Literature DB >> 23140064

Ethical implications of diversity in disaster research.

Matthew R Hunt1, James A Anderson, Renaud F Boulanger.   

Abstract

Enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency, and fairness of interventions is an increasing source of concern in the field of disaster response. As a result, the expansion of the disaster relief evidence base has been identified as a pressing need. There has been a corresponding increase in discussions of ethical standards and procedures for disaster research. In general, these discussions have focused on elucidating how traditional research ethics concerns can be operationalized in disaster settings. Less attention has been given to the exploration of the ethical implications of heterogeneity within the field of disaster research. Hence, while current efforts to discuss the ethics of disaster research in low-resource settings are very encouraging, it is clear that further initiatives will be crucial to promote the ethical conduct of disaster research. In this article, we explore how the ethical review of disaster research conducted in low-resource settings should account for this diversity. More specifically, we consider how the nature of the project (what?), sociopolitical and physical environment of research sites (where?), temporal proximity to the disaster event (when?), objectives motivating the research (why?), and identity of the stakeholders involved in the research process (who?) all relate to the ethics of disaster research.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23140064     DOI: 10.5055/ajdm.2012.0096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Disaster Med        ISSN: 1932-149X


  8 in total

Review 1.  A systematic literature search on psychological first aid: lack of evidence to develop guidelines.

Authors:  Tessa Dieltjens; Inge Moonens; Koen Van Praet; Emmy De Buck; Philippe Vandekerckhove
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A research agenda for humanitarian health ethics.

Authors:  Matthew Hunt; Lisa Schwartz; John Pringle; Renaud Boulanger; Elysée Nouvet; Dónal O'Mathúna
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2014-08-12

3.  The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members.

Authors:  Matthew Hunt; Catherine M Tansey; James Anderson; Renaud F Boulanger; Lisa Eckenwiler; John Pringle; Lisa Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Research in disaster settings: a systematic qualitative review of ethical guidelines.

Authors:  Signe Mezinska; Péter Kakuk; Goran Mijaljica; Marcin Waligóra; Dónal P O'Mathúna
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.

Authors:  Catherine M Tansey; James Anderson; Renaud F Boulanger; Lisa Eckenwiler; John Pringle; Lisa Schwartz; Matthew Hunt
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Facebook Enables Disaster Research Studies: The Use of Social Media to Recruit Participants in a Post-Disaster Setting.

Authors:  Karin Hugelius; Annsofie Adolfsson; Mervyn Gifford; Per Örtenwall
Journal:  PLoS Curr       Date:  2017-01-19

7.  Research and Global Health Emergencies: On the Essential Role of Best Practice.

Authors:  Nayha Sethi
Journal:  Public Health Ethics       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 1.940

8.  Ethical considerations and interdisciplinary approach to research on COVID-19 pandemic: The response of Iran University of Medical Sciences.

Authors:  Akram Hashemi; Fatemeh Bahmani; Saeedeh Saeedi Tehrani; Mina Forouzandeh; Jalil Koohpayehzadeh; Mortaza Ashrafi; Majid Reza Khalajzadeh; Seyed Abbas Motevalian
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-07-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.