Literature DB >> 23142456

Variations in surgeons' recovery expectations for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty: a survey of the AAHKS membership.

Christopher J Dy1, Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle, Sally York, Jose A Rodriguez, Thomas P Sculco, Hassan M K Ghomrawi.   

Abstract

Recovery expectations (RE) after total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA-TKA) influence outcomes. We surveyed AAHKS members to determine variation in surgeon RE. Four vignettes depicting patients with high and low expectations after THA and TKA were distributed with a validated RE survey. Responses were analyzed for clinically significant differences between surgeons and within surgeons. Of 1049 surgeons surveyed, 358 (34%) responded. There was a clinically significant difference in 85% (high-THA), 46% (low-THA), 74% (high-TKA), and 57% (low-TKA) of pairs. Disagreement was significantly greater in high expectation vignettes. Individual surgeons distinguished between high and low expectation patients in 76% (THA) and 72% (TKA) of cases. There was no association between surgeon RE and practice demographics. Wide variations in RE were observed, especially among high expectation patients.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23142456     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

Review 1.  Challenges in outcome measurement: discrepancies between patient and provider definitions of success.

Authors:  Philip C Noble; Sophie Fuller-Lafreniere; Morteza Meftah; Maureen K Dwyer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Do Surgeon Expectations Predict Clinically Important Improvements in WOMAC Scores After THA and TKA?

Authors:  Hassan M K Ghomrawi; Carol A Mancuso; Allison Dunning; Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle; Michael Alexiades; Charles Cornell; Thomas Sculco; Matthias Bostrom; David Mayman; Robert G Marx; Geoffrey Westrich; Michael O'Dell; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison of different rating scales for the use in Delphi studies: different scales lead to different consensus and show different test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Toni Lange; Christian Kopkow; Jörg Lützner; Klaus-Peter Günther; Sascha Gravius; Hanns-Peter Scharf; Johannes Stöve; Richard Wagner; Jochen Schmitt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.615

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.