AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to study diurnal variation in glucose regulation by examining the effects of time of day and fasting duration on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 h post-load plasma glucose (2hPG) and HbA(1c) levels. METHODS: We analysed data from 5,978 non-diabetic white men and women from the prospective Whitehall II Study. All studied participants fasted for at least 8 h before a clinical examination, which included an OGTT and anthropometric measurements. We fitted mixed-effects models for FPG, 2hPG and HbA(1c) as outcome variables, and time of day and/or fasting duration as explanatory variables. Models were adjusted for age, BMI and study phase. RESULTS: Time of day and fasting duration were associated inversely with FPG and positively with 2hPG. The mean difference between measures at 08:00 and 15:00 hours in men/women was -0.46 (95% CI -0.50, -0.42) mmol/l/-0.39 (95% CI -0.46, -0.31) mmol/l and 1.39 (95% CI 1.25, 1.52) mmol/l/1.19 (95% CI 0.96, 1.42) mmol/l for FPG and 2hPG, respectively. HbA(1c) levels were independent of either time. Time of day and fasting duration were independently associated with 2hPG. In contrast, the effect of fasting duration on FPG was markedly attenuated with adjustment for time of day. Ageing, but not obesity, was associated with increased diurnal variation in glucose tolerance. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Both time of day and fasting duration should be considered in clinical practice and epidemiological studies, since they have clinically relevant effects on FPG and 2hPG levels. As biochemically expected, HbA(1c) levels are independent of time of blood sampling and fasting duration.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to study diurnal variation in glucose regulation by examining the effects of time of day and fasting duration on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 h post-load plasma glucose (2hPG) and HbA(1c) levels. METHODS: We analysed data from 5,978 non-diabetic white men and women from the prospective Whitehall II Study. All studied participants fasted for at least 8 h before a clinical examination, which included an OGTT and anthropometric measurements. We fitted mixed-effects models for FPG, 2hPG and HbA(1c) as outcome variables, and time of day and/or fasting duration as explanatory variables. Models were adjusted for age, BMI and study phase. RESULTS: Time of day and fasting duration were associated inversely with FPG and positively with 2hPG. The mean difference between measures at 08:00 and 15:00 hours in men/women was -0.46 (95% CI -0.50, -0.42) mmol/l/-0.39 (95% CI -0.46, -0.31) mmol/l and 1.39 (95% CI 1.25, 1.52) mmol/l/1.19 (95% CI 0.96, 1.42) mmol/l for FPG and 2hPG, respectively. HbA(1c) levels were independent of either time. Time of day and fasting duration were independently associated with 2hPG. In contrast, the effect of fasting duration on FPG was markedly attenuated with adjustment for time of day. Ageing, but not obesity, was associated with increased diurnal variation in glucose tolerance. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Both time of day and fasting duration should be considered in clinical practice and epidemiological studies, since they have clinically relevant effects on FPG and 2hPG levels. As biochemically expected, HbA(1c) levels are independent of time of blood sampling and fasting duration.
Authors: Adam G Tabák; Markus Jokela; Tasnime N Akbaraly; Eric J Brunner; Mika Kivimäki; Daniel R Witte Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert J Goldberg; Chang Ye; Mathew Sermer; Philip W Connelly; Anthony J G Hanley; Bernard Zinman; Ravi Retnakaran Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: K Faerch; J S Quist; A Hulman; D R Witte; A G Tabak; E J Brunner; M Kivimäki; M E Jørgensen; S Panda; D Vistisen Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2019-04-11 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Jonas S Quist; Marie M Jensen; Kim K B Clemmensen; Hanne Pedersen; Natasja Bjerre; Joachim Størling; Martin B Blond; Nicolai J Wewer Albrechtsen; Jens J Holst; Signe S Torekov; Dorte Vistisen; Marit E Jørgensen; Satchidananda Panda; Christina Brock; Graham Finlayson; Kristine Færch Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 2.692