Literature DB >> 23141034

Pulmonary resections performed at hospitals with thoracic surgery residency programs have superior outcomes.

Castigliano M Bhamidipati1, George J Stukenborg, Gorav Ailawadi, Christine L Lau, Benjamin D Kozower, David R Jones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary resections are performed at thoracic residency (TR), general surgery residency (GSR), no surgery residency, and no residency hospitals. We hypothesize that morbidity and mortality for these procedures are different between hospitals and that operations performed at TR teaching hospitals have superior results.
METHODS: Records of adults who underwent pneumonectomy, lobar, segmentectomy, and nonanatomic wedge resections (N = 498,099) were evaluated in an all-payer inpatient database between 2003 and 2009. Hospital teaching status was determined by linkage to Association of American Medical College's Graduate Medical Education Tracking System. Multiple hierarchical regression models examined the in-hospital mortality, occurrence of any complication, and failure to rescue.
RESULTS: The mean annual pulmonary resection volume among hospitals was TR (16%), GSR (17%), no surgery residency (28%), and no residency (39%). Unadjusted mortality for all procedures was lowest at TR hospitals (P < .001). Likewise, any complication was least likely to occur at TR hospitals (P < .001). After case-mix adjustment, the risk of any complication after segmentectomy or nonanatomic wedge resection was lower at TR hospitals than in GSR hospitals (P < .001). Among pneumonectomy recipients, TR hospitals reduced the adjusted odds ratio of failure to rescue by more than 25% compared with no surgery residency (P < .001). Likewise, in patients who underwent pneumonectomy, TR centers were associated with reducing the odds ratio of death by more than 30% compared with GSR hospitals (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with other hospitals, including GSR hospitals, TR hospitals have lower morbidity and mortality. These results support using hospitals with a TR as an independent prognostic indicator of outcomes in pulmonary resections.
Copyright © 2013 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23141034     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  3 in total

1.  Editorial comment on: "Major morbidity after video-assisted thoracic surgery lung resections: a comparison between the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition and the Thoracic Morbidity and Mortality system" by Sandri A, et al.

Authors:  Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  The association between surgical volume, survival and quality of care.

Authors:  May Al-Sahaf; Eric Lim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Surgical treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul E Van Schil; Bram Balduyck; Michèle De Waele; Jeroen M Hendriks; Marjan Hertoghs; Patrick Lauwers
Journal:  EJC Suppl       Date:  2013-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.