BACKGROUND: Survival estimates after curative surgery for gastric cancer are based on AJCC staging, or on more accurate multivariable nomograms. However, the risk of dying of gastric cancer is not constant over time, with most deaths occurring in the first 2 years after resection. Therefore, the prognosis for a patient who survives this critical period improves. This improvement over time is termed conditional probability of survival (CPS). Objectives of this study were to develop a CPS nomogram predicting 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) from the day of surgery for patients surviving a specified period of time after a curative gastrectomy and to explore whether variables available with follow-up improve the nomogram in the follow-up setting. METHODS: A CPS nomogram was developed from a combined US-Dutch dataset, containing 1,642 patients who underwent an R0 resection with or without chemotherapy/radiotherapy for gastric cancer. Weight loss, performance status, hemoglobin, and albumin 1 year after resection were added to the baseline variables of this nomogram. RESULTS: The CPS nomogram was highly discriminating (concordance index: 0.772). Surviving 1, 2, or 3 years gives a median improvement of 5-year DSS from surgery of 7.2, 19.1, and 31.6 %, compared with the baseline prediction directly after surgery. Introduction of variables available at 1-year follow-up did not improve the nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: A robust gastric cancer nomogram was developed to predict survival for patients alive at time points after surgery. Introduction of additional variables available after 1 year of follow-up did not further improve this nomogram.
BACKGROUND: Survival estimates after curative surgery for gastric cancer are based on AJCC staging, or on more accurate multivariable nomograms. However, the risk of dying of gastric cancer is not constant over time, with most deaths occurring in the first 2 years after resection. Therefore, the prognosis for a patient who survives this critical period improves. This improvement over time is termed conditional probability of survival (CPS). Objectives of this study were to develop a CPS nomogram predicting 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) from the day of surgery for patients surviving a specified period of time after a curative gastrectomy and to explore whether variables available with follow-up improve the nomogram in the follow-up setting. METHODS: A CPS nomogram was developed from a combined US-Dutch dataset, containing 1,642 patients who underwent an R0 resection with or without chemotherapy/radiotherapy for gastric cancer. Weight loss, performance status, hemoglobin, and albumin 1 year after resection were added to the baseline variables of this nomogram. RESULTS: The CPS nomogram was highly discriminating (concordance index: 0.772). Surviving 1, 2, or 3 years gives a median improvement of 5-year DSS from surgery of 7.2, 19.1, and 31.6 %, compared with the baseline prediction directly after surgery. Introduction of variables available at 1-year follow-up did not improve the nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: A robust gastric cancer nomogram was developed to predict survival for patients alive at time points after surgery. Introduction of additional variables available after 1 year of follow-up did not further improve this nomogram.
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Hai-Rim Shin; Freddie Bray; David Forman; Colin Mathers; Donald Maxwell Parkin Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Andrew J Stephenson; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Fernando J Bianco; Zohar A Dotan; Christopher J DiBlasio; Alwyn Reuther; Eric A Klein; Michael W Kattan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Koen C M J Peeters; Michael W Kattan; Henk H Hartgrink; Elma Klein Kranenbarg; Martin S Karpeh; Murray F Brennan; Cornelis J H van de Velde Journal: Cancer Date: 2005-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Yuhree Kim; Georgios A Margonis; Jason D Prescott; Thuy B Tran; Lauren M Postlewait; Shishir K Maithel; Tracy S Wang; Jason A Glenn; Ioannis Hatzaras; Rivfka Shenoy; John E Phay; Kara Keplinger; Ryan C Fields; Linda X Jin; Sharon M Weber; Ahmed Salem; Jason K Sicklick; Shady Gad; Adam C Yopp; John C Mansour; Quan-Yang Duh; Natalie Seiser; Carmen C Solorzano; Colleen M Kiernan; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Edward A Levine; George A Poultsides; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Giuseppe Verlato; Daniele Marrelli; Simone Accordini; Maria Bencivenga; Alberto Di Leo; Alberto Marchet; Roberto Petrioli; Giacomo Zoppini; Michele Muggeo; Franco Roviello; Giovanni de Manzoni Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-06-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: David Luyimbazi; Rebecca A Nelson; Audrey H Choi; Lily Li; Joseph Chao; Virginia Sun; John B Hamner; Joseph Kim Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Masaya Nakauchi; Colin M Court; Laura H Tang; Mithat Gönen; Yelena Y Janjigian; Steven B Maron; Daniela Molena; Daniel G Coit; Murray F Brennan; Vivian E Strong Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 6.532