BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of implanted pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and a rising incidence of malignant tumors, there is a growing probability of radiation-mediated device dysfunction. The only guidelines for the management of patients with cardiac pacemakers in the case of radiation therapy were published in 1994 and have not been updated since then. Based on the current evidence and modern device technology, the present paper aims to develop contemporary and interdisciplinary safety recommendations for the minimization of patient risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature research was carried out including the most relevant medical electronic databases. The search yielded 147 articles published between 1994 and 2012 of which 45 met the selection criteria and of these studies 34 presented primary data (9 in vitro and 25 in vivo studies). The impact of ionizing radiation varied significantly between implanted devices and ranged from no functional changes to complete loss of function. Important device dysfunctions included changes in sensing capability, altered pacing pulses or rate, changed or disabled tachyarrhythmia ICD therapies, early battery depletion and loss of telemetry. Modern pacemakers and ICDs are more sensitive to radiation than older models. Potentially life-threatening complications were observed after exposure of the pulse generator to comparatively low radiation doses (0.11 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: Practical recommendations for patient management and safety are presented that can be readily adopted by any institution carrying out radiation therapy.
BACKGROUND: With increasing numbers of implanted pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and a rising incidence of malignant tumors, there is a growing probability of radiation-mediated device dysfunction. The only guidelines for the management of patients with cardiac pacemakers in the case of radiation therapy were published in 1994 and have not been updated since then. Based on the current evidence and modern device technology, the present paper aims to develop contemporary and interdisciplinary safety recommendations for the minimization of patient risk. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature research was carried out including the most relevant medical electronic databases. The search yielded 147 articles published between 1994 and 2012 of which 45 met the selection criteria and of these studies 34 presented primary data (9 in vitro and 25 in vivo studies). The impact of ionizing radiation varied significantly between implanted devices and ranged from no functional changes to complete loss of function. Important device dysfunctions included changes in sensing capability, altered pacing pulses or rate, changed or disabled tachyarrhythmia ICD therapies, early battery depletion and loss of telemetry. Modern pacemakers and ICDs are more sensitive to radiation than older models. Potentially life-threatening complications were observed after exposure of the pulse generator to comparatively low radiation doses (0.11 Gy). CONCLUSIONS: Practical recommendations for patient management and safety are presented that can be readily adopted by any institution carrying out radiation therapy.
Authors: Panos E Vardas; Angelo Auricchio; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Jean-Claude Daubert; Helmut Drexler; Hugo Ector; Maurizio Gasparini; Cecilia Linde; Francisco Bello Morgado; Ali Oto; Richard Sutton; Maria Trusz-Gluza Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-08-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: T Wadasadawala; A Pandey; J P Agarwal; R Jalali; S G Laskar; S Chowdhary; A Budrukkar; R Sarin; D Deshpande; A Munshi Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2010-10-30 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Fardeen Bhimani; Kelly Johnson; N Patrik Brodin; Wolfgang A Tomé; Jana Fox; Keyur Mehta; Maureen McEvoy; Sheldon Feldman Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2022-07-12 Impact factor: 5.738