OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the association of timing of lipid levels and lipid genetic risk score (GRS) with subclinical atherosclerosis. BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis is a slowly progressive disorder influenced by suboptimal lipid levels. Long-term versus contemporary lipid levels may more strongly impact the development of coronary artery calcium (CAC). METHODS: Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring Cohort participants (n = 1,156, 44% male, 63 ± 9 years) underwent serial fasting lipids (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides), Exam 1 (1971 to 1975) to Exam 7 (1998 to 2001). FHS Third Generation Cohort participants (n = 1,954, 55% male, 45 ± 6 years) had fasting lipid profiles assessed, 2002 to 2005. Computed tomography (2002 to 2005) measured CAC. Lipid GRSs were computed from significantly associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The association between early, long-term average, and contemporary lipids, and lipid GRS with elevated CAC was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: In FHS Offspring, Exam 1 and long-term average as compared with Exam 7 lipid measurements, including untreated lipid levels, were strongly associated with elevated CAC. In the FHS Third Generation, contemporary lipids were associated with CAC. The LDL-C GRS was associated with CAC (age-/sex-adjusted odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.29, p = 0.04). However, addition of the GRS to the lipid models did not result in a significant increase in the odds ratio or C-statistic for any lipid measure. CONCLUSIONS: Early and long-term average lipid levels, as compared with contemporary measures, are more strongly associated with elevated CAC. Lipid GRS was associated with lipid levels but did not predict elevated CAC. Adult early and long-term average lipid levels provide important information when assessing subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the association of timing of lipid levels and lipid genetic risk score (GRS) with subclinical atherosclerosis. BACKGROUND:Atherosclerosis is a slowly progressive disorder influenced by suboptimal lipid levels. Long-term versus contemporary lipid levels may more strongly impact the development of coronary artery calcium (CAC). METHODS: Framingham Heart Study (FHS) Offspring Cohort participants (n = 1,156, 44% male, 63 ± 9 years) underwent serial fasting lipids (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides), Exam 1 (1971 to 1975) to Exam 7 (1998 to 2001). FHS Third Generation Cohort participants (n = 1,954, 55% male, 45 ± 6 years) had fasting lipid profiles assessed, 2002 to 2005. Computed tomography (2002 to 2005) measured CAC. Lipid GRSs were computed from significantly associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms. The association between early, long-term average, and contemporary lipids, and lipid GRS with elevated CAC was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: In FHS Offspring, Exam 1 and long-term average as compared with Exam 7 lipid measurements, including untreated lipid levels, were strongly associated with elevated CAC. In the FHS Third Generation, contemporary lipids were associated with CAC. The LDL-C GRS was associated with CAC (age-/sex-adjusted odds ratio: 1.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.00 to 1.29, p = 0.04). However, addition of the GRS to the lipid models did not result in a significant increase in the odds ratio or C-statistic for any lipid measure. CONCLUSIONS: Early and long-term average lipid levels, as compared with contemporary measures, are more strongly associated with elevated CAC. Lipid GRS was associated with lipid levels but did not predict elevated CAC. Adult early and long-term average lipid levels provide important information when assessing subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk.
Authors: Greta Lee Splansky; Diane Corey; Qiong Yang; Larry D Atwood; L Adrienne Cupples; Emelia J Benjamin; Ralph B D'Agostino; Caroline S Fox; Martin G Larson; Joanne M Murabito; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ramachandran S Vasan; Philip A Wolf; Daniel Levy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-03-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: C Napoli; F P D'Armiento; F P Mancini; A Postiglione; J L Witztum; G Palumbo; W Palinski Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1997-12-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: L T Mahoney; T L Burns; W Stanford; B H Thompson; J D Witt; C A Rost; R M Lauer Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael M Mendelson; Asya Lyass; Christopher J O'Donnell; Ralph B D'Agostino; Daniel Levy Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Oyere K Onuma; Karol Pencina; Saadia Qazi; Joseph M Massaro; Ralph B D'Agostino; Michael L Chuang; Caroline S Fox; Udo Hoffmann; Christopher J O'Donnell Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Anthony N DeMaria; Jeroen J Bax; Gregory K Feld; Barry H Greenberg; Jennifer L Hall; Mark A Hlatky; Wilbur Y W Lew; João A C Lima; Ehtisham Mahmud; Alan S Maisel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Steven E Nissen; David J Sahn; Sotirios Tsimikas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-01-22 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Michael M Mendelson; Todd Regh; James Chan; Annette Baker; Heather Harker Ryan; Nicole Palumbo; Philip K Johnson; Suzanne Griggs; Meera Boghani; Nirav K Desai; Elizabeth Yellen; Lucy Buckley; Matthew W Gillman; Justin P Zachariah; Dionne Graham; Sarah D de Ferranti Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-08-31 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Emil M Degoma; Mat D Davis; Richard L Dunbar; Emile R Mohler; Philip Greenland; Benjamin French Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Charlotte Andersson; Asya Lyass; Martin G Larson; Sander J Robins; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Charlotte Andersson; Andrew D Johnson; Emelia J Benjamin; Daniel Levy; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 32.419