Literature DB >> 23141834

Performance of dairy cows fed high levels of acetic acid or ethanol.

J L P Daniel1, R C Amaral, A Sá Neto, E H Cabezas-Garcia, A W Bispo, M Zopollatto, T L Cardoso, M H F Spoto, F A P Santos, L G Nussio.   

Abstract

Ethanol and acetic acid are common end products from silages. The main objective of this study was to determine whether high concentrations of ethanol or acetic acid in total mixed ration would affect performance in dairy cows. Thirty mid-lactation Holstein cows were grouped in 10 blocks and fed one of the following diets for 7 wk: (1) control (33% Bermuda hay + 67% concentrates), (2) ethanol [control diet + 5% ethanol, dry matter (DM) basis], or (3) acetic acid (control diet + 5% acetic acid, DM basis). Ethanol and acetic acid were diluted in water (1:2) and sprayed onto total mixed rations twice daily before feeding. An equal amount of water was mixed with the control ration. To adapt animals to these treatments, cows were fed only half of the treatment dose during the first week of study. Cows fed ethanol yielded more milk (37.9 kg/d) than those fed the control (35.8 kg/d) or acetic acid (35.3 kg/d) diets, mainly due to the higher DM intake (DMI; 23.7, 22.2, and 21.6 kg/d, respectively). The significant diet × week interaction for DMI, mainly during wk 2 and 3 (when acetic acid reached the full dose), was related to the decrease in DMI observed for the acetic acid treatment. There was a diet × week interaction in excretion of milk energy per DMI during wk 2 and 3, due to cows fed acetic acid sustained milk yield despite lower DMI. Energy efficiency was similar across diets. Blood metabolites (glucose, insulin, nonesterified fatty acids, ethanol, and γ-glutamyl transferase activity) and sensory characteristics of milk were not affected by these treatments. Animal performance suggested similar energy value for the diet containing ethanol compared with other diets. Rumen conversion of ethanol to acetate and a concomitant increase in methane production might be a plausible explanation for the deviation of the predicted energy value based on the heat of combustion. Therefore, the loss of volatile compounds during the drying process in the laboratory should be considered when calculating energy content of fermented feedstuffs.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23141834     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-5451

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

1.  Nutritional and productive performance of dairy cows fed corn silage or sugarcane silage with or without additives.

Authors:  Felipe Leite de Andrade; João Paulo Pacheco Rodrigues; Edenio Detmann; Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho; Marcelo Messias Duarte Castro; Aline Souza Trece; Tadeu Eder Silva; Vivian Fischer; Kirsten Weiss; Marcos Inácio Marcondes
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Effect of Feeding Lactating Ewes with Moringa oleifera Leaf Extract on Milk Yield, Milk Composition and Preweaning Performance of Ewe/Lamb Pair.

Authors:  Gabriel Olvera-Aguirre; Miriam Marleny Mendoza-Taco; Darwin Nicolas Arcos-Álvarez; Angel Trinidad Piñeiro-Vázquez; Victor Manuel Moo-Huchin; Jorge Rodolfo Canul-Solís; Luis Castillo-Sánchez; Marco Antonio Ramírez-Bautista; Einar Vargas-Bello-Pérez; Alfonso Juventino Chay-Canul
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Effect of temperature on single- and mixed-strain fermentation of ruminant feeds.

Authors:  Seungmin Woo; Sooah Kim; Suji Ye; Soo Rin Kim; Jeongman Seol; Uyeh Daniel Dooyum; Junhee Kim; Dong Hyuck Hong; Jong Nam Kim; Yushin Ha
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-31

4.  Effects of Obligate Heterofermentative Lactic Acid Bacteria Alone or in Combination on the Conservation of Sugarcane Silage.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Mendonça Gomes; Antônio Vinicius Iank Bueno; Milene Puntel Osmari; Juliana Machado; Luiz Gustavo Nussio; Clóves Cabreira Jobim; João Luiz Pratti Daniel
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.