Literature DB >> 23140926

Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for stage I-III mid and low rectal cancer: a retrospective 5 years analysis.

L M Siani1, F Ferranti, M Benedetti, Alessandro De Carlo, A Quintiliani.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the cornerstone of a correct surgical therapy for extraperitoneal rectal cancer. Aim of the study is to evaluate our 5 years experience confronting retrospectively laparoscopic (lap) TME in respect to its laparotomic (open) counterpart. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients were treated laparoscopically for stage I-III extraperitoneal rectal cancer and retrospectively compared to a homogeneous group, stratified for sex, age, comorbidities and stage of disease.
RESULTS: 30 days mortality was zero for both groups, while morbidity was 20% for the lap group and 36.6% for the open group. Mean lymph nodes harvested was 24 ± 12 for the lap group, 26 ± 14 for the open group (p > 0.05). Five years overall and disease free survival was respectively 82.2% and 81.4% in the lap group, 79.9% and 79.6% in the open group, without statistical significance (p>0.05). Discussion. Minimally invasive TME resulted a safe, effective and oncologically adequate procedure when retrospectively compared to its laparotomic counterpart, with 5 years overall survival and disease free survival reaching no statistical significance compared to the open approach, but with all the advantages of the laparoscopy such as less pain and blood loss, faster recovery, less morbidity and better cosmetics.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study has retrospectively demonstrated that laparoscopic TME is feasible and oncologically effective, even if it remains a complex minimally invasive procedure, requiring adequate skill. More prospective, randomized studies are necessary to define such a procedure as the new gold standard in treatment of stage I-III extraperitoneal rectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23140926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  G Chir        ISSN: 0391-9005


  5 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Jin-bo Jiang; Kun Jiang; Yong Dai; Ru-xia Wang; Wei-zhi Wu; Jing-jing Wang; Fu-Bo Xie; Xue-Mei Li
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Sun; Xianbo Yu; Haijiang Wang; Ming Ma; Zeliang Zhao; Qisan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Laparoscopy-assisted versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Huang; Hai-Guan Lin; Jian-Wu Yang; Fu-Quan Jiang; Tao Zhang; He-Ming Yang; Cheng-Lin Li; Yan Cui
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-06-15

4.  Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Middle and Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Shaotang Li; Feizhao Jiang; Jingfu Tu; Xiaofeng Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Urinary function following laparoscopic lymphadenectomy for male rectal cancer.

Authors:  Li-ye Liu; Wei-hui Liu; Yong-kuan Cao; Lin Zhang; Pei-hong Wang; Li-jun Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.