Literature DB >> 23143529

How reliable is the Internet for caregivers on their decision to vaccinate their child against influenza? Results from googling in two languages.

Selim Oncel1, Müge Alvur.   

Abstract

We have chosen Google, which is the most widely used search engine, to simulate a parent's experience in trying to find an answer on whether to have her/his child vaccinated against influenza. In doing this, we aimed to find out the chances that a parent with usual Internet searching tendencies may encounter right, wrong, and irrelevant answers in her/his search in the world wide web. We searched the Internet for an answer to the question "Should I make my child vaccinated against influenza?" by using the keywords "influenza", "vaccine", and "children" in two languages (English and Turkish). The "correct" answer was at least one clear statement meaning that annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all children (aged 6 months-18 years). Thirty-two of the 112 websites and 45 of the 103 websites had the correct answer, whereas 24 and 46 websites contained incorrect information in English and Turkish searches, respectively. Only non-relevant information was found in 56 English and 12 Turkish websites. When the first page of search results were taken into account, correctness and incorrectness were observed in six and four English and four and six in Turkish websites, respectively. Our findings call for the urgent need to check public-oriented healthcare information on the Internet for accuracy, completeness, and consistency. We have arrived at a conclusion that the information on the Internet cannot and should not be a substitute for routine care by primary care physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23143529     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-012-1889-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  11 in total

1.  Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  P K Beredjiklian; D J Bozentka; D R Steinberg; J Bernstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; John Powell; Oliver Kuss; Eun-Ryoung Sa
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Lumbar disc herniation: evaluation of information on the internet.

Authors:  David L Greene; A Joshua Appel; Steven E Reinert; Mark A Palumbo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Information on the World Wide Web--how useful is it for parents?

Authors:  Nurain Z Sim; Lara Kitteringham; Lewis Spitz; Agostino Pierro; Edward Kiely; David Drake; Joe Curry
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews.

Authors:  Gunther Eysenbach; Christian Köhler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-09

6.  Vascular surgery and the Internet: a poor source of patient-oriented information.

Authors:  L C Soot; G L Moneta; J M Edwards
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Use of the Internet by parents of paediatric patients.

Authors:  Brynn K Wainstein; Katy Sterling-Levis; Sally A Baker; Jonathan Taitz; Michael Brydon
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.954

8.  Use of the internet by parents of paediatric outpatients.

Authors:  C Tuffrey; F Finlay
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Internet use by parents of children undergoing outpatient otolaryngology procedures.

Authors:  Mark Boston; Elizabeth Ruwe; Angie Duggins; J Paul Willging
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-08

10.  Health information seeking by parents in the Internet age.

Authors:  Kaylyn Khoo; Penny Bolt; Franz E Babl; Susan Jury; Ran D Goldman
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.954

View more
  4 in total

1.  Vaccine criticism on the Internet: Propositions for future research.

Authors:  Jeremy K Ward; Patrick Peretti-Watel; Pierre Verger
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  How often people google for vaccination: Qualitative and quantitative insights from a systematic search of the web-based activities using Google Trends.

Authors:  Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Ilaria Barberis; Roberto Rosselli; Vincenza Gianfredi; Daniele Nucci; Massimo Moretti; Tania Salvatori; Gianfranco Martucci; Mariano Martini
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Can Digital Tools Be Used for Improving Immunization Programs?

Authors:  Alberto E Tozzi; Francesco Gesualdo; Angelo D'Ambrosio; Elisabetta Pandolfi; Eleonora Agricola; Pierluigi Lopalco
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2016-03-08

4.  Mothers' Facebook posts about infant health: findings from the Grow2Gether study.

Authors:  Stacey Kallem; Rachel S Gruver; Senbagam Virudachalam; Alexander G Fiks
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.