Literature DB >> 23142603

Normal values of pharyngeal and esophageal 24-hour pH impedance in individuals on and off therapy and interobserver reproducibility.

Frank Zerbib1, Sabine Roman, Stanislas Bruley Des Varannes, Guillaume Gourcerol, Benoît Coffin, Alain Ropert, Patricia Lepicard, François Mion.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Combined pH and impedance monitoring can detect all types of reflux episodes within the esophageal lumen and the pharynx. We performed a multicenter study to establish normal values of pharyngeal and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in individuals on and off therapy and to determine the interobserver reproducibility of this technique.
METHODS: We collected ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance recordings from 46 healthy subjects by using a bifurcated probe that allowed for detection of reflux events in the distal and proximal esophagus and pharynx. Data were collected when subjects had not received any medicine (off therapy) and after receiving 40 mg esomeprazole twice daily for 14 days (on therapy). The interobserver agreement for the detection of reflux events was determined in 20 subjects off and on therapy. Results were expressed as median (interquartile range).
RESULTS: Off therapy, subjects had a median of 32 reflux events (17-45) in the distal esophagus and 3 (1-6) in the proximal esophagus; they had none in the pharynx. On therapy, subjects had a median number of 21 reflux events (6-37) in the distal esophagus and 2 (0-5) in the proximal esophagus; again, there were none in the pharynx. Interobserver agreement was good for esophageal reflux events but poor for pharyngeal events.
CONCLUSIONS: We determined normal values of pharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux events by 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring of subjects receiving or not receiving esomeprazole therapy. Analyses of esophageal events were reproducible, but analyses of pharyngeal events were not; this limitation should be taken into account in further studies.
Copyright © 2013 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23142603     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  40 in total

1.  Scintigraphy in laryngopharyngeal and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a definitive diagnostic test?

Authors:  Gregory L Falk; John Beattie; Alvin Ing; S E Falk; Michael Magee; Leticia Burton; Hans Van der Wall
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Hypopharyngeal pepsin and Sep70 as diagnostic markers of laryngopharyngeal reflux: preliminary study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Komatsu; Lori A Kelly; Ali H Zaidi; Christina L Rotoloni; Juliann E Kosovec; Emily J Lloyd; Amina Waheed; Toshitaka Hoppo; Blair A Jobe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The importance of subgrouping refractory NERD patients according to esophageal pH-impedance testing.

Authors:  Edoardo Savarino; Maria Giacchino; Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Mucosal Impedance: a New Approach to Diagnosing Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Caroline Barrett; Yash Choksi; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2018-06-09

5.  "Normal Values of 24H Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance pH-Metry in a Greek Obese Population Based on Montreal Definition of Gerd".

Authors:  Georgia Doulami; Stamatina Triantafyllou; Maria Natoudi; Konstantinos Albanopoulos; Evangelos Menenakos; Konstantinos Filis; Georgios Zografos; Dimitrios Theodorou
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Martin Duricek; Peter Banovcin; Tatiana Halickova; Rudolf Hyrdel; Marian Kollarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Impairment of chemical clearance and mucosal integrity distinguishes hypersensitive esophagus from functional heartburn.

Authors:  Marzio Frazzoni; Nicola de Bortoli; Leonardo Frazzoni; Manuele Furnari; Irene Martinucci; Salvatore Tolone; Andrea Farioli; Santino Marchi; Lorenzo Fuccio; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Pharyngeal pH alone is not reliable for the detection of pharyngeal reflux events: A study with oesophageal and pharyngeal pH-impedance monitoring.

Authors:  Marie Desjardin; Sabine Roman; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes; Guillaume Gourcerol; Benoit Coffin; Alain Ropert; François Mion; Frank Zerbib
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Gastroesophageal reflux in asymptomatic obese subjects: An esophageal impedance-pH study.

Authors:  Filiz Akyüz; Ahmet Uyanıkoglu; Fatih Ermis; Serpil Arıcı; Ümit Akyüz; Bülent Baran; Binnur Pinarbasi; Nurdan Gul
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Early referral for esophageal pH monitoring is more cost-effective than prolonged empiric trials of proton-pump inhibitors for suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  David A Kleiman; Toni Beninato; Brian P Bosworth; Laurent Brunaud; Thomas Ciecierega; Carl V Crawford; Brian G Turner; Thomas J Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.