Fabien Mongelard; Yves d'Aubenton-Carafa; Olivier Hyrien; Claude Thermes; Alain Arneodo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  9 in total

1.  Germline DNA replication timing shapes mammalian genome composition.

Authors:  Yishai Yehuda; Britny Blumenfeld; Nina Mayorek; Kirill Makedonski; Oriya Vardi; Leonor Cohen-Daniel; Yousef Mansour; Shulamit Baror-Sebban; Hagit Masika; Marganit Farago; Michael Berger; Shai Carmi; Yosef Buganim; Amnon Koren; Itamar Simon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  S Phase Duration Is Determined by Local Rate and Global Organization of Replication.

Authors:  Avraham Greenberg; Itamar Simon
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07

Review 3.  DNA replication timing, genome stability and cancer: late and/or delayed DNA replication timing is associated with increased genomic instability.

Authors:  Nathan Donley; Mathew J Thayer
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 15.707

4.  The mutation spectrum in genomic late replication domains shapes mammalian GC content.

Authors:  Ephraim Kenigsberg; Yishai Yehuda; Lisette Marjavaara; Andrea Keszthelyi; Andrei Chabes; Amos Tanay; Itamar Simon
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Replication Stress, Genomic Instability, and Replication Timing: A Complex Relationship.

Authors:  Lina-Marie Briu; Chrystelle Maric; Jean-Charles Cadoret
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Dynamic changes in replication timing and gene expression during lineage specification of human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Rivera-Mulia; Quinton Buckley; Takayo Sasaki; Jared Zimmerman; Ruth A Didier; Kristopher Nazor; Jeanne F Loring; Zheng Lian; Sherman Weissman; Allan J Robins; Thomas C Schulz; Laura Menendez; Michael J Kulik; Stephen Dalton; Haitham Gabr; Tamer Kahveci; David M Gilbert
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  The links between chromatin spatial organization and biological function.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez; Pernilla Bjerling
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.407

8.  Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation.

Authors:  Benjamin D Pope; Tyrone Ryba; Vishnu Dileep; Feng Yue; Weisheng Wu; Olgert Denas; Daniel L Vera; Yanli Wang; R Scott Hansen; Theresa K Canfield; Robert E Thurman; Yong Cheng; Günhan Gülsoy; Jonathan H Dennis; Michael P Snyder; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; James Taylor; Ross C Hardison; Tamer Kahveci; Bing Ren; David M Gilbert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Perturbations in the Replication Program Contribute to Genomic Instability in Cancer.

Authors:  Britny Blumenfeld; Micha Ben-Zimra; Itamar Simon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.