| Literature DB >> 23144654 |
Anders Gonçalves da Silva1, Ivana C L Cunha, Walter S Santos, Sérgio L B Luz, Paulo E M Ribolla, Fernando Abad-Franch.
Abstract
The mosquito Aedes aegypti, the dengue virus vector, has spread throughout the tropics in historical times. While this suggests man-mediated dispersal, estimating contemporary connectivity among populations has remained elusive. Here, we use a large mtDNA dataset and a Bayesian coalescent framework to test a set of hypotheses about gene flow among American Ae. aegypti populations. We assessed gene flow patterns at the continental and subregional (Amazon basin) scales. For the Americas, our data favor a stepping-stone model in which gene flow is higher among adjacent populations but in which, at the same time, North American and southeastern Brazilian populations are directly connected, likely via sea trade. Within Amazonia, the model with highest support suggests extensive gene flow among major cities; Manaus, located at the center of the subregional transport network, emerges as a potentially important connecting hub. Our results suggest substantial connectivity across Ae. aegypti populations in the Americas. As long-distance active dispersal has not been observed in this species, our data support man-mediated dispersal as a major determinant of the genetic structure of American Ae. aegypti populations. The inferred topology of interpopulation connectivity can inform network models of Ae. aegypti and dengue spread.Entities:
Keywords: Amazonia; Migrate-N; ND4; coalescent; dengue; disease spread; networks
Year: 2012 PMID: 23144654 PMCID: PMC3492893 DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00244.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Figure 1Geographic location of Aedes aegypti populations included in the study: (A) in the Americas (N = 2811 specimens from five locations: Mexico-North America, Venezuela, Peru, Brazilian Amazon, and southeastern Brazil); and (B) within the Amazon region (N = 74 specimens from four locations: Boa Vista, Manaus, Belém, and Rio Branco-Porto Velho). In (A), the model ranked first at the continental scale is represented by the arrows. In (B), major navigable rivers (Negro, Solimões, Purus, Madeira, Tapajós, Xingu, Tocantins, and Amazonas) and highways (BR174, BR319, BR364, BR163, BR153, and BR316) are presented; the broken line for BR319 indicates that this highway is only in use during a few months in the dry season and is therefore not used for routine commercial transport.
Figure 2Models examined at each sampling scale: (A) continent; and (B) Amazon. BrAM, Brazilian Amazon; SEBr, southeastern Brazil; PE, Peru; VZ, Venezuela; M-NA, Mexico-North America; MAO, Manaus; BEL, Belém; BV, Boa Vista RB-PV, Rio Branco-Porto Velho. Arrows indicate gene flow between nodes.
Test of demographic stability and selective neutrality across 322 bp of the Aedes aegypti ND4 gene sampled across the Americas
| Demographic stability | Neutrality tests | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale | Population | |||||
| Continent | Mexico-North America | 0.15 | 7.17 | 3.45 | 1.00 | 2.51 |
| Venezuela | 0.14 | 9.82 | 2.25 | 1.40 | 2.10 | |
| Peru | 0.21 | 14.26 | 2.63 | 1.44 | 2.16 | |
| Brazilian Amazon | 0.18 | 1.93 | 2.16 | 0.57 | 1.35 | |
| Southeastern Brazil | 0.15 | 1.41 | 1.38 | 1.01 | 1.36 | |
| Amazon | Boa Vista | 0.13 | 0.31 | −0.80 | −0.44 | −0.60 |
| Manaus | 0.09 | 0.19 | −0.78 | 0.88 | 0.44 | |
| Belém | 0.22 | 0.97 | 1.75 | 1.14 | 1.50 | |
| Rio Branco-Porto Velho | 0.17 | 0.86 | −2.04 | −3.20 | −3.33 | |
Values significantly larger than expected by the neutral coalescent (P < 0.025).
Values significantly smaller than expected by the neutral coalescent (P < 0.025).
R (Ramos-Onsins and Rozas 2002); Fs (Fu 1997); D (Tajima 1989); and D and F (Fu and Li 1993).
Marginal log-likelihood values, log Bayes factor and ranks of continental and Amazon-scale gene flow network models
| Scale | Model ( | Marginal log-likelihood | Log Bayes factor | Posterior probability | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continent | Stepping-stone 1 (15) | −692.40 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 1 |
| Stepping-stone 2 (13) | −709.19 | −33.58 | 10−8 | 2 | |
| Full migration (25) | −714.40 | −44.00 | 10−10 | 3 | |
| Panmixia (1) | −725.38 | −65.96 | 10−15 | 4 | |
| Isolation (5) | −947.11 | −509.42 | 0.00 | 5 | |
| Amazon | Full migration (16) | −548.71 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 1 |
| Panmixia (1) | −551.59 | −5.76 | 0.05 | 2 | |
| Stepping-stone (10) | −574.02 | −50.62 | 10−12 | 3 | |
| Isolation (4) | −657.24 | −217.06 | 10−48 | 4 |