BACKGROUND: The impact of anti-vector immunity on the elicitation of insert-specific immune responses is important to understand in vaccine development. HVTN 055 was a 150 person phase I randomized, controlled HIV vaccine trial of recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (rMVA) and fowlpox (rFPV) with matched HIV-1 inserts which demonstrated increased CD8+ T-cell immune responses in the heterologous vaccine group. The controls used in this study were the empty vectors (MVA and FPV). METHODS:Anti-MVA and anti-vaccinia neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were measured and compared with cellular and humoral HIV-1-specific immune responses. RESULTS:Elicitation of anti-vector responses increased with increasing dose of MVA and up to 2 administrations. Further inoculations of MVA (up to 5) did not increase the magnitude of the anti-MVA response but did delay the anti-vector NAb titre decay. There was no evidence that the insert impaired the anti-vector response, nor that anti-vector immunity attenuated the insert-specific responses. CONCLUSION: Two doses of MVA may be ideal for the elicitation of orthopoxvirus immune responses with further doses maintaining increased titres against the vector. We found no evidence that eliciting HIV insert- or MVA vector-specific immune responses interfered with elicitation of immune responses to the other.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The impact of anti-vector immunity on the elicitation of insert-specific immune responses is important to understand in vaccine development. HVTN 055 was a 150 person phase I randomized, controlled HIV vaccine trial of recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (rMVA) and fowlpox (rFPV) with matched HIV-1 inserts which demonstrated increased CD8+ T-cell immune responses in the heterologous vaccine group. The controls used in this study were the empty vectors (MVA and FPV). METHODS: Anti-MVA and anti-vaccinia neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) were measured and compared with cellular and humoral HIV-1-specific immune responses. RESULTS: Elicitation of anti-vector responses increased with increasing dose of MVA and up to 2 administrations. Further inoculations of MVA (up to 5) did not increase the magnitude of the anti-MVA response but did delay the anti-vector NAb titre decay. There was no evidence that the insert impaired the anti-vector response, nor that anti-vector immunity attenuated the insert-specific responses. CONCLUSION: Two doses of MVA may be ideal for the elicitation of orthopoxvirus immune responses with further doses maintaining increased titres against the vector. We found no evidence that eliciting HIV insert- or MVA vector-specific immune responses interfered with elicitation of immune responses to the other.
Authors: Janie Parrino; Lewis H McCurdy; Brenda D Larkin; Ingelise J Gordon; Steven E Rucker; Mary E Enama; Richard A Koup; Mario Roederer; Robert T Bailer; Zoe Moodie; Lin Gu; Lihan Yan; Barney S Graham Journal: Vaccine Date: 2006-11-07 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Sampa Santra; Yue Sun; Jenny G Parvani; Valerie Philippon; Michael S Wyand; Kelledy Manson; Alicia Gomez-Yafal; Gail Mazzara; Dennis Panicali; Phillip D Markham; David C Montefiori; Norman L Letvin Journal: J Virol Date: 2007-06-06 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Helen Horton; Evan P Thomas; Jason A Stucky; Ian Frank; Zoe Moodie; Yunda Huang; Ya-Lin Chiu; M Juliana McElrath; Stephen C De Rosa Journal: J Immunol Methods Date: 2007-04-03 Impact factor: 2.303
Authors: Fusheng Li; Uma Malhotra; Peter B Gilbert; Natalie R Hawkins; Ann C Duerr; Juliana M McElrath; Lawrence Corey; Steven G Self Journal: Vaccine Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Paul A Goepfert; Georgia D Tomaras; Helen Horton; David Montefiori; Guido Ferrari; Mark Deers; Gerald Voss; Marguerite Koutsoukos; Louise Pedneault; Pierre Vandepapeliere; M Juliana McElrath; Paul Spearman; Jonathan D Fuchs; Beryl A Koblin; William A Blattner; Sharon Frey; Lindsey R Baden; Clayton Harro; Thomas Evans Journal: Vaccine Date: 2006-08-10 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Caroline L Smith; P Rod Dunbar; Fareed Mirza; Michael J Palmowski; Dawn Shepherd; Sarah C Gilbert; Pierre Coulie; Joerg Schneider; Eric Hoffman; Robert Hawkins; Adrian L Harris; Vincenzo Cerundolo Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2005-01-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Sharon E Frey; Frances K Newman; Jeffrey S Kennedy; Vera Sobek; Francis A Ennis; Heather Hill; Lihan K Yan; Paul Chaplin; Jens Vollmar; Bernard R Chaitman; Robert B Belshe Journal: Vaccine Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Lauren E Grandpre; Jonathan S Duke-Cohan; Bonnie A Ewald; Colleen Devoy; Dan H Barouch; Norman L Letvin; Ellis L Reinherz; Lindsey R Baden; Raphael Dolin; Michael S Seaman Journal: Vaccine Date: 2009-01-23 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Stephen R Walsh; Marissa B Wilck; David J Dominguez; Elise Zablowsky; Shringkhala Bajimaya; Lisa S Gagne; Kelly A Verrill; Jane A Kleinjan; Alka Patel; Ying Zhang; Heather Hill; Aruna Acharyya; David C Fisher; Joseph H Antin; Michael S Seaman; Raphael Dolin; Lindsey R Baden Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Felix Wussow; Flavia Chiuppesi; Joy Martinez; John Campo; Erica Johnson; Christin Flechsig; Maegan Newell; Elaine Tran; Jose Ortiz; Corinna La Rosa; Andreas Herrmann; Jeff Longmate; Rana Chakraborty; Peter A Barry; Don J Diamond Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 6.823
Authors: Henning Lauterbach; Juliane Pätzold; Ronny Kassub; Barbara Bathke; Kay Brinkmann; Paul Chaplin; Mark Suter; Hubertus Hochrein Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2013-08-27 Impact factor: 7.561