Literature DB >> 23142049

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in partial tear: selective anteromedial bundle reconstruction conserving the posterolateral remnant versus single-bundle anatomic ACL reconstruction: preliminary 1-year results of a prospective randomized study.

N Pujol1, P Colombet, J-F Potel, T Cucurulo, N Graveleau, C Hulet, J-C Panisset, E Servien, B Sonnery-Cottet, C Trojani, P Djian.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) are frequent. Conserving ACL remnants is central to the concept of anatomic, biomechanical and biological reconstruction. The interest of such conservation remains theoretical. The present hypothesis was that selective anteromedial (AM) bundle reconstruction is preferable to the standard single-bundle reconstruction in partial ACL tear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized study recruited 54 partial ACL tears operated on either by selective AM bundle reconstruction (Group 1, n=29) or by standard anatomic single-bundle reconstruction (Group 2, n=25). All patients were clinically assessed on subjective and objective IKDC, Lysholm and KOOS scores, with a minimum 12 months' follow-up. Comparative pre- to postoperative anterior laxity was measured on the Rolimeter(®) device, with statistical analysis of results.
RESULTS: There were no significant preoperative differences between the two groups. All patients were followed-up at 6 months and 1 year. Mean subjective IKDC scores for groups 1 and 2 respectively were 55.8 and 56.8 preoperatively versus 86.2 and 85.7 at 1 year; Lysholm scores were 69.9 and 71.1 versus 90.9 and 91.8. These inter-group differences were non-significant. Differential laxity for groups 1 and 2 respectively was 5.0mm (range, 2-10) and 5.1mm (2-12) preoperatively (P=0.73), versus 1.2mm and 1.9 mm postoperatively (P=0.03). DISCUSSION AND
CONCLUSION: In partial ACL tear, selective AM bundle reconstruction conserving the posterolateral bundle remnant provides clinical results comparable to the standard single-bundle technique, with better control of anterior laxity. Longer follow-up, however, will be needed to compare evolution in anterior and rotational laxity and in subjective results over time.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23142049     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  20 in total

1.  Can the gracilis replace the anterior cruciate ligament in the knee? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Etienne Cavaignac; Regis Pailhé; Nicolas Reina; Jérôme Murgier; Jean Michel Laffosse; Philippe Chiron; Pascal Swider
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Comparison of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and single-bundle reconstruction with remnant pull-out suture.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Young Bok Jung; Min Ku Song; Sang Hak Lee; Ho Joong Jung; Han Jun Lee; Hyoung Seok Jung; Hawa-Tahir Siti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Clinical outcomes of remnant preserving augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jianzhong Hu; Jin Qu; Daqi Xu; Tao Zhang; Jingyong Zhou; Hongbin Lu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical outcomes and biomechanical analysis of posterolateral bundle augmentation in patients with partial anterior cruciate ligament tears.

Authors:  Takehiko Matsushita; Ryosuke Kuroda; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Daisuke Araki; Yuichi Hoshino; Kanto Nagai; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Surgical treatment of partial anterior cruciate ligament lesions: medium-term results.

Authors:  Massimo Berruto; Luca Gala; Paolo Ferrua; Francesco Uboldi; Fabrizio Ferrara; Stefano Pasqualotto; Bruno M Marelli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2015-02-13

6.  Updates in biological therapies for knee injuries: anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Franciozi; Sheila Jean McNeill Ingham; Guilherme Conforto Gracitelli; Marcus Vinicius Malheiros Luzo; Freddie H Fu; Rene Jorge Abdalla
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-09

7.  Single-Bundle Augmentation for a Partial Tear of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  Allison J Rao; Gregory L Cvetanovich; William A Zuke; Beatrice Go; Brian Forsythe
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-06-26

8.  Predictive factors for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via the trans-tibial technique.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Yong-Beom Park; Dong-Hyun Kim; Nicolas Pujol; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 9.  Selective bundle versus complete anterior-cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark Hx Yeo; Shawn Js Seah; Cheryl Gatot; Andy Yew; Denny Lie
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-31

10.  Remnant preserving ACL reconstruction with a functional remnant is related to improved laxity but not to improved clinical outcomes in comparison to a nonfunctional remnant.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Franciozi; Flávio Kazuo Minami; Luiz Felipe Ambra; Pedro Henrique Schmidt Alves Ferreira Galvão; Felipe Conrado Schumacher; Marcelo Seiji Kubota
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.