Literature DB >> 23142037

When it takes a bad person to do the right thing.

Eric Luis Uhlmann1, Luke Lei Zhu, David Tannenbaum.   

Abstract

Three studies demonstrate that morally praiseworthy behavior can signal negative information about an agent's character. In particular, consequentialist decisions such as sacrificing one life to save an even greater number of lives can lead to unfavorable character evaluations, even when they are viewed as the preferred course of action. In Study 1, throwing a dying man overboard to prevent a lifeboat from sinking was perceived as the morally correct course of action, but led to negative aspersions about the motivations and personal character of individuals who carried out such an act. In Studies 2 and 3, a hospital administrator who decided not to fund an expensive operation to save a child (instead buying needed hospital equipment) was seen as making a pragmatic and morally praiseworthy decision, but also as deficient in empathy and moral character.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23142037     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  9 in total

1.  Fraud and Understanding the Moral Mind: Need for Implementation of Organizational Characteristics into Behavioral Ethics.

Authors:  Petr Houdek
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Bright mind, moral mind? Intelligence is unrelated to consequentialist moral judgment in sacrificial moral dilemmas.

Authors:  D H Bostyn; J De Keersmaecker; J Van Assche; A Roets
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

3.  Individual variation in role construal predicts responses to third-party biases in hiring contexts.

Authors:  Andrea C Vial; Janine Bosak; Patrick C Flood; John F Dovidio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects.

Authors:  Andrea C Vial; Colleen M Cowgill
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-08-29

5.  Moral dilemmas and trust in leaders during a global health crisis.

Authors:  Jim A C Everett; Clara Colombatto; Edmond Awad; Paulo Boggio; Björn Bos; William J Brady; Megha Chawla; Vladimir Chituc; Dongil Chung; Moritz A Drupp; Srishti Goel; Brit Grosskopf; Frederik Hjorth; Alissa Ji; Caleb Kealoha; Judy S Kim; Yangfei Lin; Yina Ma; Michel André Maréchal; Federico Mancinelli; Christoph Mathys; Asmus L Olsen; Graeme Pearce; Annayah M B Prosser; Niv Reggev; Nicholas Sabin; Julien Senn; Yeon Soon Shin; Walter Sinnott-Armstrong; Hallgeir Sjåstad; Madelijn Strick; Sunhae Sul; Lars Tummers; Monique Turner; Hongbo Yu; Yoonseo Zoh; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-07-01

6.  Social Representations of Hero and Everyday Hero: A Network Study from Representative Samples.

Authors:  Zsolt Keczer; Bálint File; Gábor Orosz; Philip G Zimbardo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The costs of being consequentialist: Social inference from instrumental harm and impartial beneficence.

Authors:  Jim A C Everett; Nadira S Faber; Julian Savulescu; Molly J Crockett
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-11

8.  People making deontological judgments in the Trapdoor dilemma are perceived to be more prosocial in economic games than they actually are.

Authors:  Valerio Capraro; Jonathan Sippel; Bonan Zhao; Levin Hornischer; Morgan Savary; Zoi Terzopoulou; Pierre Faucher; Simone F Griffioen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The amoral atheist? A cross-national examination of cultural, motivational, and cognitive antecedents of disbelief, and their implications for morality.

Authors:  Tomas Ståhl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.