OBJECT: In patients who have sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypothermia therapy has not shown efficacy in multicenter clinical trials. Armed with the post hoc data from the latest clinical trial (National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia II), the authors hypothesized that hypothermia may be beneficial in an acute subdural hematoma (SDH) rat model by blunting the effects of ischemia/reperfusion injury. The major aim of this study was to test the efficacy of temperature management in reducing brain damage after acute SDH. METHODS: The rats were induced with acute SDH and placed into 1 of 4 groups: 1) normothermia group (37°C); 2) early hypothermia group, head and body temperature reduced to 33°C 30 minutes prior to craniotomy; 3) late hypothermia group, temperature lowered to 33°C 30 minutes after decompression; and 4) sham group, no acute SDH (only craniotomy with normothermia). To assess for neuronal and glial cell damage, the authors analyzed microdialysate concentrations of GFAP and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) by using a 100-kD probe. Fluoro-Jade B-positive neurons and injury volume with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining were also measured. RESULTS: In the early phase of reperfusion (30 minutes, 2.5 hours after decompression), extracellular UCH-L1 in the early hypothermia group was significantly lower than in the normothermia group (early, 4.9 ± 1.0 ng/dl; late, 35.2 ± 12.1 ng/dl; normothermia, 50.20 ± 28.3 ng/dl; sham, 3.1 ± 1.3 ng/dl; early vs normothermia, p < 0.01; sham vs normothermia, p < 0.01, analyzed using ANOVA followed by a post hoc Bonferroni test). In the late phase of reperfusion (> 2.5 hours after decompression), extracellular GFAP in the early hypothermia group was also lower than in the normothermia and late hypothermia groups (early, 5.5 ± 2.9 ng/dl; late, 7.4 ± 3.4 ng/dl; normothermia, 15.3 ± 8.4 ng/dl; sham, 3.3 ± 1.0 ng/dl; normothermia vs sham; p < 0.01). The number of Fluoro-Jade B-positive cells in the early hypothermia group was significantly smaller than that in the normothermia group (normothermia vs early: 774,588 ± 162,173 vs 180,903 ± 42,212, p < 0.05). Also, the injury area and volume were smaller in the early hypothermia group in which hypothermia was induced before craniotomy and cerebral reperfusion (early, 115.2 ± 15.4 mm(3); late, 344.7 ± 29.1 mm(3); normothermia, 311.2 ± 79.2 mm(3); p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that early, preoperatively induced hypothermia could mediate the reduction of neuronal and glial damage in the reperfusion phase of ischemia/reperfusion brain injury.
OBJECT: In patients who have sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI), hypothermia therapy has not shown efficacy in multicenter clinical trials. Armed with the post hoc data from the latest clinical trial (National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia II), the authors hypothesized that hypothermia may be beneficial in an acute subdural hematoma (SDH) rat model by blunting the effects of ischemia/reperfusion injury. The major aim of this study was to test the efficacy of temperature management in reducing brain damage after acute SDH. METHODS: The rats were induced with acute SDH and placed into 1 of 4 groups: 1) normothermia group (37°C); 2) early hypothermia group, head and body temperature reduced to 33°C 30 minutes prior to craniotomy; 3) late hypothermia group, temperature lowered to 33°C 30 minutes after decompression; and 4) sham group, no acute SDH (only craniotomy with normothermia). To assess for neuronal and glial cell damage, the authors analyzed microdialysate concentrations of GFAP and ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) by using a 100-kD probe. Fluoro-Jade B-positive neurons and injury volume with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining were also measured. RESULTS: In the early phase of reperfusion (30 minutes, 2.5 hours after decompression), extracellular UCH-L1 in the early hypothermia group was significantly lower than in the normothermia group (early, 4.9 ± 1.0 ng/dl; late, 35.2 ± 12.1 ng/dl; normothermia, 50.20 ± 28.3 ng/dl; sham, 3.1 ± 1.3 ng/dl; early vs normothermia, p < 0.01; sham vs normothermia, p < 0.01, analyzed using ANOVA followed by a post hoc Bonferroni test). In the late phase of reperfusion (> 2.5 hours after decompression), extracellular GFAP in the early hypothermia group was also lower than in the normothermia and late hypothermia groups (early, 5.5 ± 2.9 ng/dl; late, 7.4 ± 3.4 ng/dl; normothermia, 15.3 ± 8.4 ng/dl; sham, 3.3 ± 1.0 ng/dl; normothermia vs sham; p < 0.01). The number of Fluoro-Jade B-positive cells in the early hypothermia group was significantly smaller than that in the normothermia group (normothermia vs early: 774,588 ± 162,173 vs 180,903 ± 42,212, p < 0.05). Also, the injury area and volume were smaller in the early hypothermia group in which hypothermia was induced before craniotomy and cerebral reperfusion (early, 115.2 ± 15.4 mm(3); late, 344.7 ± 29.1 mm(3); normothermia, 311.2 ± 79.2 mm(3); p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that early, preoperatively induced hypothermia could mediate the reduction of neuronal and glial damage in the reperfusion phase of ischemia/reperfusion brain injury.
Authors: George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Kevin K Wang; Mary Ann Wilson; Jeremiah G Allen; Chase W Robinson; Kara A Haggerty; Eric S Weiss; Mary E Blue; Charles C Talbot; Juan C Troncoso; Michael V Johnston; William A Baumgartner Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jed A Hartings; C William Shuttleworth; Sergei A Kirov; Cenk Ayata; Jason M Hinzman; Brandon Foreman; R David Andrew; Martyn G Boutelle; K C Brennan; Andrew P Carlson; Markus A Dahlem; Christoph Drenckhahn; Christian Dohmen; Martin Fabricius; Eszter Farkas; Delphine Feuerstein; Rudolf Graf; Raimund Helbok; Martin Lauritzen; Sebastian Major; Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira; Frank Richter; Eric S Rosenthal; Oliver W Sakowitz; Renán Sánchez-Porras; Edgar Santos; Michael Schöll; Anthony J Strong; Anja Urbach; M Brandon Westover; Maren Kl Winkler; Otto W Witte; Johannes Woitzik; Jens P Dreier Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-01-01 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Shyam Gajavelli; Vishal K Sinha; Anna T Mazzeo; Markus S Spurlock; Stephanie W Lee; Aminul I Ahmed; Shoji Yokobori; Ross M Bullock Journal: J Bioenerg Biomembr Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 2.945
Authors: Shyam Gajavelli; Shimoda Kentaro; Julio Diaz; Shoji Yokobori; Markus Spurlock; Daniel Diaz; Clayton Jackson; Alexandra Wick; Weizhao Zhao; Lai Y Leung; Deborah Shear; Frank Tortella; M Ross Bullock Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Morgan Heinzelmann; Swarnalatha Y Reddy; Louis M French; Dan Wang; Hyunhwa Lee; Taura Barr; Tristin Baxter; Vincent Mysliwiec; Jessica Gill Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 4.003