Literature DB >> 23142043

Sumatran orangutans differ in their cultural knowledge but not in their cognitive abilities.

Thibaud Gruber1, Ian Singleton, Carel van Schaik.   

Abstract

Animal cultures are controversial because the method used to isolate culture in animals aims at excluding genetic and environmental influences rather than demonstrating social learning. Here, we analyzed these factors in parallel in captivity to determine their influences on tool use. We exposed Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii) orphans from tool-using and non-tool-using regions (western swamps and eastern Langkat, respectively) that differed in both genetic and cultural backgrounds to a raking task and a honey-dipping task to assess their understanding of stick use. Orangutans from both regions were equally successful in raking; however, swamp orangutans were more successful than Langkat orangutans in honey dipping, where previously acquired knowledge was required. A larger analysis suggested that the Alas River could constitute a geographical barrier to the spread of this cultural trait. Finally, honey-dipping individuals were on average less than 4 years old, but this behavior is not observed in the wild before 6 years of age. Our results suggest first that genetic differences between wild Sumatran populations cannot explain their differences in stick use; however, their performances in honey dipping support a cultural differentiation in stick knowledge. Second, the results suggest that the honey-dippers were too young when arriving at the quarantine center to have possibly mastered the behavior in the wild individually, suggesting that they arrived with preestablished mental representations of stick use or, simply put, "cultural ideas."
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23142043     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  9 in total

1.  Wild chimpanzees select tool material based on efficiency and knowledge.

Authors:  Noemie Lamon; Christof Neumann; Jennifer Gier; Klaus Zuberbühler; Thibaud Gruber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Apes have culture but may not know that they do.

Authors:  Thibaud Gruber; Klaus Zuberbühler; Fabrice Clément; Carel van Schaik
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-06

3.  The spread of a novel behavior in wild chimpanzees: New insights into the ape cultural mind.

Authors:  Thibaud Gruber; Timothée Poisot; Klaus Zuberbühler; William Hoppitt; Catherine Hobaiter
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Social network analysis shows direct evidence for social transmission of tool use in wild chimpanzees.

Authors:  Catherine Hobaiter; Timothée Poisot; Klaus Zuberbühler; William Hoppitt; Thibaud Gruber
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 8.029

5.  Cultural and Species Differences in Gazing Patterns for Marked and Decorated Objects: A Comparative Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Cordelia Mühlenbeck; Thomas Jacobsen; Carla Pritsch; Katja Liebal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-01-23

6.  An Orangutan Hangs Up a Tool for Future Use.

Authors:  Nicholas J Mulcahy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Uncovering the cultural knowledge of sanctuary apes.

Authors:  Thibaud Gruber
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2013-05-13

8.  Travel fosters tool use in wild chimpanzees.

Authors:  Thibaud Gruber; Klaus Zuberbühler; Christof Neumann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Cognitive differences between orang-utan species: a test of the cultural intelligence hypothesis.

Authors:  Sofia I F Forss; Erik Willems; Josep Call; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.