Literature DB >> 23138936

Do domestic dogs interpret pointing as a command?

Linda Scheider1, Juliane Kaminski, Josep Call, Michael Tomasello.   

Abstract

Domestic dogs comprehend human gestural communication flexibly, particularly the pointing gesture. Here, we examine whether dogs interpret pointing informatively, that is, as simply providing information, or rather as a command, for example, ordering them to move to a particular location. In the first study a human pointed toward an empty cup. In one manipulation, the dog either knew or did not know that the designated cup was empty (and that the other cup actually contained the food). In another manipulation, the human (as authority) either did or did not remain in the room after pointing. Dogs ignored the human's gesture if they had better information, irrespective of the authority's presence. In the second study, we varied the level of authority of the person pointing. Sometimes this person was an adult, and sometimes a young child. Dogs followed children's pointing just as frequently as they followed adults' pointing (and ignored the dishonest pointing of both), suggesting that the level of authority did not affect their behavior. Taken together these studies suggest that dogs do not see pointing as an imperative command ordering them to a particular location. It is still not totally clear, however, if they interpret it as informative or in some other way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23138936     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-012-0577-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  8 in total

1.  Dogs do not demonstrate a human-like bias to defer to communicative cues.

Authors:  Angie M Johnston; Yiyun Huang; Laurie R Santos
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Behavioral and Self-report Measures Influencing Children's Reported Attachment to Their Dog.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Hall; Jingwen Liu; Darlene A Kertes; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  Anthrozoos       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 1.689

3.  Domesticated dogs (Canis familiaris) tend to follow repeated deceptive human cues even when food is visible.

Authors:  Candice Dwyer; Mark R Cole
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Dogs' insensitivity to scaffolding behaviour in an A-not-B task provides support for the theory of natural pedagogy.

Authors:  Patrick Neilands; Olivia Kingsley-Smith; Alex H Taylor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Overimitation in Dogs: Is There a Link to the Quality of the Relationship with the Caregiver?

Authors:  Ludwig Huber; Denise Kubala; Giulia Cimarelli
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Do domestic dogs understand human actions as goal-directed?

Authors:  Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Maria Ceretta; Emanuela Prato-Previde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A reappraisal of successive negative contrast in two populations of domestic dogs.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Sarah L H Ellis; Sian Ryan; Hannah Thompson; Oliver H P Burman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.084

8.  Free-Ranging Dogs Are Capable of Utilizing Complex Human Pointing Cues.

Authors:  Debottam Bhattacharjee; Sarab Mandal; Piuli Shit; Mebin George Varghese; Aayushi Vishnoi; Anindita Bhadra
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.