PURPOSE: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress. RESULTS: The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.8-82.5), 99.5% specificity (95% CI 98.0-100.0), 99.3% positive predictive value (95% CI 98.7-100.0) and 67.9% negative predictive value (95% CI 64.2-73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95% CI 19-21 vs 6, 95% CI 6-7, p <0.0001). Logistic regression adjusted and unadjusted by propensity score indicated that women in the premature ejaculation group had a 7.12 (95% CI 5.98-10.14, p <0.0001) to 9.83 (95% CI 7.94-12.15) greater probability of sexual distress than controls. CONCLUSIONS: The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire fulfills psychometric requirements for measuring sexual distress related to partner sexual dysfunction.
PURPOSE: We measured premature ejaculation related female sexual distress using a new diagnostic tool, the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this large-scale, Internet based population study we evaluated 2,109 women in a stable relationship during the last 6 months. The 1,361 women in the premature ejaculation group had no female sexual disorder but the partner had premature ejaculation alone. The 748 controls had no female sexual disorder and a partner without premature ejaculation. We determined questionnaire content and discriminant validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Multivariate logistic regression with propensity score reweighting was done to determine the clinical impact of demographics on the perception of sexual distress. RESULTS: The questionnaire was well understood. Internal consistency was greater than 0.90 and 0.84 in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. Test-retest reliability was 0.82 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79-0.92) in the premature ejaculation and control groups, respectively. The questionnaire had a high AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.89-0.91). The new cutoff score of 12 or greater had 79.1% sensitivity (95% CI 73.8-82.5), 99.5% specificity (95% CI 98.0-100.0), 99.3% positive predictive value (95% CI 98.7-100.0) and 67.9% negative predictive value (95% CI 64.2-73.2). Median questionnaire scores were significantly higher in the premature ejaculation group than in controls (20, 95% CI 19-21 vs 6, 95% CI 6-7, p <0.0001). Logistic regression adjusted and unadjusted by propensity score indicated that women in the premature ejaculation group had a 7.12 (95% CI 5.98-10.14, p <0.0001) to 9.83 (95% CI 7.94-12.15) greater probability of sexual distress than controls. CONCLUSIONS: The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised-Premature Ejaculation questionnaire fulfills psychometric requirements for measuring sexual distress related to partner sexual dysfunction.
Authors: G Ciocca; E Limoncin; D Mollaioli; G L Gravina; E Carosa; S Di Sante; D Gianfrilli; F Lombardo; A Lenzi; E A Jannini Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Arik Shechter; E C Serefoglu; Tal Gollan; Shmuel Springer; Gideon Meiry; Boaz Appel; Ilan Gruenwald Journal: Int J Impot Res Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.896
Authors: A Sansone; A Aversa; G Corona; A D Fisher; A M Isidori; S La Vignera; E Limoncin; M Maggi; M Merico; E A Jannini Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 4.256