| Literature DB >> 23144799 |
Norberto Assis Membrive1, Gesse Rodrigues, Kezia Peres Gualda, Marcos Vinícius Zandonadi Bernal, Diego Molina Oliveira, Maria Valdrinez Campana Lonardoni, Ueslei Teodoro, Jorge Juarez Vieira Teixeira, Thaís Gomes Verzignassi Silveira.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the importance of dogs, other domesticated animals and environmental characteristics as risk factors in the epidemiology of American cutaneous leishmaniasis (ACL). A retrospective survey of cases of human ACL in the last ten years and visits to homes in rural locations were carried out in the municipality of Arapongas (southern Brazil) from 2008 to 2010. ACL in humans was significantly associated with a distance of up to 25 meters from the residence to a forest area (OR 5.08; 95% CI: 1.35-21.04), undergrowth area (OR 6.80; 95% CI: 1.69-45.33) and stream (OR 5.87; 95% CI: 1.15-24.59); banana plants near the residence (OR 5.98; 95% CI: 1.49-39.84), absence of ceiling below the roof in the residence (OR 7.30; 95% CI: 1.26-158.1), the dumping of trash in the forest area (OR 26.33; 95% CI: 7.32-93.46) and presence of ACL in dogs in the surrounding area (OR 4.39; 95% CI: 1.37-13.45). In dogs, ACL was associated with a distance of 25 to 50 meters and 51 to 100 meters, respectively, from the residence to a forest area (OR 2.59; 95% CI: 1.08-5.98; OR 3.29; 95% CI: 1.64-6.62), the presence of a stream up to 25 m from the residence (OR 6.23; 95% CI: 2.34-16.54) and banana plants near the residence (OR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25-0.80). In the locations studied in the municipality of Arapongas (Brazil), the results reveal that canine infection increases the risk of human infection by ACL and the characteristics surrounding the residence increase the risk of infection in both humans and dogs. Thus, integrated environmental management could be a useful measure to avoid contact between humans and phlebotomines.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23144799 PMCID: PMC3489835 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Geo-referencing of rural locations studied in the municipality of Arapongas, State of Paraná, Brazil.
Results of laboratory exams used for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis in canine population in rural locations of the municipality of Arapongas, State of Paraná, Brazil.
| Dogs | Parasite search(positive/total) | PCR in lesion(positive/total) | IIF(positive/total) | At least one positive test |
| With lesion (n = 48) | 25/30 | 25/30 | 27/48 | 44/48 |
| Without lesion (n = 1055) | – | – | 47/1055 | 47/1055 |
| Total | 25/30 | 25/30 | 74/1103 | 91/1103 |
PCR: polymerase chain reaction.
IIF: indirect immunofluorescence reaction.
Environmental characteristics as risk factors for human and canine cutaneous leishmaniasis in rural locations of the municipality of Arapongas, State of Paraná, Brazil.
| Characteristics | Cases of human ACL in locations | Cases of canine ACL in locations | |||||||
| Presence | Absence | OR (95% CI) | p-value* | Presence | Absence | OR (95% IC) | p-value* | ||
| Distance between the residence and forest (meters) | |||||||||
| >100 | 4 | 198 | 1 | 20 | 182 | 1 | |||
| 51–100 | 1 | 74 | 0.67 (0.03–5.43) | 0.79 | 20 | 55 | 3.29 (1.64–6.62) | <0.001* | |
| 25–50 | 3 | 42 | 3.51 (0.63–17.59) | 0.14 | 10 | 35 | 2.59 (1.08–5.98) | 0.03* | |
| 1–25 | 6 | 58 | 5.08 (1.35–21.04) | <0.02* | 10 | 54 | 1.68 (0.72–3.79) | 0.22 | |
| Distance between the residence and undergrowth (meters) | |||||||||
| >25 | 2 | 198 | 1 | 33 | 167 | 1 | |||
| 1–25 | 12 | 174 | 6.80 (1.69–45.33) | <0.01* | 27 | 159 | 0.86 (0.49–1.50) | 0.59 | |
| Distance between the residence and stream (meters) | |||||||||
| >100 | 7 | 236 | 1 | 35 | 208 | 1 | |||
| 51–100 | 1 | 75 | 0.45 (0.02–2.98) | 0.50 | 7 | 69 | 0.64 (0.25–1.47) | 0.31 | |
| 26–50 | 3 | 44 | 2.29 (0.47–9.07) | 0.27 | 8 | 39 | 1.29 (0.52–2.94) | 0.55 | |
| 1–25 | 3 | 17 | 5.87 (1.15–24.59) | 0.04* | 10 | 10 | 6.23 (2.34–16.54) | <0.001* | |
| Distance between the residence and banana plants (meters) | |||||||||
| >10 | 2 | 186 | 1 | 39 | 149 | 1 | |||
| 1–10 | 12 | 186 | 5.98 (1.49–39.84) | <0.01* | 21 | 177 | 0.45 (0.25–0.80) | <0.01* | |
| Distance between the residence and pigsty (meters) | |||||||||
| >10 | 13 | 273 | 1 | 39 | 247 | 1 | |||
| ≤10 | 1 | 99 | 0.21 (0.01–1.24) | 0.09 | 21 | 79 | 1.68 (0.92–3.02) | 0.09 | |
| Distance between the residence and hen shed (meters) | |||||||||
| >10 | 08 | 230 | 1 | 32 | 206 | ||||
| ≤10 | 06 | 142 | 1.21 (0.39–3.65) | 0.72 | 28 | 120 | 1.50 (0.86–2.62) | 0.16 | |
| Ceiling in the residence | |||||||||
| Absence | 13 | 238 | 7.30 (1.26–158.1) | 0.02* | 16 | 119 | 1 | ||
| Presence | 1 | 134 | 1 | 44 | 207 | 1.58 (0.86–2.99) | 0.14 | ||
| Trash dumped in the forest | |||||||||
| No | 8 | 362 | 1 | 56 | 314 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 6 | 10 | 26.33 (7.32–93.46) | <0.001* | 4 | 12 | 1.86 (0.50–5.79) | 0.31 | |
| Animals in and around the home | |||||||||
| Absence | 2 | 90 | 1 | 12 | 80 | 1 | |||
| Rodents | 10 | 152 | 2.95 (0.70–20.18) | 0.16 | 20 | 142 | 0.94 (0.44–2.08) | 0.86 | |
| Opossums | 0 | 9 | – | 0.83 | 0 | 9 | - | 0.81 | |
| Rodents and opossums | 2 | 121 | 0.74 (0.08–7.27) | 0.78 | 28 | 95 | 1.96 (0.94–4.23) | 0.07 | |
| Rodents and/or opossums | 12 | 282 | 1.91 (0.47–12.80) | 0.43 | 48 | 246 | 1.30 (0.67–2.66) | 0.46 | |
| Cases of canine ACL in location | |||||||||
| Absence | 8 | 318 | 1 | ||||||
| Presence | 6 | 54 | 4.39 (1.37–13.45) | 0.01* | |||||
| Number of dogs per location | |||||||||
| 1 | 4 | 104 | 1 | ||||||
| 2–5 | 41 | 202 | 5.26 (1.98–17.66) | <0.001* | |||||
| 6–9 | 10 | 18 | 14.00 (4.05–56.51) | <0.001* | |||||
| ≥10 | 5 | 2 | 57.19 (8.81–536.71) | <0.001* | |||||
OR: Odds Ratio, CI: Confidence interval, * Significant association (p<0.05).