Literature DB >> 23142775

The helicase DDX41 recognizes the bacterial secondary messengers cyclic di-GMP and cyclic di-AMP to activate a type I interferon immune response.

Kislay Parvatiyar1, Zhiqiang Zhang, Rosane M Teles, Songying Ouyang, Yan Jiang, Shankar S Iyer, Shivam A Zaver, Mirjam Schenk, Shang Zeng, Wenwan Zhong, Zhi-Jie Liu, Robert L Modlin, Yong-jun Liu, Genhong Cheng.   

Abstract

The induction of type I interferons by the bacterial secondary messengers cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) or cyclic di-AMP (c-di-AMP) is dependent on a signaling axis that involves the adaptor STING, the kinase TBK1 and the transcription factor IRF3. Here we identified the heliase DDX41 as a pattern-recognition receptor (PRR) that sensed both c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP. DDX41 specifically and directly interacted with c-di-GMP. Knockdown of DDX41 via short hairpin RNA in mouse or human cells inhibited the induction of genes encoding molecules involved in the innate immune response and resulted in defective activation of STING, TBK1 and IRF3 in response to c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP. Our results suggest a mechanism whereby c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP are detected by DDX41, which forms a complex with STING to signal to TBK1-IRF3 and activate the interferon response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23142775      PMCID: PMC3501571          DOI: 10.1038/ni.2460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Immunol        ISSN: 1529-2908            Impact factor:   25.606


The host innate immune system provides a critical first line of defense against invading microorganisms including pathogenic bacteria. Utilizing germ-line encoded pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), mammalian cells detect a wide variety of highly invariant molecular structures (known as PAMPs, for pathogen associated molecular patterns) that are often required by microbes for their survival or pathogenicity[1-3]. Indeed, many bacterial pathogens employ cyclic-diguanosine monophosphate (c-di-GMP) or cyclic-diadenosine monophosphate (c-di-AMP), two key secondary messengers that play essential roles in regulating metabolism, motility and virulence [4-6]. During infection with certain bacterial species, these bacterially derived secondary messengers can also act as PAMPs, triggering a host type I interferon (IFN) innate immune response, characterized by the activation of NF-κB and IRF3 transcription factors[7, 8]. The mechanism by which c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP activate the host type I IFN response remains poorly understood. Indeed, intracellular detection of c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP leads to the activation of the type I IFN response in a manner independent of the cytoplasmic PRR RIG-I (also known as DDX58) or its downstream adaptor IPS-1. Moreover, c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP require neither MyD88 nor TRIF adaptors, suggesting that the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family of PRRs also do not play a role in the detection of c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP[9]. The activation of type I IFNs by c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP was however, shown to require STING (aka MITA, MPYS, ERIS or TMEM173), suggesting that these cyclic dinucleotides are detected via a PRR that signals via STING[10, 11]. In response to certain viral nucleic acids and B-DNA, STING functions as an adaptor protein and has been demonstrated to facilitate downstream signal transmission to IRF3 and NF-κB[12-14]. Here, we provide evidence that the recently identified PRR DDX41 is the primary sensor that directly binds to c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP and can trigger the type I IFN host immune response via STING.

RESULTS

DDX41 mediates c-dinucleotide sensing in murine DCs and human monocytes

We stably knocked down DDX41 via short hairpin RNA (shRNA) in the murine splenic dendritic cell line D2SC () and examined IFN-β induction in response to c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP. Control cells infected with L. monocytogenes displayed a robust IFN-β response, whereas DDX41-shRNA cells showed a marked reduction in the IFN-β response (). Consistent with published data[10, 11], STING-shRNA cells also showed impaired IFN-β induction in response to L. monocytogenes (). Cytoplasmic delivery of either c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP via lipofection also yielded strong IFN-β activation which was largely diminished in DDX41-shRNA cells, which paralleled the impairment displayed in STING-shRNA cells (). Induction of IFN-β by the synthetic DNA poly (dA:dT) but not by the RNA ligand poly (I:C) was impaired in DDX41-shRNA cells (), demonstrating the specificity of DDX41 for c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP and B-DNA. Type I IFNs mediate the innate immune response via the IFN-α/β receptor, where receptor ligation leads toward the activation of hundreds of interferon stimulated genes (ISGs)[15]. Both c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP activated the ISG Mx1 in control cells, however, induction of Mx1 was significantly reduced in DDX41-shRNA or STING-shRNA cells (). Similarly, c-di-GMP-mediated activation of other ISGs was also impaired in DDX41-shRNA cells (). These results indicate that DDX41 plays a critical role in c-dinucleotide-mediated activation of type I IFN and IFN-mediated signaling. Cytosolic detection of bacterial secondary messengers also leads to the activation of NF-κB, a key transcription factor important for the induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and TNF[16]. We found that IL-6 and TNF expression levels were significantly reduced in DDX41-shRNA cells compared to control-shRNA cells that were treated with c-di-GMP and/or c-di-AMP ( and ). To determine whether DDX41 mediates c-di-GMP/c-di-AMP sensing and type I IFN activation in human cells, we stably knocked down DDX41 via shRNA in the human monocyte cell line THP-1 (). Consistent with our findings in murine cells, both c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP induced the production of IFN-β in control–shRNA cells, whereas c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP-mediated production of IFN-β was significantly defective in DDX41- or STING-shRNA THP-1 cells (). Induction of ISGs in response to c-di-GMP was also impaired in DDX41-shRNA THP-1 cells (). In addition, the DDX41-STING signaling axis was required for the induction of IFN-β in THP-1 cells stimulated with B-DNA (). These results suggest that DDX41 functions in regulating type I IFN and pro-inflammatory gene inductions in response to c-dinucleotides in both murine and human cells.

DDX41-mediates c-dinucleotide sensing in primary cells

The role of DDX41 in facilitating c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP induced activation of type I IFN in primary cells was also examined. BMDCs (mDCs derived from bone marrow with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)) were prepared and transfected with shRNA targeting DDX41 (). Control-shRNA BMDCs infected with L. monocytogenes displayed robust production of IFN-β, while IFN-β induction in DDX41-shRNA BMDCs was markedly reduced (). c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP stimulation also induced the production of IFN-β in control-shRNA BMDCs, while IFN-β production was highly impaired in DDX41-shRNA BMDCs (). Similarly, primary thioglycollate-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages transfected with siRNA targeting DDX41 () displayed reduced activation of IFN-β in response to L. monocytogenes infection or c-di-GMP stimulation compared to control-siRNA transfected cells (). Consistently, induction of Mx1 and IL-6 were also impaired in DDX41-siRNA peritoneal macrophages infected with L. monocytogenes or treated with c-di-GMP (). To determine whether DDX41 plays a role in sensing c-di-GMP in primary human cells, we transfected peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with an siRNA specific for DDX41 (). While control-siRNA PBMCs infected with L. monocytogenes or treated with c-di-GMP elicited the activation of IFN-β, DDX41-siRNA PBMCs showed defective IFN-β activation in response to L. monocytogenes or c-di-GMP (). Similar reductions in IFN-β activation were displayed in DDX41-siRNA PBMCs obtained from two additional human donors (). These results further indicate a critical role for DDX41 in facilitating type I IFN responses induced by c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP in primary immune cells.

DDX41 is a direct sensor of c-di-GMP

DDX41 is known not only to signal via the STING adaptor to activate type I IFN, but to also function as a PRR that directly binds viral DNA and B-DNA[17]. We therefore investigated whether DDX41 functioned as a direct sensor (PRR) for c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP. Biotin-labeled c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP pulled down ectopically expressed DDX41 from 293T cell lysates ( and ). Immunofluorescence microscopy further revealed that DDX41 and c-di-GMP co-localized upon their co-transfection into D2SC cells (). In addition, we found that GST-purified DDX41 or His-purified DDX41 from E.coli directly bound c-di-GMP ( and ). The c-di-GMP interaction with DDX41 was specific as only unlabeled c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP and poly (dA:dT) (B-DNA), but not poly (I:C), could competitively disrupt the c-di-GMP-DDX41 interaction (). Furthermore, the structurally similar molecules GMP and AMP, but not the c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP precursors, GTP or ATP, also disrupted the DDX41-c-di-GMP complex (). To determine whether c-di-GMP binding was specific to the DDX41 helicase, we compared c-di-GMP binding with another DEAD box helicase PRR. c-di-GMP bound to DDX41, but showed no interaction with DDX58 (). To define which domain of DDX41 was important for binding c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP, we used a series of deletion mutants of DDX41 () and evaluated their interactions with biotinylated c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP in 293T cells. c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP failed to interact with DDX41 lacking the central DEAD box domain (). To determine the physiological relevance of this domain in terms of type I IFN induction, we reconstituted DDX41-shRNA THP-1 cells with either full length DDX41 or the DDX41 deletion mutant lacking the DEAD box domain (). As expected, DDX41-shRNA cells displayed defective IFN-β production in response to c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP compared to control-shRNA cells (). However, DDX41-shRNA cells reconstituted with full length DDX41, but not the DDX41 deletion mutant lacking the DEAD box domain, “rescued” the defective IFN-β production in DDX41-shRNA cells in response to c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP stimulation (). Thus c-dinucleotide mediated induction of IFN-β requires the central DEAD box domain of DDX41.

DDX41-dependent signaling downstream of c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP

DDX41 interacts and co-localizes with the STING adaptor () to facilitate DNA ligand dependent signal transduction[17]. Introduction of either c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP into D2SC cells led to enhanced DDX41-STING complex formation (). In DNA dependent signaling pathways, STING further binds to the downstream kinase TBK1 to activate the type I IFN response[18, 19]. Both c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP when transfected into control D2SC cells activated the formation of a STING-TBK1 complex, however, c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP mediated activation of the STING-TBK1 complex was almost completely abrogated in DDX41-shRNA cells (). Consequently, c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP mediated activation of TBK1, IRF3 and the downstream type I IFN effector, STAT1 was impaired in DDX41-shRNA cells (). Activation of NF-κB was also impaired in DDX41-shRNA cells in response to either c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP (). Together, our findings suggest that DDX41 is a critical PRR for c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP mediated IFN induction, and that its absence generates a defect in downstream STING-dependent signaling.

c-di-GMP signals to the STING adaptor via DDX41

A recent study found that c-di-GMP could bind to the C-terminal domain of STING (STING CTD) and suggested that the STING adaptor could function as an immune sensor of c-di-GMP[20]. We therefore performed binding assays to determine the affinities of c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP for DDX41 and for STING in parallel. Biotin-labeled c-di-GMP pulled down ectopically expressed DDX41 with greater affinity over ectopically expressed STING from 293T cell lysates (). Physiologically, binding of c-di-GMP with endogenous DDX41 was also greater than the association between c-di-GMP and endogenous STING (). Immunofluorescence imaging further revealed greater co-localization between c-di-GMP and DDX41 in comparison to STING (34.13% vs 6.25%) (). Affinity capillary electrophoresis (ACE) experiments were also performed to examine the binding affinities between c-di-GMP and recombinant DDX41 or recombinant STING CTD. c-di-GMP bound DDX41 with a Kd of ~5.65 μM, whereas c-di-GMP associated with STING CTD with a Kd of ~14.54 μM (). Consistent with these findings, c-di-GMP bound to purified recombinant DDX41 with stronger affinity than purified recombinant STING CTD in pulldown binding assays (). We therefore hypothesized that DDX41 is the major primary sensor of c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP, operating upstream of STING, and upon binding these PAMPs, yields enhanced complex formation with STING to facilitate downstream signaling and type I IFN activation (). Accordingly, c-di-GMP was significantly impaired in its capacity to associate with ectopically expressed STING in 293T cells transfected with siRNA targeting DDX41 (). Consistently, co-localization between c-di-GMP and STING was largely reduced in DDX41-shRNA cells, whereas c-di-GMP-DDX41 interactions remained intact in STING-shRNA cells (). Taken together, our findings indicate that DDX41 is the primary PRR for c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP, which signals via STING for type I IFN induction.

DISCUSSION

Many bacterial pathogens including Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, Yersiniae, Listeria and Mycobacterial species employ key secondary messengers including c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP that play essential modulatory roles in bacteria[4, 7]. Although several substrates and effectors have been identified for these cyclic dinucleotide monophosphate species within the bacterial cell, our understanding of these bacteria-specific secondary messengers on the innate immune response within the mammalian host cell is just beginning to emerge. c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP activate the host type I IFN response in a manner dependent on the STING adaptor[10, 11] and our findings indicate that the DNA sensor helicase DDX41 functions as a direct PRR for these cyclic dinucleotides in both murine and human cells. Our results showed that unlabeled c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP could disrupt the DDX41-c-di-GMP interaction. We found that GMP and AMP, but not the bulkier GTP or ATP molecules, could also competitively disrupt the DDX41-c-di-GMP complex. Although two molecules of GMP or AMP are structurally similar to c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP, respectively, they are not known to function as PAMPs in mammalian cells[9]. It will therefore be of further interest to determine how these species play a modulatory role in the type I IFN response. Our competition experiments additionally revealed that B-DNA could disrupt the DDX41-c-di-GMP complex. Indeed DDX41 has been shown to function as a sensor for B-DNA as well[17]. The mechanism by which DDX41 binds B-DNA, as well as cyclic dinucleotides, as revealed by co-crystallization studies and point mutation analysis will be the subject of future investigation. Our results additionally indicated that c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP mediated activation of innate signaling and type I IFN induction were similarly defective between cells in which DDX41 or STING had been knocked down , suggesting DDX41 and STING share a common signaling pathway. STING-deficient cells displayed a very modest defect in NF-κB activation in response to c-di-GMP or c-di-AMP. The reason for this phenomenon is not entirely clear[10], however it may be possible that there is redundancy or compensation in signaling to NF-κB. Another DNA sensor, IFI16 (also known as p204) was also shown to facilitate some viral DNA triggered signaling via the STING adaptor[21, 22]. Although a role for IFI16 cannot be ruled out in the c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP signaling pathway, it is however unlikely that IFI16 functions as a primary sensor for these molecules since its’ basal expression is low and is rather induced in a type I IFN-dependent manner. DDX41 expression on the other hand, is greater at the basal state and is not modulated by type I IFNs[17]. Our data suggests that DDX41 serves as the PRR for c-di-GMP and c-di-AMP, which upon receptor binding signals to TBK1-IRF3 via the STING adaptor. Lending further credibility as a scaffolding molecule, STING was recently shown to bridge TBK1-IRF3 interactions for optimal signaling[23]. Nevertheless, consistent with a published report[20], we also found that c-di-GMP associated with STING, however, with lower affinity than DDX41. Although the physiological relevance of this interaction requires further investigation, our data shows that c-di-GMP interaction with STING is significantly enhanced in the presence of DDX41 in cells. The solved structure of the C-terminal domain of STING in complex with c-di-GMP revealed that one molecule of c-di-GMP binds one dimer of STING[24-28]. We propose that c-di-GMP detection and binding to DDX41 promotes enhanced DDX41-STING interactions leading to an increase in binding affinity of STING toward c-di-GMP, ultimately driving downstream signaling events. Thus, STING may function as a secondary receptor or co-factor in the cyclic dinucleotide signaling pathway. The significance of type I IFN induction in the context of anti-bacterial innate immunity is currently unclear and somewhat controversial, particularly due to conflicting reports on whether type I IFN either functions to support or inhibit bacterial growth[29-32]. It will therefore be of interest to further study how different bacteria and host cells use secondary messengers and DDX41 as virulence factors and innate immune receptors, respectively, in their battle of infection and immunity[33-35]. As such, cyclic dinucleotide species and DDX41 represent new targets such that modulation of their interaction during certain bacterial infections can alter the host immune response in a manner to suppress bacterial replication and spread.

METHODS

Methods and any associated references are available in the online version of the paper at http://www.nature.com/natureimmunology/.
  35 in total

Review 1.  The role of toll-like receptors in macrophages.

Authors:  Claire E McCoy; Luke A J O'Neill
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2008-01-01

Review 2.  Pathogen subversion of cell-intrinsic innate immunity.

Authors:  Craig R Roy; Edward S Mocarski
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 3.  Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response.

Authors:  Ruslan Medzhitov
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Host innate immune receptors and beyond: making sense of microbial infections.

Authors:  Ken J Ishii; Shohei Koyama; Atsushi Nakagawa; Cevayir Coban; Shizuo Akira
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 21.023

5.  The adaptor protein MITA links virus-sensing receptors to IRF3 transcription factor activation.

Authors:  Bo Zhong; Yan Yang; Shu Li; Yan-Yi Wang; Ying Li; Feici Diao; Caoqi Lei; Xiao He; Lu Zhang; Po Tien; Hong-Bing Shu
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 31.745

6.  Sensing adenovirus infection: activation of interferon regulatory factor 3 in RAW 264.7 cells.

Authors:  Saskia C Stein; Erik Falck-Pedersen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 7.  Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria.

Authors:  Regine Hengge
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 8.  Bacterial nucleotide-based second messengers.

Authors:  Christina Pesavento; Regine Hengge
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 7.934

9.  STING is an endoplasmic reticulum adaptor that facilitates innate immune signalling.

Authors:  Hiroki Ishikawa; Glen N Barber
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Mice lacking the type I interferon receptor are resistant to Listeria monocytogenes.

Authors:  Victoria Auerbuch; Dirk G Brockstedt; Nicole Meyer-Morse; Mary O'Riordan; Daniel A Portnoy
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2004-08-09       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  186 in total

1.  Nuclease-Resistant c-di-AMP Derivatives That Differentially Recognize RNA and Protein Receptors.

Authors:  Robert E Meehan; Chad D Torgerson; Barbara L Gaffney; Roger A Jones; Scott A Strobel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 2.  Cyclic dinucleotides and the innate immune response.

Authors:  Olga Danilchanka; John J Mekalanos
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Newly described pattern recognition receptors team up against intracellular pathogens.

Authors:  Petr Broz; Denise M Monack
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  Cyclic-di-GMP and cyclic-di-AMP activate the NLRP3 inflammasome.

Authors:  Ali A Abdul-Sater; Ivan Tattoli; Lei Jin; Andrzej Grajkowski; Assaf Levi; Beverly H Koller; Irving C Allen; Serge L Beaucage; Katherine A Fitzgerald; Jenny P-Y Ting; John C Cambier; Stephen E Girardin; Christian Schindler
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  IRF5 distinguishes severe asthma in humans and drives Th1 phenotype and airway hyperreactivity in mice.

Authors:  Timothy B Oriss; Mahesh Raundhal; Christina Morse; Rachael E Huff; Sudipta Das; Rachel Hannum; Marc C Gauthier; Kathryn L Scholl; Krishnendu Chakraborty; Seyed M Nouraie; Sally E Wenzel; Prabir Ray; Anuradha Ray
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2017-05-18

Review 6.  Mechanisms of Immune Tolerance in Leukemia and Lymphoma.

Authors:  Emily K Curran; James Godfrey; Justin Kline
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 16.687

Review 7.  Innate antiviral immune signaling, viral evasion and modulation by HIV-1.

Authors:  Arjun Rustagi; Michael Gale
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Mouse, but not human STING, binds and signals in response to the vascular disrupting agent 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid.

Authors:  Joseph Conlon; Dara L Burdette; Shruti Sharma; Numana Bhat; Mikayla Thompson; Zhaozhao Jiang; Vijay A K Rathinam; Brian Monks; Tengchuan Jin; T Sam Xiao; Stefanie N Vogel; Russell E Vance; Katherine A Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Deletion of the cyclic di-AMP phosphodiesterase gene (cnpB) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis leads to reduced virulence in a mouse model of infection.

Authors:  Jun Yang; Yinlan Bai; Yang Zhang; Vincent D Gabrielle; Lei Jin; Guangchun Bai
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  Cyclic di-AMP, a second messenger of primary importance: tertiary structures and binding mechanisms.

Authors:  Jin He; Wen Yin; Michael Y Galperin; Shan-Ho Chou
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.